Well, those organisms weren't humans.
Humans to this day has the conventional male and female counterparts with respective body parts.
Humans originated from those organisms, and like I said before, humans have more than two sexes. Ever hear of a hermaphrodite? They are born with both male and female reproductive organs. So again, you are wrong about this notion of conventionalism.
But you are right on nothing was "intended". People explore thier sexuality in the scenario provided by thier surroundings.
They live in surroundings which support homosexuality, they have high chances of becoming one.
But, how is being "gay" any good to humanity?
They cannot make kids. They cannot really live in society without the hateful stares from strangers.
They cannot really invite straight men and women into thier homes lest they want a rude off-comment, which might, accidently sprout out of thier tongues.
Homosexuality in general really doesn't give a good vibe nor does it sound "realistic" in our society really.
It's just a trend like fashion, which keeps evolving day by day.
Wow, this is ignorant on another level. So you're saying that you can't be good to society without producing children?
So you can't be good to society by doing other good things? So are people who are born infertile also abominations? What about people who choose to not have kids? Are they all just a waste to humanity?
Aren't there saints in the bible who never had children? Didn't Jesus apparently not have children? Aren't there priests who claim celibacy and not have children? This is very hypocritical and the main argument people use to project their disdain on gays.
I've heard this so many times from people who in another day say that they believe the world is overpopulated. It's such hypocrisy.
If you believe that God has intended humans to create for the good of society, then why would he make people infertile or make them gay? Being gay isn't a choice, it's a sexual orientation just like being straight. If you can't find another man attractive as a straight person, then a gay person can't find another women sexually attractive.
The only difference between a gay person and a straight person is their sexual preference. You don't have a clue of what you're talking about and are stereotyping. Have you even met a gay person before? They're regular people, just with a different sexual preference....that's all.
Even in bible, when sodom and gommorah engaged in such acts, god punished them by sending sulphur and brimstone, well you can say this is false information, but still, it's a historical record of what happened that day in that ancient period, just like egyptian manuscripts portray the incidents of what happened in egpyt in ancient times.
Sodom and Gommorah isn't real. There is no concrete evidence of their existence. There were cities that were destroyed by natural events to which biblical archaeologists try to claim as Sodom and Gommorah, but there is no proof that they were those cities or that the accounts which are referencing ever happened.
If God punishes societies indulging in homosexual acts with fire and brimstone, then every human nation would be wiped out. And again, if God creates everything, then why does he create homosexuality in all creatures?
If you're referring to the Exodus in Egypt, again, there is absolutely no historical or archaeological evidence of this ever happening.
Your entire opinion is molded by a book of fairytales, and it makes you look like an ******* while trying to preach false-righteousness from an invisible man in the sky that likes to contradict himself.
