What is a mangafact.

[Kαmi]

There are manga facts and manga opinions. People get this mixed up so much it's not even funny.

 

[-Punk-]

Fact is something that can't be disproven... simple as that.

Manga fact = What the author has written in or about HIS/HER manga, nothing more nothing less.

People need to stop arguing against the author.

No! it plays with the story & it doesn't mean everything it's true .

 

[3MESSIAH]

Do you have anything to negate it? no...So it would be considered a fact, until proven wrong.


Madara only fighting for Hashirama's dna = Manga fact, UNTIL Madara himself said the fight was a deathmatch.

the fight was a deathmatch but its true purpose lied in getting hashirama`s DNA.
madara probably wanted to beat hashirama and then take his DNA but he figured he couldnt beat him so he took it and ran for it

 

[Shinobi2012]

Yeah well "fact" is a strong word. And a lot of narubasers like to sprinkle that word all over their posts so that they can glorify their own opinions.

I know what you mean.

But,that is just someone failing to understand something in conjunction with them being bias against a certain character or part of the plot.

It is the same line of thought people have when they claim a plot hole.

It always ends up with them failing to understand something that happened and/or they did not like something that transpired in the story combined with the fact that they have no idea what the definition of plot hole means.


Some times they also try to say artist mistakes are plot holes.

Anyway what anyone says does not change facts.

A fact is a fact and nobody can change that.

 

[Shinobi2012]

So nagato being a god is a mangafact since kishi wrote it

No.

Either you don't understand or your being sarcastic.

Nagato stated he was a god not kishi.
Kishi wrote it.

When someone speaks in the manga it is not kishi it is the person in the manga.

Kishi gave him a god theme.If he was god he obviously would not have to fight anyone and could just blink them out of existence.

You need to stop taking everything so literal.

 

[a banned cartoon]

Actually manga fact Is what you actually see in the manga because this is un disputable. However what you read in the manga may be the opinion off another character that's not necessarily true, but through the character stating an opinion that's not fact actually adds a persona to that character. Often times people tale what a character days quite literal, when that character may just be stating what try heard from somebody else, or their own opinions,

 

[-Sky-]

Characters can say all they want, but we can see who the strongest characters are and who would beat who.

Feats > Talk

To your point about Kakuzu, regardless of wether he said that or not, their could only be a few interpretations.

1.) Hashirama was either gimped or toying with him

2.) Kakuzu din't go all out against Naruto and co.

or 3.) Kakuzu is BS'ing

Honestly, there's no way in hell Kakuzu fights on par with Hashirama.

^ Feats > Talk. The same logic can be used in any scenario.

 

[-Punk-]

Actually manga fact Is what you actually see in the manga because this is un disputable. However what you read in the manga may be the opinion off another character that's not necessarily true, but through the character stating an opinion that's not fact actually adds a persona to that character. Often times people tale what a character days quite literal, when that character may just be stating what try heard from somebody else, or their own opinions,

Exactly , is it really that hard to understand ? or people are just hardcore Narutards who can't stop wanking .

 

[MuerteMiAmigo]

I consider feats manga facts.

It's hard to trust what a character says because Kishi has shown characters lie about things a lot.

this guy hit the nail on the head

 

[Shinobi2012]

Characters can say all they want, but we can see who the strongest characters are and who would beat who.

Feats > Talk

To your point about Kakuzu, regardless of wether he said that or not, their could only be a few interpretations.

1.) Hashirama was either gimped or toying with him

2.) Kakuzu din't go all out against Naruto and co.

or 3.) Kakuzu is BS'ing

Honestly, there's no way in hell Kakuzu fights on par with Hashirama.

^ Feats > Talk. The same logic can be used in any scenario.

Fighting on par does not mean he is his equal it means he fought on par with him.

We know who won and who is the superior ninja because he failed his mission to kill him.

 

[aimop95]

Here is a manga fact: Naruto exists.
We good? Ok.

 

[Byakusharinnegan]

Most of those things were said by the characters themselves. If Konohamaru said he was the God of shinobi and could solo Madara, would it be a manga fact?

 

[Shinobi2012]

Exactly , is it really that hard to understand ? or people are just hardcore Narutards who can't stop wanking .

They cant stop wanking.

 

[-Sky-]

Fighting on par does not mean he is his equal it means he fought on par with him.

We know who won and who is the superior ninja because he failed his mission to kill him.

"Fighting on par" was a hypothetical statement made by the thread poster.

Hashirama absolutely destroys Kakuzu. He most likely toyed with him, then let him run off.

 

[Crossroads]

Gaara > Itachi, manga fact.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Shinobi2012]

"Fighting on par" was a hypothetical statement made by the thread poster.

Hashirama absolutely destroys Kakuzu. He most likely toyed with him, then let him run off.

I was making a point.I never said or implied kakuzu could take him.

He is skilled enough to fight him and survive.

And toying around with people is not hashi's style.

It more or less went like kakuzu fought him saw they he would eventually lose out and ditched the mission.