[Discussion] You think the chemical attack is fake and if not will there be war?

[Donald J Trump]

You think it was faked?Remember these things have been faked before so there is a chance this is just some sort of plan by the Government.If it is not fake and if America ignores Russia's warning you think they will go to war?It will be Russia and China vs Usa and Uk. Most of the Asian country near Russia support Russia and so do a lot of the European since Russia is a energy powerhouse.

WW3?

Make sure you have emergency stacks of popcorn!

 

[SoupAddicttt]

Chemical attack? Enlighten me, please.

 

[YowYan]

Faked? Idk, I haven't seen actual footage from the warzone but one thing is certain.. (to me), this was planned for the west to have a reason to invade Syria. Like they did in Irak, Iran, Afghanistan, Libiya and Vietnam.

 

[xREIBIx]

Something does seem fishy about it, b/c all I've seen in the news and online is the U.S. just threating Syria. It's all just political B.S. I believe.

 

[Aotsuki Katsumi]

Syria is not important enough to warrant a war between the greater nations of the west and east, so that´s not a real concern. What could happen would be a really escalated conflict over even greater parts of the Middle-East if Iran decides to stop the americans, though even that holds just a vague chance of happening.

I´m pretty sure there´s been chemical warfare used in the conflict since little else can cause such effects on large groups of the population, and the regime seems more likely to have used them since they have more capability of launching them, but there are rebel factions who´ve raided and presumably captured facilities known to produce or otherwise harbour chemical weaponry, and not every rebel group is as righteous as the rebellion was earlier sadly.

 

[Untamed]

is this fake??? I think it is.. <.< staged.
[video=youtube;YfwHYSpoIEs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfwHYSpoIEs[/video]

 

[DeadManWonderLand]

Faked? Idk, I haven't seen actual footage from the warzone but one thing is certain.. (to me), this was planned for the west to have a reason to invade Syria. Like they did in Irak, Iran, Afghanistan, Libiya and Vietnam.

The U.S. is not the only country who want Bashar something gone.

With that said,i see where you are coming from and it does look ridiculously bad.

 

[LR3W]

It's not fake ..believe me.. I do live in Syria precisely 20 KM away from the chemical attack region!
Although , it's not fake but surprisingly we are safe ,IDK if it's kinda wierd to say but obviously it's not "Sarin Gas"
regarding the fact that the wind speed was about 15km "u do the math!"
As for the culprit it's kinda safe to assume that "Terrorist groups" are behind it .. simply because they did the same shity thing in another area "Khan AL Assal" near Aleppo to b exact 5 months ago , and it's not like the Regime is that naive to do so considering the "United Nation Detectives presence"!

 

[Krauq]

I'm on this forum that says there is insufficient evidence for the attack and that the USA is bad and full of Jews.

 

[DeadManWonderLand]

Syria is not important enough to warrant a war between the greater nations of the west and east, so that´s not a real concern. What could happen would be a really escalated conflict over even greater parts of the Middle-East if Iran decides to stop the americans, though even that holds just a vague chance of happening.

I´m pretty sure there´s been chemical warfare used in the conflict since little else can cause such effects on large groups of the population, and the regime seems more likely to have used them since they have more capability of launching them, but there are rebel factions who´ve raided and presumably captured facilities known to produce or otherwise harbour chemical weaponry, and not every rebel group is as righteous as the rebellion was earlier sadly.

If the military is indeed responsible then Iran needs to get its act together and figure out what there going to do.
If they attack Isreal and learn the truth after the fact,then they will look pretty stupid.

Although,trying to keep connections while at the same time diffusing a serious situation giving their stance of chemical warfare i can understand their concerns.

 

[accept pain]

totally propaganda against bashar al asad and his government...he himself said that how can we use chemical attacks on those places where our army is present...said in an interview to russain magazine..
more importantly UN also approved that chemical attacks are used by terrorists and on the other hand the people and the army are with his leader against america.

 

[DeadManWonderLand]

I'm on this forum that says there is insufficient evidence for the attack and that the USA is bad and full of Jews.

If that is true,if you really don't know what the United States is, then your best course of action would to be to tread lightly.

 

[Krauq]

If that is true,if you really don't know what the United States is, then your best course of action would to be to tread lightly.

I live in the United States, I'm not sure whether there was an attack or it was faked. But there seems to be evidence for the attack.

 

[Blondephile]

I thought the Germans used Chemical gases on WW1.

so as you can see chemicals attacks are not new!

 

[accept pain]

I live in the United States, I'm not sure whether there was an attack or it was faked. But there seems to be evidence for the attack.

did you see vary before your eye?

 

[Krauq]

I thought the Germans used Chemical gases on WW1.

so as you can see chemicals attacks are not new!

Chemical weapons are prohibited if you're part of the UN.

 

[KGB Kakuzu]

The Chemical attacks are more than likely real; however, a war is 50/50.


On one side, we have little economic advantages or other ties with Syria. As such, from this prospective, there is no use for war.

However, America places a Screen Image of being a defender of peace and justice, and to protect an image, it is possible that war would be the result.

 

[Hunty]

We can not make assumptions just yet.

If a nuclear war was to outbreak, we would know before it happened. Precautions would be taken for that type of situation. If it was spontaneous and out of the blue it would be fatal. Considering WW1 was highly inefficient, they didn't have the technology that we have produced over the years.. We have been developing different tactics and defenses against this situation - but that does not mean we can fully evade this situation.

It could happen today or tomorrow, maybe even the next day. It might not ever happen.

We'll just have to wait and see.

 

[Blondephile]

Chemical weapons are prohibited if you're part of the UN.

That law was passed after WW1, plus the UN was founded after WW2.

 

[Blondephile]

look at this picks:

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images