The Beatles Are Not That Good.

Wave.

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
2,940
Kin
5💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
As the titles says, does anyone else feel as if the Beatles are just... ONE of the first rock groups around so they always get credit for being good, even when they are actually mediocore at best? I mean, all their songs sound a like and there is no difference in tone or mood.

Unlike another ban at that time, that actually does transition fairly well. You may have heard of them, THE ROLLING STONES. So, the main purpose of this thread is to see what people prefer. The boring and same Beatles who take acid by the metric ton to just produce songs that will get Hippies excited. Or, the cultural and revolutionary Rolling Stones.

Listen to these songs and post your answer in this thread!



[video=youtube_share;vBecM3CQVD8]http://youtu.be/vBecM3CQVD8[/video]

And please, do not just say "The Beatles becaus they inspired everyone!" Like every band says in interviews. They were just FIRST people! It doens't mean they were the best! They did not revolutionize the genre! They may have pushed things a bit faster, but the real credit goes to bands such as Rollign Stones, Thin Lizzy, Led Zeplin, et cetera.
 

P3ĮÑ

Active member
Immortal
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
46,041
Kin
375💸
Kumi
48💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Good. Accept your opinion is awful and now throw away your beliefs in The Beatles being good.

Rolling Stones are the way to go u_u
I do like Rolling Stones, nirvana, disturbed and also a similar band "12 stones" ....I like many many bands, but I wouldn't say they're completely awful lol
 

Wave.

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
2,940
Kin
5💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The Beatles are nothing more than cheap copies of One Direction.​
I sort of agree. Though, One Direction took a shitty role model and SLIGHTLY improved upon. I say improved, because they at least have fans now. Before there wasn't much competition for fans. Which is why the Beatles go so big. One direction at least knows how to get SOME fans in this hectic world

I do like Rolling Stones, nirvana, disturbed and also a similar band "12 stones" ....I like many many bands, but I wouldn't say they're completely awful lol
Sir, please walk off a cliff.
 

Troyg39

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
3,369
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
If you were the first to do something and inspired just about everyone that came after, how did you not revolutionize it? You started it and influenced it after.

OT: You clearly don't like them so they aren't that good to you. But you can't knock their success. Enough people do like them for your opinion not to be fact. I'm not that big of a fan of them myself, but I also think the best thing that came out of The Rolling Stones were their magazine. Not because their music sucks I like it, I just love the magazine
 

Nathan

Active member
Immortal
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
54,365
Kin
409💸
Kumi
615💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I sort of agree. Though, One Direction took a shitty role model and SLIGHTLY improved upon. I say improved, because they at least have fans now. Before there wasn't much competition for fans. Which is why the Beatles go so big. One direction at least knows how to get SOME fans in this hectic world
The Beatles revolutionised music. You need to put your ego in check, seriously. The way you treat members, is rather distasteful.

Let me get this right; if they agree with you, they are fine. But if someone doesn't, you tell them to kill themselves, or they have a shitty opinion, you should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wumbo
Top