HowDidIGetPrem
Active member
Awards
The person that built the foundations for everything or the person that fleshed out and completed everything the first set up?
Who's the smartest person ever?
- Thread starter HowDidIGetPrem
- Start date
HowDidIGetPrem
Active member
Awards
It's likely the builder would've built little or nothing if not for the the founder though.
The founder. Without the founder, the builder would've been lost about what to build and would be useless LOL. Also creating things involve being creative so they could probably get a good foundation after drawing out the layouts with basic physics and building experience, the builder adds to it and makes it nicer.
Both are smart because the builder has to figure out the flaws in it and know how to fix it. However, the founder was the one who got it started and knew how to make it into an actual thing
Both are smart because the builder has to figure out the flaws in it and know how to fix it. However, the founder was the one who got it started and knew how to make it into an actual thing
Ansatsuken
Active member
Awards
Ansatsuken
Active member
Awards
salamander uchiha
Active member
A sturdy building can only be build on a solid foundation. Even if the builder makes some errors as long as the foundation is solid the build will hold up, and can even be repaired, so 
GrapeApe
Active member
Awards
so i would say the builder
right like you dont necessarily have to be smart in context of like being the founder of a country, you just have to be curious, be the first one to find something by chance or have the resources. people originated in Africa then just kind of ventured off to see what else was there. a lot of countries that are here were founded from someone having superior numbers or technology in a battle. not because they were super intelligent. i would say the builder is smarter in that context because they saw how to improve and expand that and make it last. one thing i liked about Europe when i traveled there is everything is so old compared to the U.S. or Australia, like its been around a really long time, because of builders
even like with art and music. a lot of stuff is founded off experimentation and chance more than like purposeful. outside of like Brian Eno with ambient music and Picasso with Cubism. most people were trying to create something else, like rock music they were just trying to make faster blues, house music they were trying to make disco, the list goes on, it just happened to be different enough that it needed a different name for marketing. even scales and colors, someone was like if i hit this note and it makes this sound, lets build on that a name the sounds and structure the ones that go together in a key
bruh even a house, you dont have to be super smart to realize you need shelter from the weather, even animals can do that, thats instinct. everything structured has some sort of foundation but you dont need high intelligence for that like i said. you do need more intelligence to go from, huts >house> mansion >buildings>towers
improving things takes a lot of smarts at certain point. more so than founding so yeah, im a go with builders
right like you dont necessarily have to be smart in context of like being the founder of a country, you just have to be curious, be the first one to find something by chance or have the resources. people originated in Africa then just kind of ventured off to see what else was there. a lot of countries that are here were founded from someone having superior numbers or technology in a battle. not because they were super intelligent. i would say the builder is smarter in that context because they saw how to improve and expand that and make it last. one thing i liked about Europe when i traveled there is everything is so old compared to the U.S. or Australia, like its been around a really long time, because of builders
even like with art and music. a lot of stuff is founded off experimentation and chance more than like purposeful. outside of like Brian Eno with ambient music and Picasso with Cubism. most people were trying to create something else, like rock music they were just trying to make faster blues, house music they were trying to make disco, the list goes on, it just happened to be different enough that it needed a different name for marketing. even scales and colors, someone was like if i hit this note and it makes this sound, lets build on that a name the sounds and structure the ones that go together in a key
bruh even a house, you dont have to be super smart to realize you need shelter from the weather, even animals can do that, thats instinct. everything structured has some sort of foundation but you dont need high intelligence for that like i said. you do need more intelligence to go from, huts >house> mansion >buildings>towers
improving things takes a lot of smarts at certain point. more so than founding so yeah, im a go with builders
The question is predicated on there being a scenario wherein one must choose one or the other.
Because life is built on co-operation, whereby nothing and no one is complete alone, such a scenario cannot occur within this existence, which means an answer is not supposed to be possible to find for those bound within this existence.
Basically, the question is a wild goose chase meant to trip up, not help. It's not a question - it's a trap
Because life is built on co-operation, whereby nothing and no one is complete alone, such a scenario cannot occur within this existence, which means an answer is not supposed to be possible to find for those bound within this existence.
Basically, the question is a wild goose chase meant to trip up, not help. It's not a question - it's a trap