You don't understand anything, you only think that you understand.
You haven't any valid facts for a start, and even state that cancers develop because of lifestyle habits when in fact, many different, deadly cancers have existed for 1000s of years, even in areas that were well developed for their time.
You state a dosage of a supplement that isn't physically absorbable will cure cancer. I have self-awareness but that does not lead to an understanding the world because no one person is the same, therefore you cannot apply your own "template" to everyone, or anyone else. My ability to understand people, society and the world transcends most because it's my inherent gift. And unlike you, I also understand the mechanics of cancer, medicine and the world.
"Harmless cancer" is an oxymoron, there is no such thing. Benign tumours are as close to "harmless" as you'll get but it would be very green to say that they pose no potential risks or problems because they do.
Cancer research and treatment costs trillions each year to carry out so no, it's a financial burden for everyone. A cure would simplify everything, cost a whole lot less to produce and increase net profit by a very large margin.
I don't even know why I'm debating with someone who thinks cancer is something that can be "flushed out", prescribes a supplement dosage that is inutile by the human body and that harmless cancers exist. If you really want to understand cancer and treatments, go and read scholarly articles, research papers etc.
Aside from getting an understanding of cancers and treatments, I have only read an upward of 30 or so peer-reviewed articles on certain cancers and treatments but I've come to understand
a lot.
And for good measure, here's an article on Burzynski's antineoplaston therapy and a test that I read a while back:
Article:
You must be registered for see links
Head to the bottom link named "[PDF] Antineoplastons"
Notable research:
You must be registered for see links