Equalist
Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 454
- Reaction score
- 11
I was looking for another word as I was busy. Why not argue with shelke like this?
I did from pages 5 to 7. Unfortunately Shelke cannot be reasoned with logically. The issues he has with women stem from some manner of trauma and as such his phobia has become the object of his hatred. He cannot be reasoned with because his inferiority complex has become inverted and thus he believes he is superior to women despite the fact that he feels inferior to them. He's overcompensating for his own shortcomings and must be made to see that we are all equal. My posts have become aggressive because his case is aggressive. Indeed, unlike any I've ever seen. So I've turned to something experimental and yet still I am at a loss.
If you had been responding to him like this there would have been a more entertaining argument for me to read.
The fact that you think this thread is about what entertains you is an indication that you are shallow and uncultured. After all if it is entertainment you seek I'm sure there are a number of hobbies out there which you may investigate. But you choose not to.
My posts try to prove that we have already reached equality? If I ever posted something like that I need a brick to the face because I believe Men and Women are far from equality.
I never said that your posts try to prove that we have reached equality. Read what is actually said and not what you contrived. I said that your posts aim to argue that we are all equal. Not that we have reached a state of equality. Men and women are different sexes of homosapien. They are separate but equal. However we do not live in a state of equality because equality is society's recognition that men and women are equal. To make this easy for you to understand we are equal. However, society i.e. the system we all created does not recognize this fact and as such there is no equality.
I argued that your posts aim to assert that we are equal but you have failed every step of the way in proving that. I never argued that your posts prove we live in a state of equality. And so I reiterate: the further you pursue this matter in ignorance the more you labor to prove Shelke is correct and you do his job for him. In protesting against his arguments you prove Shelke is completely infallible. Thus making this discussion more taxing for me and more damning for women everywhere.
Do you understand what I have said to you?
