Wich kind of population is easier to manipulate religious one or atheist one???..

minamoto

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
22,577
Kin
25,811💸
Kumi
11,914💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
i--------------->.

recardless of society's level of edocation and culture and stuf like dat ...

wich kind of popolation is easier to manipolate ...a roligious one or a atheist one?????..
 

salamander uchiha

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
17,628
Kin
9,043💸
Kumi
6,082💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Neither, it's down to individualism vs collectivism. The difference is religion recognises indivudal rights and judgement, that leads to more branches, so it will be harder. The only atheist states I can think of were communist and they believe the collective overrules the individual. And Mao had his commie enforcers out there doing their things, the Soviets theirs etc. It seems it was a lot easier to manipulate the latter, but it also required iron will. That is if I was to pick one of the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Troi

Chikombo

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
7,420
Kin
9,371💸
Kumi
1,003💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Well some religous people think they should blindly do whatever their religion tells them to do no matter what so, if someone could manipulate the scriptures that's one thing.

I think religion can make people more sure of what to think of the world, I mean that in a positive way.
 

Infant

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
1,949
Kin
5,794💸
Kumi
1,695💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Theres falsely religious (in a way, these are the properly religious kind) and truly religious kinds. The same applies to atheists.

Falsely religious are those who are simply in it to look good, but dont really know/care about the foundationanl beliefs/doctrines. These are somewhat controllable as long as you know what practices they abide by or you know why they pretend as they do (social acceptance, political benefits etc). The truly religious (aka the spiritual) are impossible to control but nearly perfectly predicatable because of absolute principles that they follow. You cant tell them what to do, but you always know it. So you can work with/around them easier, but never control.

With atheists, its the opposite. Truly atheistic are very critical and cautious of things and so are difficult to manipulate to go to extremes, but you can influence their dialogue to manipulate them moderately. Falsely atheistic are mostly caught up in the idea of non-conformism and dont really understand much of the religion they're rejecting, so these notions are easily manipulated but the same sense of non-conformity means they can 'wake up' at any time to change teams.

In terms of ease of control, the truly religious are the most difficult, practically impossible to manipulate, but most straightforward to understand in patterns. The truly atheistic come next because they still have thay genuine factor, buttheir thinking can still be influenced. The falsely atheistic come next because the notions they play with are easily manipulated, but the nature of their game always gives them a chance of getting free. The falsely religious are the easiest because the very reasons of their pretence are usually tied to politics anyway and these reasons are so instinctive that they are unlikely to break free without genuinely supernatural intervention.
 

minamoto

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
22,577
Kin
25,811💸
Kumi
11,914💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Theres falsely religious (in a way, these are the properly religious kind) and truly religious kinds. The same applies to atheists.

Falsely religious are those who are simply in it to look good, but dont really know/care about the foundationanl beliefs/doctrines. These are somewhat controllable as long as you know what practices they abide by or you know why they pretend as they do (social acceptance, political benefits etc). The truly religious (aka the spiritual) are impossible to control but nearly perfectly predicatable because of absolute principles that they follow. You cant tell them what to do, but you always know it. So you can work with/around them easier, but never control.

With atheists, its the opposite. Truly atheistic are very critical and cautious of things and so are difficult to manipulate to go to extremes, but you can influence their dialogue to manipulate them moderately. Falsely atheistic are mostly caught up in the idea of non-conformism and dont really understand much of the religion they're rejecting, so these notions are easily manipulated but the same sense of non-conformity means they can 'wake up' at any time to change teams.

In terms of ease of control, the truly religious are the most difficult, practically impossible to manipulate, but most straightforward to understand in patterns. The truly atheistic come next because they still have thay genuine factor, buttheir thinking can still be influenced. The falsely atheistic come next because the notions they play with are easily manipulated, but the nature of their game always gives them a chance of getting free. The falsely religious are the easiest because the very reasons of their pretence are usually tied to politics anyway and these reasons are so instinctive that they are unlikely to break free without genuinely supernatural intervention.
but u can use religion to manipulate religious societies so easily ...no???..
 

Chikombo

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
7,420
Kin
9,371💸
Kumi
1,003💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I think if you tell people "A is religious", atheists might back away, and "B is not religious" Atheists might join, except the meaning could be the opposite, making us suckers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Infant
Top