1) UFO sightings
This argument in fact works against your theory of alien live and you don't even seem to be aware of it. It's not "4 million times a UFO was sighted" it's "4 million times people thought they saw a UFO" which is something very different. It has been scientifically proven that the human mind wants to see order and structure, it hates things it can't understand and will automatically turn them into things they can understand, no matter how ridiculous they might be. Everyone by now will have read some of the more popular tests like how if you keep the first and last letter of a word and scramble the other letters randomly, you still will be able to read it because your mind will turn it into something you are familiar with. This is a simple test, but this happens on all levels of your mind. Most of these sightings were not of people who clearly saw UFO's, but people who saw something they could not understand and decided that it must be a UFO because that's what they wanted to see.
It's not a coincidence that most of these sightings have been made in a relatively short time span and that you can see an increase whenever there's a UFO mania going around. When you go a bit back in time, you will have barely any because the believe in alien life is still very recent. In the past they did the exact same thing only with the things they were familiar with "I saw an angel", "the devil tried to seduce me", "Helios is riding with his chariot through the sky", "a dragon egg fell out of the moon" etc.
That after 4 million supposed sightings nothing has progressed at all, says enough. If most of these people really saw UFO's, you wouldn't be needing all this extremely poor excuses for arguments. The reality is that human eyewitnesses are unreliable, no matter how certain they themselves believe to be. If sightings were enough, then the monster of Loch Ness and Big Foot exist and Elvis is still very well alive while Jesus apparently is spending his free time making his face appear on pancakes and cookies.
These sightings tell more about the people who sighted them then about the aliens themselves. It has even been proven that you can make people believe they preformed certain actions which they never did. The human mind is easily influenced. After 4 millions sightings we are as far as we were when the first one was made, then you know they're pretty much worthless.
Fact: this argument can be discarded. That you even bother to use stuff like this, says enough. People see what they want to see.
2) The Egyptian pyramids
Instead of believing some half-assed crackpot theories you randomly picked from the internet from conspiracy junkies who have never held a book about ancient Egypt, actually bother to learn a bit of their history instead of being so gullible. If you did then you would know that, unlike that weird impression people like you have that the great pyramids fell from the sky in a time were people barely could distinguish their face from their ass, there was actually an evolutionary process. They learned. The biggest advantage our species have is our ingenuity and our ability to adapt and learn. The very first "pyramids" were small structures no bigger than a regular house, but throughout the course of the centuries they learned through trial and error to perfect their building techniques. Egypt is full of pyramids which clearly show this learning process, there are even several prime examples of mistakes where they used the experience of the mistake, adapted and then found a solution for the next pyramid. The great pyramids didn't fall from thin air, they were the result of centuries of evolution where they started small and used their experience to simply become better at it.
This is the thing that annoys me the most about the people who bring crap like this up. It's not that I don't believe in alien life, in fact I'm 100% certain it's there, but this reasoning is plain BS. "I believe that mankind is waaaaaaaaaaay too stupid to solve some minor practical issues, despite the fact that this is the greatest quality our species has, so I'm going to replace that by an even more dumber explanation and that's aliens! Because yeah we need an extremely advanced species of another planet to make a bunch of useless stone buildings".
Yes the Egyptians were very well capable of making the pyramids. People in Britain also moved the stones for Stonehenge, which they found traces of. That Egyptians, who were much further advanced, could do it likewise, is easily possible. There are countless of acceptable theories as how they did it, the difference however with the people who made these theories, is that they are critical for themselves and that they want to find the correct way and thus are not going to sprout baseless nonsense. You are just sucking things out of your thumb and act blind, deaf and dumb to everything unless it suits you.
Fact: Useless argument, can be completely discarded. You are essentially replacing an explanation you deem unlikely despite existing proof by an explanation that's borderline retarded and baseless.
3) Egyptian drawings
Really? Really? If I draw you having improper conduct with a penguin and hang it up my wall, does that somehow become truth? If humanity perishes and a new civilization discovers a thousand years from now Japanese tentacle porn, does that mean all Japanese women had *** with octopi that somehow had human penises? You are using the drawings of a civilization whose culture disappeared millennia ago and whose writing was unreadable till the 19th century as proof of aliens? A civilization whose believes, religion and state of mind was completely different than that of ours? They also made drawings of how they made the pyramids, but you easily disregarded those in your previous argument. They also made drawings of persons with the heads of a crocodile, jackal and a hippo, so should we assume there was once a race of demi-humans?
Fact: Useless argument, can be completely discarded. You're essentially interpreting a drawing that was made thousands of years ago by someone you do not know nor why it was made nor what it even means. You just conveniently chose one amongst many possibilities because it suits you ignoring all reason completely.
