The Ōtsutsuki Tribe Becoming The Uzumaki Clan

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
I could say the same concerning the Sage and his reincarnation (Naruto) coming from the same heritage, you see, your argument hinges on the subjective placing of value in literary merit which itself is a categorical error in that you present it as an objective reason in your argument.

Except The Sage being Uzumaki is completely irrelevant to the story.

If the Sage is Uzumaki, nothing changes. Everything stays the same whether he is or not, it has no impact.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, it has an enourmous impact on the story.

But why dwell on this? My latter two arguments are far more compelling.
 

Bogard

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
21,914
Reaction score
2,378
Not this garbage again Zzz
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
Except The Sage being Uzumaki is completely irrelevant to the story.

If the Sage is Uzumaki, nothing changes. Everything stays the same whether he is or not, it has no impact.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, it has an enourmous impact on the story.

That itself is subjective, I could say the same, if Minato was Naruto's father, Naruto would still be the same and Minato would still have been the Fourth Hokage. You see, you are placing your personal subjective valuation as a literary criterion for objective analysis and argument of the Manga, that is your fallacy.
 
Last edited:

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
That itself is subjective, I could say the same, if Minato was Naruto's father, Naruto would still be the same and Minato would still have been the Fourth Hokage. You see, you are placing your personal subjective valuation as a literary criterion for objective analysis and argument of the Manga, that is your fallacy.

Ah, no. It's not subjective at all.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, there would be

(1) No KCM
(2) No BM
(3) Naruto would have been dead, and lost to Pein
(4) The last 30 chapters would never have happened

So... Not getting this whole "subjective" thing. If the Sage is/isn't Uzumaki, nothing radically changes. At all.

Still waiting on that other half, that you keep neglecting (as you always do; if your theory is so solid, it should be cake to counter those).
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
Ah, no. It's not subjective at all.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, there would be

(1) No KCM
(2) No BM
(3) Naruto would have been dead, and lost to Pein
(4) The last 30 chapters would never have happened

So... Not getting this whole "subjective" thing. If the Sage is/isn't Uzumaki, nothing radically changes. At all.

You are making a categorical error again by reifying the fact that the Fourth Hokage must be written as Naruto's father in order for the plot to ensue as a conditio sine qua non, even if the Fourth Hokage was written as Naruto's father or not, the outcome would still be the same, he would still be the character created to be Kurama's Jinchuuriki and the Fourth Hokage would still be the Fourth Hokage.
 

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
You are making a categorical error again by reifying the fact that the Fourth Hokage must be written as Naruto's father in order for the plot to ensue as a conditio sine qua non, even if the Fourth Hokage was written as Naruto's father or not, the outcome would still be the same, he would still be the character created to be Kurama's Jinchuuriki and the Fourth Hokage would still be the Fourth Hokage.

Now you're just tossing out big words to try and sound like the next biggest mind on this freaking planet.

What don't you understand here?

If Minato isn't Naruto's father, he never would have placed his or Kushinams chakra inside Naruto, which would drastically have changed the story.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, none of that would have happened.

But I'm telling you for the last time:

Ignore this. I'm far more interested in what you have to say about my two final points.

Unless the great Sir Derp Obito can't answer two questions about his own proposed theory.
 

Anorien16

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
497
From the avbove page it is clear:
1. Uzumaki has strong life force.
2. Some Uzumaki individuals like Mito and Kushina are born with powerful chakra.
3. Uzumaki clan specializes in sealing jutsu.

Notice that just like the Sage the Uzumaki clan is good at sealing jutsu and good at being Jinks, unlike any of his sons or their direct descendents.

So it can be seen that Uzumaki clan is definately related Younger son, but they cld have been related to Older son too. Which wld make them possessor or both the power of 'body' (Life force from younger son) and 'eye' (Strong chakra from Elder son) . . . . Do u get the relevance? Younger son never had strong chakra, only physical energy and life force; strong chakra comes from Elder son. Mito even had a strange looking eyes, bit like a byakugan.

So as we have seen that Hashi cells ,ie, power of senzu 'body' affects and improves the Uchiha 'eye' powers significantly (Like KA CD reduced to at most 24 hours, Izanagi duration increased etc) . . . . So if they were to join their bloodlines it would create a totally new line ninja powers unlike both Senzu and the Uchiha. Possiblity is that such originators of Uzumaki clan is very distant relatives of both Senzu (Kushi did say distant) and Uchiha (????) and so their power is much diluted.

