[Discussion] What is your reaction when a creationist says....

[hokutoshinken]

What is wrong with you ? Don't pretend to know what you're talking about when it couldn't be further away from the actual theory *claps*

It's not from me dude, it's from evolutionists.

A almighty creator had *** with himself and gave birth to himself..... who believes that?..... Humans taught *** to bacteria, who believes that?...... To infinity and beyond.

I don't know.Who?

 

[King Of Crows]

It's not from me dude, it's from evolutionists.

No, it's not. If you have nothing smart to say then don't say anything at all -.-

 

[Anorien16]

I don't know.Who?

As far as I know none of the beings who evolved to the homo sapien species.

 

[HadouKage]

As far as I know none of the beings who evolved to the homo sapien species.

How did I become a crime fighting super hero if evolution exist? :|

 

[King Of Crows]

How did I become a crime fighting super hero if evolution exist? :|

A lot of substance abuse mixed in with a sheltered upbringing.

 

[HadouKage]

A lot of substance abuse mixed in with a sheltered upbringing.

Wrong, see evolution doesn't exist

 

[Pervy Wrath]

This:

[video=youtube;sw6ndZNLYUA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw6ndZNLYUA[/video]

 

[King Of Crows]

Wrong, see evolution doesn't exist

........Don't know if serious or messing with me _@:

 

[HadouKage]

........Don't know if serious or messing with me _@:

Oh I'm dead serious dude

 

[Anorien16]

How did I become a crime fighting super hero if evolution exist? :|

Shhhh.... ebil ebolusionists miced ebil thangs is ur tatle puud. Daads oy u r a caime phaithang chupar ero.

 

[hokutoshinken]

No, it's not. If you have nothing smart to say then don't say anything at all -.-

actually, evolution is pretty smart, but I havn't been aware of it working anywhere.

As far as I know none of the beings who evolved to the homo sapien species.

Me neither

 

[King Of Crows]

actually, evolution is pretty smart, but I havn't been aware of it working anywhere.



Me neither

The concept of evolution is true, there are many examples if you look at fossils, and the statement you said about bacteria was just silly -.-

 

[hokutoshinken]

The concept of evolution is true, there are many examples if you look at fossils, and the statement you said about bacteria was just silly -.-

Things DO have to be covered quickly to form the kind of fossils we find in the fossil record. Like jellyfish. You know? If not, do some more reading. You apparently don't know much about the process of fossilization. If you're aware of any locale on the entire earth where billions of fossils are forming slowly right now, feel free to inform the rest of us.

 

[King Of Crows]

Things DO have to be covered quickly to form the kind of fossils we find in the fossil record. Like jellyfish. You know? If not, do some more reading. You apparently don't know much about the process of fossilization. If you're aware of any locale on the entire earth where billions of fossils are forming slowly right now, feel free to inform the rest of us.

You do know that fossils have been discovered right ? You do the reading, in fact, google loves you and wants you to type some awesome questions ! First being: " Hur dur, what is evolution ? "

 

[hokutoshinken]

You do know that fossils have been discovered right ? You do the reading, in fact, google loves you and wants you to type some awesome questions ! First being: " Hur dur, what is evolution ? "

Darwin too admitted there should be "countless intermediates." So where are they?
Instead we have evolutionary "trees" that have fully formed, complex life forms at the end of their branches, but nothing in between.Some feeble attempts to construct imaginary lines of descent for horses and whales have been amply debunked.

 

[Pervy Wrath]

Darwin too admitted there should be "countless intermediates." So where are they?
Instead we have evolutionary "trees" that have fully formed, complex life forms at the end of their branches, but nothing in between.Some feeble attempts to construct imaginary lines of descent for horses and whales have been amply debunked.

I won't get too much into this, but you know that it's been a long time since Darwin lived, right? There was only so much could do and research, given his era.

 

[King Of Crows]

Darwin too admitted there should be "countless intermediates." So where are they?
Instead we have evolutionary "trees" that have fully formed, complex life forms at the end of their branches, but nothing in between.Some feeble attempts to construct imaginary lines of descent for horses and whales have been amply debunked.

The descent for horses is pretty much covered. Don't know about whales though. We don't need to see an exact time lapse of A to Z for a creatures ancestry to know that evolution exists :yayy:


P.S sorry for my earlier post on talking to google, it was quite rude

 

[Anorien16]

Darwin too admitted there should be "countless intermediates." So where are they?
Instead we have evolutionary "trees" that have fully formed, complex life forms at the end of their branches, but nothing in between.Some feeble attempts to construct imaginary lines of descent for horses and whales have been amply debunked.

What should be an in between species? let us know please.......

Also as your understanding is low enough: evolutionary trees in their short forms only lists significant specimens, various species and subspecies are reserved for longer forms of a particular. Look at the proposed homo sapien lineage, i have no idea what incomplete/inbetween species are but i think that what u are talking about.

As for countless intermidiates... here is evolution of eye:

You must be registered for see links

...... u will find plenty intermediates between the primitive and modern eye.

Also Darwins Theory was updated and upgraded long ago..... this is 2013 btw.

 

[hokutoshinken]

What should be an in between species? let us know please.......

Also as your understanding is low enough: evolutionary trees in their short forms only lists significant specimens, various species and subspecies are reserved for longer forms of a particular. Look at the proposed homo sapien lineage, i have no idea what incomplete/inbetween species are but i think that what u are talking about.

As for countless intermidiates... here is evolution of eye:

You must be registered for see links

...... u will find plenty intermediates between the primitive and modern eye.

Also Darwins Theory was updated and upgraded long ago..... this is 2013 btw.

Strange claiming from the one who don't know about the intermediates fossils missings...

Even Stephen Gould recognized that the average 'evolutionary tree' only shows fully formed creatures at the tips and nodes, but nothing in between.
Darwin know what i talk about, Stephen Gould too but Anorien who know better than me isn't aware of it...


AHHHHH!!!!! NO, NOT WIKIPEDIA! I'M UNDONE NOW! Wiki said it, I believe it, that does it.

Evolution need to explain where eyesight came from to begin with, which, by the way, requires not just eyes, but an ability to use light, transmit it to a brain, and the ability of the brain to interpret it. So, any imagined "sequence" of eye evolution has to take into account not just the structure of the eye, but musculature, a circulatory system to nourish it and keep it working, a brain to interpret and control it, and so on.

Your evolution does nothing to explain where that information to make eyes and eyesight came from in the first place. Nor does it explain how evolution "knew" we even NEEDED eyes! As if evolution looked around, saw that there was light, and then decided to invent an organ that could utilize light, but not just the organ, all the muscles, nerves, etc. that go with it, and then evolution knew just how to wire it up to the brain that evolution evolved so that the brain could see it and not only that but INTERPRET it all so that the whole organism could benefit by the ability to see light. Isn't evolution marvelous??

Ever heard of the Trilobite's eyes, which are among the most complex eyes known, appear abruptly and very early in the fossil record. That alone blows the “complexity” argument completely out of the water.

Ever seen the "evolutionary" tree of a horse? It's all in the imagination. No fact or testable, repeatable science involved at all.


They're just re-working and re-wording it to fit their mythology.The truth is that evolution explains NOTHING. WE invent the explanations and then fit them into the theory and say, "See! Evolution explains it!"

 

[Cornson]

I usually facepalm...

and ususally try to explain to them why they are so, so wrong, and if they don't lissen to my explanation to why they are wrong, but just keep chanting their rants, I start to get annoid (spelling) and when that happens, I start to pointing out why they are ignorant (this does not stop the yelling...) but it helps me feel good.