- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 16,201
- Reaction score
- 1,503
IS carries out a similar attack to the ones in Paris. You have three envelopes containing three viable routes of action, pick one and state your reasons for picking.
Envelope A) Try and talk IS into backing down. Your Defence minister points out this route is unlikely to be successful, and endangers your people for an extended period of time.
Envelope B) Use a tactical offence. DM says that it's almost guaranteed to stop further attacks on your country for a long period of time, though he points a 20% risk of civilians in the area being hit. These (blindly) support IS.
Envelope C) Obliterate every trace of their being using "whatever means necessary". DM points out the obvious; that whilst ISIS will be destroyed completely, there's almost guaranteed to be thousands of civilians killed. 60% support IS, and 40% don't.
Envelope A) Try and talk IS into backing down. Your Defence minister points out this route is unlikely to be successful, and endangers your people for an extended period of time.
Envelope B) Use a tactical offence. DM says that it's almost guaranteed to stop further attacks on your country for a long period of time, though he points a 20% risk of civilians in the area being hit. These (blindly) support IS.
Envelope C) Obliterate every trace of their being using "whatever means necessary". DM points out the obvious; that whilst ISIS will be destroyed completely, there's almost guaranteed to be thousands of civilians killed. 60% support IS, and 40% don't.
You must be registered for see images
Last edited:
