Would you...

[trollkingx]

Would you kill a terrorist if he/she cant defend themselves and no punishment

 

[The Necromancer]

If it saves the lives of at least 2 people, then yes.

 

[Xēnovia.]

Hmm, to prevent a nuclear war than yes.​

 

[Shanks]

Do you know how to kill a terrorist ?

 

[Darkdro]

If it saves the lives of at least 2 people, then yes.

2nd This. .

 

[The Necromancer]

Do you know how to kill a terrorist ?

It's the same as killing anyone else...

 

[trollkingx]

Do you know how to kill a terrorist ?

Im just saying if their lives were in your hands

 

[trollkingx]

If it saves the lives of at least 2 people, then yes.

You dont know the outcome it might it might not

 

[SSU]

If it saves the lives of at least 2 people, then yes.

Why at least 2? What if they intended to harm someone innocent


OT: If they have a goal of harming someone and have the power to do so then yes.

 

[Corgi]

Does it have to be a terrorist? Cause I'd kill anyone.

 

[Sir Blades]

I would make them kill themselves. I wouldn't stain my hands with garbage.

 

[Ultimate Beast]

There is always a price to pay for taking a life, you will have to live with that for the rest of your life. I will decapitate him and turn him in for further questioning.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

I've thought about this. I would love to kill a terrorist. Especially if they're using terror for their religion. And I would love to make them suffer first. No quick death if I can avoid it. Something like this would give me the biggest boner
[video=youtube_share;aaZdFQcKvjk]http://youtu.be/aaZdFQcKvjk[/video]

 

[Ch3rryNin]

Would you kill a terrorist if he/she cant defend themselves and no punishment

..........

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

I'm not entirely sure. It's a conundrum. You'd be killing a killer. Kinda paradoxical, in a way.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

I'm not entirely sure. It's a conundrum. You'd be killing a killer. Kinda paradoxical, in a way.

You could look at it as you were righteous and that your actions would likely save many lives. Or you could kill them because you can. Either is fine in this case since there's no consequences in this scenario

 

[trollkingx]

You could look at it as you were righteous and that your actions would likely save many lives. Or you could kill them because you can. Either is fine in this case since there's no consequences in this scenario

there are always consequences

 

[Cunning Linguist]

there are always consequences

Not in this completely hypothetical scenario.

 

[Ch3rryNin]

"I've thought about this. I would love to kill a terrorist. Especially if they're using terror for their religion. And I would love to make them suffer first. No quick death if I can avoid it." By The Hero NB Needs.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Cunning Linguist]

"I've thought about this. I would love to kill a terrorist. Especially if they're using terror for their religion. And I would love to make them suffer first. No quick death if I can avoid it." By The Hero NB Needs.

You must be registered for see images

Did I ever specify Muslims? Plenty of different people are terrorists because of religion.