Egypt's Pharaohs were European (DNA Results)!!!

FireBird Marco

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
2,590
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
A new DNA test on King Tutankhamun has shocked the world, by disclosing his European Ancestry!!

[video=youtube;fZ_SJt9gMMg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fZ_SJt9gMMg[/video]​

Such a shocking news...

Enjoy :)
 

Sir Blades

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
18,911
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
My History and Genetics class came up with that same theory but obviously we couldnt go take dna from a Pharaoh. But now we know we were right.
 

sinbad

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
1,621
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
i am an Egyptian and i work as Archaeologist

i am telling you that is just a lie take a look at king tut chair he had dark skin
You must be registered for see images
 

FireBird Marco

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
2,590
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
i am an Egyptian and i work as Archaeologist

i am telling you that is just a lie take a look at king tut chair he had dark skin
You must be registered for see images
DNA Results >>> Everything else
There's no way to determine whether that picture is fake or original..
There're many Greek, Roman and European Sculptures made of black granite and bronze; does that mean they were black? NO, it's just the materials used for the work simply!
 

sinbad

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
1,621
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
DNA Results >>> Everything else
There's no way to determine whether that picture is fake or original..
There're many Greek, Roman and European Sculptures made of black granite and bronze; does that mean they were black? NO, it's just the materials used for the work simply!
this is pic from king tut tomb he had also dark skin on it

You must be registered for see images
 

cptenn94

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2,779
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
i am an Egyptian and i work as Archaeologist

i am telling you that is just a lie take a look at king tut chair he had dark skin
You must be registered for see images
Just because he had dark skin doesnt mean he isnt also european.

Example.

A white person and a dark person have a baby.

that baby may either have more light/tan skin, or more likely will have a slightly lighter tone of skin than the dark parent, but will still have dark skin.


Look at president obama. He is half white, but he is still dark skinned.(although he could pass as a tan white, if not for his facial features)



Also on a seperate note, just because he is painted as being dark, doesnt neccesarily mean he actually was. (painters will sometimes paint someone to look better/different than they might be.
 

FireBird Marco

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
2,590
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
this is pic from king tut tomb he had also dark skin on it

You must be registered for see images
DNA >>> than pictures
Again, the reason for the dark red color used in ancient Egyptian wall arts is because of the materials available around the Nile and because, dark red was considered as a symbol of fertility, fatherly and being blessed by the nature and the Nile river.

Sorry if the truth is too much for you, but these are DNA results!
Also less than 1% of current Egyptians relate to Ancient Egyptians, so there's a 99.99999% chance that you're actually not an Egyptian lol XD
gg
 
Last edited:

sinbad

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
1,621
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
dark red wasn't symbol of fertility . ancient Egyptian have white ppl to and they used white color on painting them color doesn't mean any thing we don't have the color issue in egypt
 

Sir Blades

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
18,911
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
dark red wasn't symbol of fertility . ancient Egyptian have white ppl to and they used white color on painting them color doesn't mean any thing we don't have the color issue in egypt
Here another example, Two hispanics are brown and have a baby that comes out with light skin and brown hair. It happens a lot. Just cause your parents are a certain color does not mean you are gonna be that color as well. Go study genetics of modern and ancient society, i bet archeology cant answer that.
Oh and have you found the 7 millennium items? I need the millennium puzzle to beat my brother in yu gi oh.
 

Tendou00

Active member
Immortal
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
64,191
Kin
12💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
king tut was black african because the paintings inside the pryamids show egyptians with dark brown skin!! end of story.

The same people that told us Tut was white are the same people that told us that Ethiopians are caucasoid! Nuff said. Anybody to believe what the majority of white people say needs some serious education.
 

YowYan

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
15,124
Kin
1,244💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Leave it to a braindead white supremacist to focus on such irrelevant stuff that's most likely not even legitimate.
Rather talk about the actual use for the pyramids, for one. Some say they're made to conduct cosmic energy or something.
Now that's interesting. Not the misplaced pride in having the same skin color as the pharaohs.
 