Now see this:

The Uzumaki symbol is kinda of a mixture of Elder son eye and Uchiha colour enclosed in the two Senzu semicircles joined together to form a perfect circle.
Also notice another strange thing: the name Uzumaki seems to be mixture of 'U' from Uchiha and 'zu' (I know its 'Ju' but its homophonic substitution is 'zu') from Senzu (Also note that maki means 'true, hope' in jap) . . . U know it happens a lot: two warring families, young boy and girl from opposing sides fall in love and run away get married and get *busy* etc etc and they start a new clan combining their family names U' from Uchiha and 'zu' from Senzu and add Maki = true/hope to it reffering to the point that they are the true heirs of the sage or hope for peace.

ITs this OR Sage himself was from the Uzumaki clan.

Also those who say Uzumaki use life force as chakra forget that the basic lesson, 'stamina' is the basis of chakra not life force. See:

I once posted a somewhat similar theory myself ( ) based on limited evidence .... I thought the repost may be relevant here.

My point remains that the Strong Chakra seen occasionally in the Uzumaki clan is not part of Younger son's inheiritance ... its actually older son's power ..... no where it was stated the Senju has powerful chakra.
 
Last edited:

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
Now you're just tossing out big words to try and sound like the next biggest mind on this freaking planet.

What don't you understand here?

If Minato isn't Naruto's father, he never would have placed his or Kushinams chakra inside Naruto, which would drastically have changed the story.

If Minato wasn't Naruto's father, none of that would have happened.

Again you are saying that the Fourth Hokage's character must be necessarily written as the father of the main character in order for the plot to progress wherein fact the writer could have easily written the Yondaime as either a guardian or an uncle, brother, etc. and ultimately the plot would've progressed the same, your error, is that you are placing the fact that the Yondaime's character must absolutely be written as the Main Character's father as a conditio sine qua non, that is your falsity. These things, you could argue, was done, from a literary perspective, as a vehicle for dramatic effect between the interaction of Naruto and the Yondaime if the former was the son of the latter, but if the merit of such things are based on dramatic impact, I could argue the same that the Sage being an Uzumaki would give greater dramatic impact/effect between Naruto and Hagoromo, so ultimately, the presentation of your argument basing artistic merit and presenting it as an objective literary criterion is erroneous.
 
Last edited:

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
Again you are saying that the Fourth Hokage's character must be necessarily written as the father of the main character in order for the plot to progress wherein fact the writer could have easily written the Yondaime as either a guardian or an uncle, brother, etc. and ultimately the plot would've progressed the same, your error, is that you are placing the fact that the Yondaime's character must absolutely be written as the Main Character's father as a conditio sine qua non, that is your falsity. These things, you could argue, that it was done, from a literary perspective, as a vehicle for dramatic impact between the interaction of Naruto and the Yondaime if the former was the son of the latter, but if the merit of such things are based on dramatic impact, I could argue the same that the Sage being an Uzumaki would give greater dramatic impact/effect between Naruto and Hagoromo, so ultimately, the presentation of your argument basing artistic merit and presenting it as an objective literary criterion is erroneous.

Lord, you must have no social life.

You don't seem to understand;

Minato only works as Naruto's father with those sequence of events.

You can't even give me 3 major reasons The Sage being Uzumaki would have an effect on the plot.
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
Lord, you must have no social life.

You don't seem to understand;

Minato only works as Naruto's father with those sequence of events.

You can't even give me 3 major reasons The Sage being Uzumaki would have an effect on the plot.

No, it is you who does not understand the contingency of literary progression is based on the Author's will regardless whether the Fourth Hokage was written as the main character's father or not. And now you are resulting to Ad Homnem.
 

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
No, it is you who does not understand the contingency of literary progression is based on the Author. And now you are resulting to Ad Homnem.

So if Minato is Naruto's uncle and is married to his mom Kushina, it still works?

The whole story would have to be revamped. You make no sense.

I realize I'm resorting to Ad Homnem, and I don't care.
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
So if Minato is Naruto's uncle and is married to his mom Kushina, it still works?

The whole story would have to be revamped. You make no sense.

I realize I'm resorting to Ad Homnem, and I don't care.

Straw mans and Ad Hominems, I am disappointed at you.
 

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
Straw mans and Ad Hominems, I am disappointed at you.

You're disappointed at me? Well gee, life has lost all meaning. This isn't a straw man. Yes, I took College Comp too, Derp. It's an actual argument you need to refute. You're suggesting the story would not have changed much if Minato was Naruto's uncle instead, but clearly the story would have to be radically altered for that to fit.