4) Stonehenge
Already brought this up, again "we, the highly developed alien race which can travel at the speed of light, will learn these people to...stack some rocks". Unlike you claim they tested successfully ways of how they could have build it. However unlike people like you they don't jump to conclusions so easily. Again there are several possible theories, but they want to know the real one. The problem is that there are very little remains left, which makes it difficult to determine what now the correct method was and thus they are careful with what they're saying instead of blurting things out baselessly.
Fact: Useless argument, they could very well do it and it has been proven it was possible. The problem is that it's not certain that even a certain method is possible, they actually used it. What is true however that an alien involvement is completely baseless other than the pathetic argument "I don't believe they could do it, so aliens".
5) Black satellite
Never heard of it, but based on what you just described, the only thing you can do at this point is laugh really really hard. "We don't know what it is, we have never seen it, but somehow we do know it's a satellite, it's black, it's 14 000 years old, it's 4 times faster than the fastest ship, it functions and must be made by aliens"...what is wrong with you? It's not that people can't explain it, but unlike you they are not going to randomly assume things until they know more before they formulate theories. Not everyone follows the reasoning "I think humans are too stupid to move and stack square stones, so aliens".
Your own explanation is completely contradictory to itself as if all of that was true, it should be rather simple to get a hold of it. The reality is probably that, like so many other things, there is barely an info on it to formulate an acceptable theory. That's how it works, but some people probably started blindly assuming things again that suit themselves. There are several examples of people receiving unexplainable signals, used that as proof that aliens existed till it became clear it was something completely different, often something very simple like the waves of a microwave oven.
6) Life in prison
And how do you know that? If an astronaut spreads the word he found alien life, then it would be impossible to contain that in our current society. The moment something is on the internet, it's on the internet. If that astronaut then suddenly is sentenced to live in prison, people are going to notice and riot. This is really one of those things that almost certainly was spread intentionally for the sake of making this retarded argument or in the least got intentionally twisted. I can very well imagine that there are protocols for astronauts to follow in the hypothetical case they would encounter an alien. That's nothing more than common sense, imagine that they would carry infections or bacteria not present in our world that could cause a mass extinction because we are not resistant to it or vice versa. And when someone break these protocols and gets punished for it, is also logical. If you disobey a command in the army, you will be punished too. But that someone would be thrown for life in prison because he said there are aliens is really typical for some a crackpot conspiracy theorist, that everyone who knows the 'truth' mysteriously disappears ~_~
No this is not real, this is the kind of toilet paper you use to wipe your ass with when you have nearly liquid diarrhea. YOU search it up. YOU actually try to bother for once to read a book on ancient Egypt or Stonehenge rather than mimicking like a parrot dubious stuff you found somewhere on the internet created by people who are desperate to believe that they get anally probed each night by aliens.
You are free to believe what you want. The reality is that even the most skeptical scientist using the most skeptical of all odds can do nothing else then admit there should be alien life somewhere as even the most unlikely of all odds would mean there should be countless of planets with life on them. That's how vast the universe is. However that there is life, doesn't mean automatically intelligent life. Intelligent life doesn't automatically mean it's highly advanced life, highly advanced life doesn't mean they know of our existence and even if they do, that doesn't they want to come to us.
If you want to believe that your mind is so simple it can't understand common sense and that stacking a bunch of blocks is far too difficult for you, be my guest. But that does not mean that that applies to the rest of us, so stop insulting and disgracing the ingenuity of your own species and its history by assuming with these BS arguments that they were too dumb and that they needed the help of aliens. You question things that easily can and have been explained and done by humans in favor of another species you have never seen, met or doesn't even have a single shred of proof of its existence. That's plainly sad.
If you don't stop with crap like, you will be removed from this section as you ignore all common sense and reason and then, without any kind of argumentation, bring forth ridiculous assumptions you proclaim as truth. That's poison for the mind. That's why people laugh at you. Not because of the idea you believe aliens exist, but the arguments you use to proof that. If you would follow the correct, objective approach, which is what most scientists do, no one would bat an eye. But of course if you do that, then you would know that all of what you wrote is completely bogus. It's not so much the fact that you want that aliens exist, but that they visited us. I really don't get why I bother writing all this stuff. Someone who falls back on a 4000 year old drawing of God knows what as proof is already a lost cause.
Evolution inherently supports the idea of alien live. Frankly alien live is far more problematic for the idea of creation than it is for evolution.
Actually it's not even slave labour anymore. The more Egyptologists research it, the more proof keeps surfacing that it weren't slaves, but professional craftsmen who were the ones who build the pyramids. This hypothesis has especially gained a lot of credibility the past few years.