Anorien16

Active member
Elite
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
5,543
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Well the Pharaohs WERE incest loving, elitist, lying scumbags .... good thing the blood line is mostly irrelevant now.

But as yow pointed out .... Ancient Egyptian knowledge is much more interesting.

Also a lil bit internet scearching actually reveal another interesting side:



A personal genomics company in Switzerland says they've reconstructed a DNA profile of King Tutankhamen by watching the Discovery Channel, claiming the results suggest more than half of Western European men are related to the boy king. But researchers who worked to decode Tut's genome in the first place say the claim is "unscientific."

Swiss genomics company iGENEA has launched a Tutankhamen DNA project based on what they say are genetic markers that appeared on a computer screen during a Discovery Channel special on the famous pharaoh's genetic lineage.

"Maybe they didn't know what they showed, but we got 16 markers from the Y chromosome from these pharaohs," Roman Scholz, the managing director of iGENEA, told LiveScience.

If the claims were true, it would put King Tut in a genetic profile group shared by more than half of Western European men. That would make those men relatives — albeit distant ones — of the pharaoh.

But Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible." Pusch and his colleagues published part of their results, though not the Y-chromosome DNA, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010. The Y chromosome is the *** chromosome found only in males, and looking at the genes in this chromosome would show Tut's male lineage.

Pusch's team used snippets of Y-chromosome DNA to link Tut to his closest relatives, identifying his mom and dad. But they didn't publish the full genetic data that would allow genomics companies like iGENEA to link modern people to the Tutankhamen lineage. According to Scholz, that crucial data is what appeared on the Discovery Channel.

"Dr. Albert Zink from the EURAC [European Academy of Bolzano, an independent research center] in Bolzano and co-author of the 2010 JAMA publication screened the footage and confirmed that the company acts very unscientific," Pusch wrote in an email to LiveScience. "The Swiss company did not try to get into contact with us prior to launching their new Internet page."

The alleged Discovery Channel markers put Tut in a genetic profile group, or haplogroup, that also includes more than half of the men in Western Europe. Scholz said the company is now searching for the closest living relatives of Tutankhamen, men who share all 16 genetic markers on the pharaoh's supposed Y chromosome. Exact matches get a refund for their $179 to $399 test and will also get free additional DNA analysis.

The haplogroup R1b1a2, which iGENEA claims includes King Tut, arose 9,500 years ago in the Black Sea region. How Tut's ancestors would have gotten from that region to Egypt is unknown, but Scholz said iGENEA hopes to learn more by collecting more close and exact matches from modern people of Western European descent.

"The better the match, the more recent the common ancestor," Scholz said.

But people hoping to prove that they've got an ancestor in common with the notoriously sickly boy king should take iGENEA's claims with a grain of salt, Pusch said: "It appears that they try to better sell their DNA testing kit by using the media attention connected to King Tut."


Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.

The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.

"It was very interesting to discover that he belonged to a genetic group in Europe -- there were many possible groups in Egypt that the DNA could have belonged to," said Roman Scholz, director of the iGENEA Centre.

Around 70 percent of Spanish and 60 percent of French men also belong to the genetic group of the Pharaoh who ruled Egypt more than 3,000 years ago.

"We think the common ancestor lived in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago," Scholz told Reuters.

It is estimated that the earliest migration of haplogroup R1b1a2 into Europe began with the spread of agriculture in 7,000 BC, according to iGENEA.

However, the geneticists were not sure how Tutankhamun's paternal lineage came to Egypt from its region of origin.

The centre is now using DNA testing to search for the closest living relatives of "King Tut".

"The offer has only been publicised for three days but we have already seen a lot of interest," Scholz told Reuters. (Edited by Paul Casciato)
Also .... if someone actually had any idea how genetic work or infact has some form of comprehending capability he would notice that Tut was actually not European ..... It is just suggested that just he and many Europeans actually share a common ancestor somewhere in Europe-Asia border area or something ....
 
Last edited:
Top