Which of these anime structures do you like the most?

.....................................

  • A

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • B

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C

    Votes: 7 50.0%
  • D (Cuz I like the D)

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Total voters
    14

DoubleKamui

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
4,803
Reaction score
848
A: Long-running series with each episode covering a lot of canon material e.g. two to four chapters.

The pacing is great, and viewers can enjoy watching an episode that is practically filler-free. However, since there is a lot of canon material being animated into one episode, the gap between the anime and the manga is usually small. As a result, there needs to be filler arcs to prevent the anime from reaching the manga. Examples of series that follow(ed) this structure are Naruto, Bleach and early One Piece, where the pacing is excellent but there are a lot of filler arcs.

B: Long-running series with each episode covering less canon material e.g. no more than one chapter.

Here, the pacing is much slower because each episode covers lesser canon material. Thus, an episode created from this structure would usually contain a lot of filler scenes. Though, these fillers are generally more related to the canon material, as the small amount of canon material is dragged out into one, long episode. Additionally, there are lesser and/or shorter filler arcs, as the fillers are integrated within the canon material and there is usually no concern for the anime to reach the manga due to the slow pacing. One Piece is one series that currently has this structure, where the pacing is slow but there are lesser/shorter filler arcs.

C: Short-running series with each episode covering a lot of canon material.

Series that have this structure (such as Attack on Titan) generally have beautiful art and animation, on a very consistent scale. There are no filler episodes at all and each episode is entirely canon. It has all of the advantages of structures A and B. The only downside is that it takes a lot of time to create these high-quality episodes. Thus, there are usually long breaks between seasons and you may have to wait for two years just to watch the next episode.


Note: By long-running series, I meant series that have an episode released every week (except on special occasions such as Japanese holidays when there are breaks). Short-running series don't have this week-to-week schedule. They may release an episode each week, but they only do it for a specific period of time before having a long break.

Also note that there are variations to these structures. For example, Naruto episodes sometimes cover less than one chapter. So consider this thread in general terms.
 

NineSNS

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Messages
6,848
Reaction score
791
Probably C first then A. If I have to see filler, I prefer it in large doses XD
 

Torche

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
58,956
Reaction score
3,171
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But Claymore needs a reboot. :coffee:
 

Pumpkin Ninja

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
15,554
Reaction score
1,857
A. Usually I feel that short-running series are more rushed especially closer towards the end.

Also for B, they're more likely to screw up with what is canon and non-canon.
 
Last edited:

BenjerminGaye

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
19,423
Reaction score
823
C.
What's the point of waiting for filler to end if it's gonna be low quality Sub par episodes?
I rather it be done seasonal like the rest of the world does it.
 

DoubleKamui

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
4,803
Reaction score
848
C.
What's the point of waiting for filler to end if it's gonna be low quality Sub par episodes?
I rather it be done seasonal like the rest of the world does it.
You have a point. Though, some people prefer watching something (whether that be fillers or not) than nothing at all.
 

1Told

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
2,935
Reaction score
316
sorry the D tempted me too much Lol

the problem with fillers is most of the time the quality is shitty af, the story is boring, doesn't make sense, contradict the canon one and they can also ruin the characters (OOC, stupid non canon stuff etc).

i don't watch One Piece neither Bleach so idk if it's better or not with these 2 hmm
 

V h o

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
16,796
Reaction score
815
C and then A. I rather have short and sweet than long with a chance of sheet.
 

Zealous Sparks

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
12,960
Reaction score
1,481
Secret Option E: Your Previous Sig

I'd say that option C is the best. It would give you just enough of the plot without being drawn out for too long, and the quality of the animation would be better. I wait for other TV series to get released seasonally, so I would have no problems waiting longer for the episodes.
 

Airi

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
5,536
Reaction score
1,199
A & C.

The best long anime I've seen is Hunter x Hunter (2011), it's not really long, but compared to short anime (25~ episodes), it kinda is. It had no filler though, and the animation/art was great!
Naruto is a close second. :)

And the best short anime I've seen is Attack on Titan.
Death Note is a close second. :)
 
Top