Why is this manga constantly contradicting itself.
1: Kishi originally made hiruzen the strongest hokage, and then goes on to make hashirama seem the strongest. He also makes the 4th hokage seem invincible by all the praise he receives from Anko and Raikage for example.
2: Flashbacks for 599 can not happen within the timeline due to kakashi participating in the chunin exams and passing at age 6, while gai graduated from the academy at 7, and asuma/kurenai graduated at age 9. Kakashi couldn't of fought against gai if he was still in the academy.
3: Byakugan was said to be the dojutsu sharingan came from, but that turned out to be false.
There's plenty more, it just gets old reading the manga and seeing how it contradicts things stated previously. This a book, any author worth his salt isn't going to contradict himself but its clear he didn't even plan out his story well into the end. I still love naruto and will continue reading it until the end, but I just hate seeing inconsistencies throughout the manga.
1: Kishi originally made hiruzen the strongest hokage, and then goes on to make hashirama seem the strongest. He also makes the 4th hokage seem invincible by all the praise he receives from Anko and Raikage for example.
2: Flashbacks for 599 can not happen within the timeline due to kakashi participating in the chunin exams and passing at age 6, while gai graduated from the academy at 7, and asuma/kurenai graduated at age 9. Kakashi couldn't of fought against gai if he was still in the academy.
3: Byakugan was said to be the dojutsu sharingan came from, but that turned out to be false.
There's plenty more, it just gets old reading the manga and seeing how it contradicts things stated previously. This a book, any author worth his salt isn't going to contradict himself but its clear he didn't even plan out his story well into the end. I still love naruto and will continue reading it until the end, but I just hate seeing inconsistencies throughout the manga.