You still haven't answered my question.
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
You're disappointed at me? Well gee, life has lost all meaning. This isn't a straw man. Yes, I took College Comp too, Derp. It's an actual argument you need to refute. You're suggesting the story would not have changed much if Minato was Naruto's uncle instead, but clearly the story would have to be radically altered for that to fit.

You still haven't answered my question.

And why would that be:

So if Minato is Naruto's uncle and is married to his mom Kushina, it still works?

if you argue that Minato was his uncle who married his widowed sister-in-law and he made his nephew Kurama's Jinchuuriki then ultimately the end effect is still the same: Naruto would still be Kurama's Jinchuuriki, and if that uncle decided to help him in the future, then he would've sealed his chakra inside him, so what's the difference of the end-effect? nothing.
 
Last edited:

D R E X

Banned
Elite
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
5,941
Reaction score
644
Lord , this makes perfect sense ...some of the secrets have surfaced .

I too have something to contribute .

You must be registered for see images


You've probably noticed it but i'll explain it anyways.

Kin -Gin brothers have horns as their trait and so as the Princess Kayuga .

You must be registered for see images


My theory is by generations , every Uzumaki had horns as their clans trait and by time passed away they had to protect

their clan and secrets by distinguishing their whole identity from enemies . Therefore , they somehow erased their horns and some other trait marks
.

Kin-gin brothers are from the ancient times and went rogue ...so that's why they still have their horns , i believe .

I also believe that the Uzumaki / Ototsuki clan were ancient Guardians of NV ...and they gave up their powers so they can live as normal humans and guide the world towards peace . ( NARUTO )
 
Last edited:

KingHashirama

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
27,280
Reaction score
1,690
Why add all of the connections and have the sage as some random person?

Some random person? what??? All the manga connections lead to Uzumaki being from Senju lineage. And as for "some random person".. how exactly would the creator of the shinobi sect be some random person, when he was the son of a goddess?
 

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
And why would that be:



if you argue that Minato was his uncle who married his widowed sister-in-law and he made his nephew Kurama's Jinchuuriki then ultimately the end effect is still the same: Naruto would still be Kurama's Jinchuuriki, and if that uncle decided to help him in the future, then he would've sealed his chakra inside him, so what's the difference of the end-effect? nothing.

That's a radically changed story! How can you say it's not?

Minato/Kushina backstory has to be completly revamped.

Naruto no longer has a connection with Minato (Uncle is nowhere near Father).

Why does Naruto look so much like Minato then?

And you kind of talked yourself into a corner here. You said the end effect would still remain the same (which it wouldn't), and yet doesn't this apply to The Sage being Uzumaki as well? It has no impact, it's just a cool little addition.
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Reaction score
7,032
Naruto no longer has a connection with Minato (Uncle is nowhere near Father).

But that's what I'm arguing from the start! (lol) , it's for dramatic impact, you said it yourself: an uncle is nowhere near a father, so if Yondaime was made Naruto's uncle instead of his father then that would lessen the dramatic impact it would have. So If I argue that for dramatic purposes, the Sage being an Uzumaki would give a greater connection between Naruto and Rikudou, then by your own reasoning, the Sage being an Uzumaki is meritorious. Lol
 
Last edited:

KingHashirama

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
27,280
Reaction score
1,690
But that's what I'm arguing from the start (lol) , it's for dramatic impact, you said it yourself: an uncle is nowhere near a father, so if Yondaime was made Naruto's uncle instead of his father then that would lessen the dramatic impact it would have. So If I argue that for dramatic purposes, the Sage being an Uzumaki would give a greater connection between Naruto and Rikudou, then by your own reasoning, my argument is valid. Lol

Not truly. You are cutting off Naruto from the senju representation, by making Rikudou an uzumaki. On top of that Senju and Uchiha themselves descend from the "Ōtsutsuki Tribe"... So even by the current manga uzumaki are also descendants of that tribe, just like Senju and Uchiha. So the impact you are talking about is pretty much nothing at all.

So basically your theory is already canon.. only change is that it involves all 3 of the clans.
 

Booker

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
8,352
Reaction score
958
But that's what I'm arguing from the start! (lol) , it's for dramatic impact, you said it yourself: an uncle is nowhere near a father, so if Yondaime was made Naruto's uncle instead of his father then that would lessen the dramatic impact it would have. So If I argue that for dramatic purposes, the Sage being an Uzumaki would give a greater connection between Naruto and Rikudou, then by your own reasoning, the Sage being an Uzumaki is meritorious. Lol

It's goes beyond that though! Minato being Naruto's father actually made tangible difference in the story, I honestly just want to hear from you what you think The Sage being Uzumaki would supply?
 
Top