[Debate] Women shouldn't be allowed in combat

[King Of Crows]

You must be registered for see images

Damn, **** just got real.

You must be registered for see images

 

[FuChomei]

I am flabbergasted the level of non-sense that is grossly rampant in this thread. Hand to hand or handling guns; there is no contest. Women cannot perform at optimum level compared to men given the biological differences. Kindly open a few books to understand how guns works. The constant recoil effect from the gun alone would wear a woman out much faster than man given his superior muscle fibers. It's as if no one has seen a single physics book here. My God!

Women shouldn't be allowed in the army in the combat division as they would take up the positions that could be filled up by men. That's that.

Thank you for living up to what feminist would like to beat with a pipe.

 

[shelke]

I'm flabbergasted at the level of non-sense that is your post.

I am terribly hurt given your utter lack of any counter.

Women aren't taking up positions that can be filled by men. Know why? Because there aren't any men in those positions. If a man has the rank of anything from infantry to general he has that rank. A woman can't take a spot unless that spot is there. Your ridiculous, borderline retarded argument is just what I'd expect from those slackjawed, bumpkins who complain about immigrants taking their jobs when you're unemployed anyway.

With regards to the army or the marines I don't see you enlisting so obviously no one is taking your spot now are they? For the duration of this discussion I implore you to be silent lest you do more to damage our perception of you than the generations of inbreeding that already has.

I don't take anyone's side - men or women - in any argument, period. If you are emotionally hurt by any thing I have ventured then go and show this over-emotional rant else where. My points are based on serving better in combat in regards to set-in-stone biological differences. If one *** serves better than the other shouldn't be entertained. Glad you have put out your silly post for the world to care.

 

[FuChomei]

I am terribly hurt given your utter lack of any counter.



I don't take anyone's side - men or women - in any argument, period. If you are emotionally hurt by any thing I have ventured then go and show this over-emotional rant else where. My points are based on serving better in combat in regards to set-in-stone biological differences. If one *** serves better than the other shouldn't be entertained. Glad you have put out your silly post for the world to care.

So men are ALWAYS better than women? So women shouldn't be allowed to fight no matter what skills they posses? So from what you say no woman could ever serve up to your standards in combat?

 

[Equalist]

I am terribly hurt given your utter lack of any counter.

You must be registered for see images

I don't take anyone's side - men or women - in any argument, period. If you are emotionally hurt by any thing I have ventured then go and show this over-emotional rant else where. My points are based on serving better in combat in regards to set-in-stone biological differences. If one *** serves better than the other shouldn't be entertained.

You must be registered for see images

Glad you have put out your silly post for the world to care.

The only thing you have "put out" is the fact that public education has failed you.

So men are ALWAYS better than women? So women shouldn't be allowed to fight no matter what skills they posses? So from what you say no woman could ever serve up to your standards in combat?

Don't bother. He's all talk. For someone who talks about firearms the only gun he's ever held is the peashooter he keeps in his pants.

 

[shelke]

So men are ALWAYS better than women? So women shouldn't be allowed to fight no matter what skills they posses? So from what you say no woman could ever serve up to your standards in combat?

In combat terms? Thicker skins, more Muscle, better and dense bones. All these facilitate for better combat - all these are facts. If you don't want to accpet it, then it's your loss. Which skills are we talking about here, on battle grounds? In support roles, or in terms of strategies? I am specifically highlighting Combat only. Don't veer this discussion.

 

[Equalist]

In combat terms? Thicker skins, more Muscle, better and dense bones. All these facilitate for better combat - all these are facts. If you don't want to accpet it, then it's your loss. Which skills are we talking about here, on battle grounds? In support roles, or in terms of strategies? I am specifically highlighting Combat only. Don't veer this discussion.

I'll bet you can't even fight.

 

[shelke]

@Equalist Awesome gifs. Do you actually think you are getting anywhere with those, or have managed anything? Lol I suppose mother nature has utterly failed you then.

 

[King Of Crows]

I'll bet you can't even fight.

I don't mean to intrude, but he is actually correct in terms of physical combat

 

[shelke]

I'll bet you can't even fight.

Oscar Wilde Rejoinder! Clap Clap Clap. Throw in another Neanderthal gif for a good measure. This one lacks heart.

 

[FuChomei]

Oscar Wilde Rejoinder! Clap Clap Clap. Throw in another Neanderthal gif for a good measure. This one lacks heart.

That wasn't a gif more so than a stupid argument. Neanderthal's did not have gif's they had soul

 

[Revyy]

You must be registered for see images

 

[Equalist]

I don't mean to intrude, but he is actually correct in terms of physical combat

I don't mean to intrude but martial arts says you're both wrong.

 

[FuChomei]

You must be registered for see images

I've seen him before . . . YOU HAVE A TUMBLR?!

 

[Revyy]

In combat terms? Thicker skins, more Muscle, better and dense bones. All these facilitate for better combat - all these are facts. If you don't want to accpet it, then it's your loss. Which skills are we talking about here, on battle grounds? In support roles, or in terms of strategies? I am specifically highlighting Combat only. Don't veer this discussion.

HAHHAAHAHA omg what? You can't be serious..ever heard of Tai kwon do? Judo? Easily take down people bigger than you. Speed, tacit and ability to judge help you win combat.

 

[King Of Crows]

I don't mean to intrude but martial arts says you're both wrong.

I'm talking primal physical combat. I'm not saying that men defeat women in every circumstance. Men are biologically stronger, it is just nature. <(-.-<)

 

[Equalist]

In combat terms? Thicker skins, more Muscle, better and dense bones. All these facilitate for better combat - all these are facts. If you don't want to accpet it, then it's your loss. Which skills are we talking about here, on battle grounds? In support roles, or in terms of strategies? I am specifically highlighting Combat only. Don't veer this discussion.

None of which means anything outside of the UFC. There are over 300 different forms of Kung Fu and the attributes you have listed aren't integral to the practice of any of them, let alone mastery thereof.

I'm talking primal physical combat. I'm not saying that men defeat women in every circumstance. Men are biologically stronger, it is just nature. <(-.-<)

And most animals are physically superior to humans yet homo sapiens dominate the planet. Why is that? Because combat is a science. It's not about who has the bigger **** which gives most of you a handicap anyway. No real offense behind that but I have to take a shot at someone when I see an opening.

 

[FemmeFatale]

Some woman are physically supieor to men and are just as capable in physical combat. Women make better soilder because they can blend in and silently kill the enemy. Some women are also more tactical than men.

 

[Revyy]

I'm talking primal physical combat. I'm not saying that men defeat women in every circumstance. Men are biologically stronger, it is just nature. <(-.-<)

This is why I do Judo...:x3:

@Femmefatale anybody in camouflage can do that. You won't see woman on assassination mission. There is a reason they can't join the SEALS.

 

[Equalist]

Some woman are physically supieor to men and are just as capable in physical combat. Women make better soilder because they can blend in and silently kill the enemy. Some women are also more tactical than men.

You really aren't helping.