- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,969
- Reaction score
- 219
Even with your given example, the common direct ancestor being the Younger son, that would still make them close/immediate relatives for being a sibling clan, which is false because Kushina clearly stated they (the current Uzumakis) were distant blood relatives
Even if you refer to the Senjus or their descendants as Uzumakis, the fact remains that they descended from a common direct ancestor (Younger son) while the other Uzumakis (Kushina,Mito,etc) descended from Rikudou's other relatives, so any uzumaki not sharing the same direct ancestor (Elder/Younger Son) are classified as distant relatives.
Again, you assume that these "other" Uzumakis (Kushina, Mito, etc) did not descend from the YOUNGER SON. How do you know this? You claim that the Uzumaki's OLDER THAN THE SAGE is the current bloodline of the current Uzumaki's, but we both know this is an assumption. Again, please show me the manga that states the Current Uzumaki's descended from lineage outside of the Sage blood himself OR that the DIRECT FIRST CHILDREN of the Younger Son IMMEDIATELY changed their name to Senju.
But you cant. Thats why its unknown, we have no idea what generation the Younger Son's descendents started calling themselves "Senju" instead of Uzumaki. If the Younger Son children were NOT their 1st Senju, this means there are Uzumaki's alive that descended from the Younger Son specifically but are NOT considered Senju.
All I said was show me the manga where it shows the children (not grand children, great grand children, etc) of the Younger Son started calling themselves Senju and I'll believe you. If this is not true, it means that there are shinobi with the UZUMAKI clan sirname that were descended from the Younger Son, correct?