Jackmanben4
Member
Hey guys spiderman4 was supposed to b relased last year is't it ...or amazing spiderman n spiderman4 r same movie... I confused
Depends on the size of the spider.Have you have ever caught a spider, broke its legs, put it on the ground, sprayed it for 20 seconds with hairspray then took a lighter and watched that bitch burn? No? Well the Green Goblin has....
What, Ultimate Spider-Man is going to be way better then the Maguire Movies. They had nothing to do with the original franchise.No "The Amazing Spiderman" is a complete restart of the series and they are replacing all the old actors![]()
Even though most fans were disappointed with Spider-Man 3, it was an enormous box office success, and Sony green-lit Spider-Man 4 not long after 3‘s release.
Raimi wanted the villain this time out to be the Lizard, while the studio wanted John Malkovich as Vulture. Tobey Maguire and Kirstin Dunst were set to reprise their roles as well, and development was in full swing when Raimi backed out, citing creative differences with the studio.
Afterwards, Marc Webb was brought in to restart the franchise anew, and he chose Andrew Garfield as his Spider-Man.
THEY DIDN'T GET RID OF ANYONE, Who would watch a REBOOT of the ORIGINAL Series with the OLD ACTORS from the Series that had nothing to do with the Comic? That's retarded, of course they would choose new actors or would you like to see Tobey Maguire to turn into Spider-Man again? + He's freaking old, he can't play the role of a High School Boy anymore. As much as I like him, I wouldn't.I'm gonna watch it but I hate how they got rid of all the old actors :\