[Theory] Zoro and Conqueror's Haki

[Zorø]

But am I wrong? Did WB not also use no named attacks? Does naming your attack make it stronger?

No comment :vision:

 

[Punk Hazard]

No comment :vision:

Whatever untwists your panties.

 

[Zorø]

Whatever untwists your panties.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

 

[Bogard]

Stop saying this like it means anything. Naming your attack doesn't mean it's stronger than non-named attacks. Mihawk could be like Whitebeard, who didn't name any of his attacks.

We clearly see the iceberg cutter was just a casual swing, something you usually use in combos of other attacks in close range fights, not a finisher move. Hence it wasn't named

 

[Forbidden Tale]

Holy shite, i spend two posts explaining why the comparison between Roger pirates and mugiwara's doesn't work. All the roger pirates haki is plot device to progress the story since they all split up.

Two people with CoC on one ship is useless.

Also in what way does Rayleigh parallel Zoro, Rayleigh the calm, collected, wise, confirmed second mate versus a hot tempered, not so bright guy who only is 'rumored' to be second in command ? What is the connection that he had a sword ? If so then there are a lot of parallels to a lot of sword fighters. It didn't even appear that Rayleigh really is a swordsman like Zoro and Mihawk are. I think Rayleigh is more like Shanks where is sword is just another weapon in his big bag of tricks.

Exactly, PK - Roger - Luffy
FM - Silvers - Zoro

Who says that Mihawk is yonkou level ? Certainty not me. If he is that strong why did he became a government dog ?

But that logic, everyone who is not on yonko level should be government dog?

No, he just want to sit peacfully in his castle.

 

[NarutoBmx33]

You very selectively quoted a piece of my text and now you look like a retard.

If you actually took time and read what I wrote you would've seen that I acknowledge the existence of at least 1 crew where there are multiple people with CoC, but this isn't the adventures of Roger.

Imagine if the monster trio was swapped out with Rayleigh, Roger and Shanks. and everything would be just the same. same island, same shit. What would 2 extra people with CoC bring to the table ?

Shanks has it know because he is his own captain, it's plot device
Rayleigh has it to teach Luffy, that also was plot device
Roger most likely had it, but he is out of the picture.

So they all got CoC because they have a reason to have it. Zoro has no reason to have it. That's the point.

CoC is what makes Luffy the 'king/emperor', there is only 1 king on board the Sunny. The Pirate King.

Going full retard twice on a single forum? Duuude

And plot device? So the reason Roger was the PK was plot device to start a new pirate age? To bring up dreams of people finding One Piece?
I mean, you're right but its not just plot device. Roger was PK because he was the strongest Pirate alive. Shanks has conquerers haki because he posseses will much stronger than most people, so does Raliegh. They dont have conquerers haki just because theyre yonko or to teach Luffy, they have it because of who they are and what they did. And for that, I can see Zoro surpassing Mihawk and possessing conquerors haki. And yes, it would vw plot device to give Zoro conquerers haki because he's the right hand man of the future PK.

 

[Punk Hazard]

We clearly see the iceberg cutter was just a casual swing, something you usually use in combos of other attacks in close range fights, not a finisher move. Hence it wasn't named

We've seen Zoro use multiple named attacks and stances in conjunction to form combos. We've seen Luffy and Sanji do the same. The fact that'd be used in a combo means nothing.