You made it seem that since it is wrong for homosexuals that the cannot produce then why excuse infertile male and females? (A tired argument quite honestly). Which I replied that it is a sickness. It is unnatural meaning that it is not normal because biological functions are not operating as they should be. Hypothetically, if two men or women was the last people on Earth, then it would immoral for the fact the human race would die out. Is it right for human race to die? We all know morality subjective though. Why don't you answer my question that you so happened to duck?
Is it wrong for the human race to die? Let's see:
A meteor could slam into the Earth, ending not just the human race but everything living on it.
Since you love hypotheticals, let's say for some strange reason everyone ends up being born ONLY male. Reproduction is discontinued, everyone dies.
Is a meteor unethical now? Is the male *** unethical now? I'm not ducking any questions. You just don't make any sense.
Oh really? Show me in the bible where it unnatural
Show me in law where it is unethical
I don't see humans growing wings and flying in the sky
Please use logic
Lmao...planes didn't exist during the period of time the stories within the Bible were written, obviously it wouldn't mention it.
You don't see humans evolving to grow wings, making flight unnatural for us to partake in, airplanes do not exist outside of human influence, are not used outside of the human race etc, making it unnatural,
yet it is still not unethical. My point is that something being natural or unnatural is not a basic for judging human ethics or morality, period. This is simple.
Whether or not homosexuality is natural or not is irrelevant to the discussion.