Hillary Clinton has a history of being a warhawk. So I doubt that killing people is beyond her, especially when she's calculating to get what she wants.
What's my bias? I dislike corruption and ingenuity and call out the politicians for it, including Bernie Sanders if he were such a person.
Back in 2008, I supported Hillary over Obama, but that was before I started getting into politics and found out how unscrupulous she was.
I've criticized Elizabeth Warren for supporting Clinton over Bernie and I constantly argue against Trump.
Hell, I've even made a thread just last week about Trump.
I could say the same thing about you; you're biased toward Hillary so that's where your own rhetoric tells you to point.
Everyone's biased to some degree, what matters is being able to manage that bias and still look at things from multiple perspectives. So I don't even want to hear that BS from you. That's just a straw-man argument.
The election was proven to be rigged, literally. The leaked DNC emails proved foul play and Election Justice U.S. did an investigation and concluded that Bernie lost 184 delegates because of it, which could have changed the tide of the election for him.
So I'm glad you don't care about those facts nor sympathize with Bernie supporters who were cheated and ridiculed by the establishment.
Race card? 37% of incarcerations were black people under Clinton and the U.S. had twice as many incarcerated than any other developed country at the time. GTFO. That is a fact and that is one of the biggest things the Clinton administration is criticized for.
You're denying fact by downplaying it. I never said blacks had it better before Clinton, but they still had it really really bad and the Clintons only added more to the problem of which we're still seeing the effects of it today.
Do you even understand what a surplus means? It's not always a good thing. A government surplus means that the government is taking in more money than it's investing....Public and private finances don't work the same way.
People think debt=bad and surplus=good. That's not always the case, the economy isn't a simple black and white palette. Just like with everything there needs to be a balance and too much of something is never good. Having tax money lying around is not a popular way to do things in government because it is someone else's money the government is sitting on.
Creating jobs is not the end all be all. Just because jobs exist does not mean the economy is booming. Jobs can exist while also paying low wages, which is exactly what happened during Bill's presidency as I previously mentioned.
Your last two points are wholly untrue.
Bill Clinton didn't do anything to really help the economy, he just added more to the bubble which later burst. That's exactly how economic crashes happen. It's an illusion of prosperity. Bill Clinton may not have been the sole cause of both of the crashes, but he was a big player in it.
Again I'll post my source since you've obviously not bothered with it.
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
[video=youtube;r7nAwQpIQ6M]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7nAwQpIQ6M[/video]
You didn't argue facts dude....which is why I'm fact-checking you.
So by your logic we should not hold Clinton accountable for anything just because she's running against Trump? Trump is currently in the process of self-imploding as it is.
You're using the "Trump" card to distract from Hillary's own corrupt activities instead of acknowledging them just like with any other politician.
