Why should I believe in the God?

[Arian]

Wow, you really are an idiot. You're so insistent on religious people being devoid of knowledge, anything that comes out of their mouth (even if it's in agreement to some of the points you've made) has to be disregarded. And this is why the Creation debate never goes anywhere. Because you truly believe your side is the only one capable of making valid points. Believe me, if there was enough evidence to completely dismiss every religion, the only ones who would still believe either live under a rock or actually are as stupid as you think we all are. But know, the only one uneducated on the debate is you, and I'm sorry it took me this long to realize you were just a troll and interested only in insulting believers and not having an intelligent conversation with them.

And I've seen those videos before, by the way. I know about evolution and don't doubt its existence. And Carrier has the same problem that you do, so why would I take anything he says seriously?

now thats convenient for you isnt it? he had some pretty educated and valid points. facts which you cant deny. so of course youre not even gonna debate that at all, just say "bro he sucks like you" lol

you clearly havent seen those vids. at least not completely. if you did youd know the following: like how flawed the human brain is. how those flaws basically make you religious. your brain is hardwired that way. how flawed and unoriginal the bible is. and the list goes on and on. but of course thats all bullshit right? you, like all christians/moslems etc have pretty convenient explanations to pretty much everything. every scientific research which debunks religion is automatically wrong according to you, while conveniently you accept other stuff like evolution and try to find them in some far fetched intepretation of some parts of the bible (adam and eve=evolution according to you)because else youd look like a totall idiot denying facts. im sorry but those are just excuses over excuses trying to make the bible trustworthy enough for people nowadays. the only reason the creation debates goes nowhere is because of this bro:

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

 

[Marin]

We've got Hawker 2.0 here. ^ :lol

 

[Punk Hazard]

you guys got it wrong. it wasnt shemale. i was talking about a transgender. i said if i hooked up with a hot girl who later revealed she was a guy i wouldnt mind that at all. why would i. its not like i was seduced by that thought or her manlyness, but by her hot looks etc as if it was just a regular girl. why would i bother about what she used to be, when theres a hot girl in front of me? but i dont expect you guys to understand that lol



actually id doesnt really matter that much. the point is the exponentional growth which we are unable to grasp unless we calculate it. of course were talking hypothetically. you cant fold a paper more than a few times. but if you take a simple regular paper and fold it like 42 times you would get the distance to the moon. and it only requires 50 more folds to have the width of the observable universe....

Spoiler

[video=youtube;AmFMJC45f1Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmFMJC45f1Q[/video]

Fam, tHere's no need to explain yourself. People wHo stay concerned with what kind of ass anotHer grown man is getting just sHow tHey're getting none tHemselves.

 

[Legendary Saiyan]

you guys got it wrong. it wasnt shemale. i was talking about a transgender. i said if i hooked up with a hot girl who later revealed she was a guy i wouldnt mind that at all. why would i. its not like i was seduced by that thought or her manlyness, but by her hot looks etc as if it was just a regular girl. why would i bother about what she used to be, when theres a hot girl in front of me? but i dont expect you guys to understand that lol

I know it was a transgender or at least transsexual. Not a shemale o.o

Fam, tHere's no need to explain yourself. People wHo stay concerned with what kind of ass anotHer grown man is getting just sHow tHey're getting none tHemselves.

Maybe true for some but that ain't me.

 

[lagala]

In the begginning, there was a singularity (probably), which rapidlly expanded (for reasons unknown), and over trillions of years, stars and planets slowly formed by stuff clumping together, and on one out of quintillions of these planets, the conditions for life were met and then a lot of stuff happened. Now please do actual research before posting. Or you will end up just like me.

We invent unprovable, untestable stories about how matter came from the period, which came from nothing, meaning matter came from nothing, which we deny because then we'd have to come up with what was there before the period, which was nothing, so we just say the period popped into existence, and we don't worry about what was there before that. get it? oh, and we also call the period a "singularity" because that makes us sound smart.

You say we have controlled and tested the complete process from Big Bang to Bob? Can you document that for us, please? I mean, I've not heard of the Big Bang being repeated and tested in the lab. Nor have I heard that any researchers were able to take a few particles from the Big Bang and make them into the universe and every living thing on earth. If you know differently, please, please inform the rest of us. Otherwise, I guess you'll just have to admit that what you believe, you believe by faith.

 

[Arian]

We invent unprovable, untestable stories about how matter came from the period, which came from nothing, meaning matter came from nothing, which we deny because then we'd have to come up with what was there before the period, which was nothing, so we just say the period popped into existence, and we don't worry about what was there before that. get it? oh, and we also call the period a "singularity" because that makes us sound smart.

You say we have controlled and tested the complete process from Big Bang to Bob? Can you document that for us, please? I mean, I've not heard of the Big Bang being repeated and tested in the lab. Nor have I heard that any researchers were able to take a few particles from the Big Bang and make them into the universe and every living thing on earth. If you know differently, please, please inform the rest of us. Otherwise, I guess you'll just have to admit that what you believe, you believe by faith.

id rather trust the words of scientists who actually know their shit and are researching over the
"Science" religion spreads though

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

We invent unprovable, untestable stories about how matter came from the period, which came from nothing, meaning matter came from nothing, which we deny because then we'd have to come up with what was there before the period, which was nothing, so we just say the period popped into existence, and we don't worry about what was there before that. get it? oh, and we also call the period a "singularity" because that makes us sound smart.

You say we have controlled and tested the complete process from Big Bang to Bob? Can you document that for us, please? I mean, I've not heard of the Big Bang being repeated and tested in the lab. Nor have I heard that any researchers were able to take a few particles from the Big Bang and make them into the universe and every living thing on earth. If you know differently, please, please inform the rest of us. Otherwise, I guess you'll just have to admit that what you believe, you believe by faith.

Shut up.



Don't expect anything more. That's all we know. We don't know how it all went. We most likely never will. Its just that most people prefer the answer "I don't know" to "An unfathomable superbeing did it"