After the technique ends it causes harm. Deidara proves this. It might be immediately after but it causes harm, manga fact.
Exactly, Idk what youre trying to prove here, lmfao....Kamui causes harm, fact
.
Because it can kill its an attack? Cars must be attacks too, shit your words can be attacks cuz you have gone from debating to making fun of me and calling me a troll. Not once have you provided any form of a scan and the definition u pulled up from Webster would fall under intent. Obito isn't immune to amaterasu. Where did you get that from?
Lol, you agree with me again, it seems youre losing your stability in this argument XD.
Cars are considered deadly weapons. Weapons are the cause for the attack, same with a car. It is a weapon, kamui is a weapon, FTG is a transportation technique, lmfao.
Words can be attacks simpleton, its called
verbal abuse.
& read the chapter where obito got hit with ama & sustained no damage :sy:.
I never said it can't cause damage. In fact i said damage is a byproduct of the technique when done incorrectly.
Moron
Damage is not a byproduct, it is a result no matter what.
You must be registered for see links
A byproduct is an
unintended result,
kakashi's damage caused by kamui is not unintended, its fully intended. Therefore it is a result of him using kamui!
damage is only a byproduct when kakashi is using his attack as a method of transportation. He didnt fully warp bee, the byproduct was the tentacle that got cut off in the process. When he warped deidara that was a result because that was the intended outcome for using his attack as an attack.
You must be registered for see links
See the difference? Of course you dont, youre going to spout some nonsense, & im gonna make you look like sh*t again. It seems that the amount of your ignorance knows no bounds
.
I'm not blundering a thing. You just keep throwing scenarios harm is possible as if it changes the mechanics of the technique.
It merely transports things from one dimension to the next. Just because there is room for user error that doesn't make it an attack.
Lol, yes you are.
The mechanics of kamui are that it can cause immediate harm to its opponent.
Only attacks & weapons are shown to cause immediate harm to their opponents. Denying kamui's credibility as an attack or weapon is to deny that kamui causes harm to an opponent as soon as it ends, which you clearly didn't. If you wanna keep looking like a dumbass then be my guest, but you fail if you think that an attack depends on the user & not the jutsu itself.
That's not true in all cases. Kakashi said he was going to warp the juubi. If he did the juubi wouldn't sustain damage since he/she/it has been warped completly .
Result of kakashi using his kamui as a method of transportation. I never said that kakashi cant do this, kakashi 100% can use his attack however he wants, its his attack. Just like I said, sasuke uses ama as defense, even though its made for the opposite. That doesnt change the fact that ama is still an attack...Your logic fails to prove anything =D.
And why would obito sustain damage?You should proof read.
Do you have dyslexia? I said that obitos
does not, ever, in under no circumstances, cause damage (at all) by using his kamui, fact .
Death by decapitation is a result of lack of blood flow to the head. not kamui.
Dumbass
A sword beheads you, what killed you? the sword or the lack of blood?
Gtfo with this sh*t
.
it only causes harm when its a partial transport. If kakashi warps a person fully then refuses to feed them its just the same as if obito warps a person fully and refuses to feed them
If kakashi fully warps someone then he is using his attack as a method of transportation, nothing more. It doesnt change the fact that his attack causes harm. Obito's kamui causes no harm to anybody once it hits the enemy
.
I can do this all day, your reasoning barely surpasses a toddler's, & you keep repeating yourself.
They die from the lack of blood/ immediate blood pressure drop.
So if a sword beheads an enemy, its the lack of blood that kills them? I thought it was the lack of having a head...U_U...? Please read over your responses before looking like an idiot.
The missing step is blood. And that's a partial warp. not an attack.
There is no missing step, the attack causes the beheading, just like a sword would. You think that blood killed the enemy instead of the sword, what are you smoking kid?
It's not an attack because of damage in misuse. It's transport. Kakashi misused it and after the tech ended the object/person/thing sustained damage. im done mechanically it doesn't cause damage. During the time the technique is active nobody takes damage. Only after the technique ends is there a chance that damage might be sustained.
Anything that causes harm is an attack. Im done elaborating & trying to justify your BS, you are 100% wrong & just cant admit it!
Kakashi's kamui is an attack, it causes harm, FTG/Obito's kamui do not cause harm to anybody when used.
Its only after the object is warped that the enemy can die.
Sasuke's amaterasu causes whatever he looks at to burn, causing damage during and after the use of the technique. His manipulation of the flames(enton) causes damage to during and after the use of the technique to anyone who touches it.
Kakashis kamui causes whatever it looks at to get distorted,
when kamui causes the damage is of no relevance. After kakashi kamui ends, a person can be dead, after obito's kamui ends
nobody can be dead, because his kamui doesnt kill anybody.
K bye loser
