I get what you meant, but that's what i am trying to tell you, her belief in karma is not letting her present solid arguments about this in a conversation. The uncertainty we all see there is not random, it is a choice. People who believe in karma will not tell you that karma is real nor that karma is fake. They will state their opinion in a way to not let you know what they truly believe about it, as supporting an argument with solid statements is really something she/i/ we don't want to do. There are no statements and no arguments, there is here and now, awareness of the fact that i am talking to you right now. Making a statement about this is contradicting to the concept of karma itself, so since i don't need to make it, i have no reason to make it. That's the reason behind her uncertainty. It's a way of talking that shows her beliefs.You didn't get what I said. If you look at my post, you see I highlighted certain words in the quote. What she posted doesn't sound solid because she indicates she isn't sure of her own case. Things 'may be' and 'usually' are like that, etc. They aren't solid enough to support an argument with, you need solid statements, preferably facts, to support an argument.
I agree 100% with what you said. The interpretation changes, and how we interpret something shows who we are. Yes, i also believe that religion is a tool to control, but karma is not a religion. Is a million things but not a religion. Maybe it is traditionally connected to Hinduism and Buddhism, but i don't believe in any religion, yet my belief in karma is unbreakable.It's how you interpret the statement. Some people do think it's a second chance. We're discussing a subject that can be related to religion here, people interpret it exactly the way they like to. 'God hates fags' and 'kill infidels for Allah' are statements that many people say not to be true, however, there's also enough people that consider these a fact. Religion is interpreted the way people want to, it's merely a tool to control people with anyways, there's tons of flavors, all depending on what the starter of the religion intended to get done.
I agree with this also. For them it was completely necessary and that's why they did it. They had a reason to do it. In the same way, i have a reason to think it was monstrous.And also here, it all depends on how it's interpreted. If you tell this to someone that is dedicated to the nazi religion (Esoteric Hitlerism), they will punish you for blasphemy. To them, what Hitler did, was completely necessary so that the Aryan race could regain the lands what once was theirs.
Last edited: