- Joined
- Oct 23, 2011
- Messages
- 2,387
- Reaction score
- 234
Barcelona and Man UTD 




First off, that took me about 5 mins or less to write down, and when you are trying to get something out there it is better to elaborate than not.
25 mil? Messi? paying half? equaling to 50 mil? are you kidding me? FYI he's worth more than 100 mill and City even offered 150 mill 3 time Fabs price.
Lets assume if Messi desired to go play for Riverplate, if river plate payed 50 mil and Messi added in another 50 mil than of course he'd be free to go. If his desire isn't to play for Barca than why keep him? Will I like it? Will the Barca fans like it? No, but it's meant to happen it will.
Fab stated himself he would pay to move to Barca because not only Barca, but Arsenal were being stubborn...truth.
Favour? Well, than you should have considered it a favour when Barca give you the services of Fab. We only got back what we gave you. We sold him cheap and got him back cheap
Nasri wanted to leave and had no hope for the club as Fab did reason why his saga carried on for three years till he gave up. Nasri wants trophies and now he is warming the bench nicely for City.
Ronaldo did hand in request and it's not like he sat there to let Man U make a decision, but he wanted the move himself. As Escorp said it wasn't as big of a deal as Fabs, but it was Ronaldo's desire to play for Madrid as a kid and ppl like your are tagging Cesc as a villain because he wants to play for his club?
You get paid kumiYou don't need to be a writer or good at english as long as we understand what you are trying to say (everyone makes mistakes), but at least back up your info that is all we are asking, don't come up with one sentence saying, which at times are irrelevant to the topic. You opened a discussion and went on about it all we are doing is replying to it.
Before going forward here do inform me are you for or against Fab? One point your all defending him and the other next you don't good words for him.
First Silva (who you call second best) was signed for about 20 mill, and Cesc left for more than 25 mill (or at least Arsenal will get more later on). I've stated this above before, Cesc was offered 50+ mill by Madrid and around 40-45 mill by Milan and City, so why didn't Arsenal sell him there if they wanted the money so bad? Thats right he didn't want to go anywhere, but Barca, so thus he offered to pay if Barcelona and Arsenal couldn't come to an agreement. Cesc value has dropped a lot in 07 he made about 45 apps for Arsenal and after that he made 30 or less due to injury, which dropped his value, so Barca's price for him is justified IMO.
Barca has had already 25 games played and Fab has played only about 8-10 and was out for some due to injury.
Pep was handed down a good team? I agree, but so were the past coaches, but what have they done again with Barca? Pep is probably the most successful coach in Barca history and will always be remember by the world as in the past 3 years Barca have hit Europe with a storm.
Barca and Arsenal don't play the same way. They have there own styles and play.
The whole 'ps' joke maybe Arsenal should win something for their players to stay![]()
First thing 1 st somebody(Escorpiius) reminded me that this conversation that i am having with you does not suits this thread , so i will refrain from replying you here ,
i would request you pls open a new thread and inform me of it.U_U
I repeat - this threadYou must be registered for see linkswas made for ardent football fans for discussing over general football issues (like transfers issues, specualations, weekly league and CL results, gossips and overall debates over teams/players especially the big European teams) so that we don't need to make a thread for every single one. Perfect for your Fabregas discussion.
yaya Man U and Man City are out of the UFC
Chelsea rocks with Drogba and torres..
Everton arent on your pole
Dude never ever compare chelsea and Arsenal ever got it ...
u dont c me compare barca and real m do you .....
:flaw:
but its true before wenger come no one know arsenal and before mou come chelsea is nothing moe than a joke in EPL
I agree with you, but now the partnership is Drogba and Sturridge. (better combo. even tho Torres is more expensive.) Torres is more for better image of the team..
Torres is just Handsome.. xd
sturridge owns but he wants to score sometimes there is a player in loads of space to get the ball but sturridge takes a shot and keeper blocks itxd
just put Mata then we have a fight between Mata and Silva two guys who played in ValenciaHe is a bit selfish sometimes , but thats what you get form player who never gets into the starting line up .
Atleast he forces the keeper to make a save...