What country do you live in?
- Thread starter Power Bottom
- Start date
HashiraMadara
Active member
this left paragraph killed your whole argument, 2 points of it make your statement void:
1. You labeled Muslim: which has nothing to do with ethnicity, it's purely a religion. There are pathans, Bengals, Caucasian people that are converting to Muslims. meaning your own race is affected by your down grading statement against Muslims.
2. You labeled over 1 000 completely different people as 1 (blacks). Black is nothing more than highly melanated skin. resulting from over exposure in sunny conditions, it's there to protect from skin cancer: why am I explaining this, that's because within black people you have genetically unrelated people. They're are so variant and different that they form different categories.
*Masai
*Bantu
*San
*Khoikhoi
*North Eastern
*Pygms etc, these are completely different races labeled by ignorant people like you black.
conclusion: Bantu are the most intelligent African race, Hailing IQ average > Chinese. in America right now Black people from Africa are ranking #1 in Universities
You must be registered for see links
in every university black Africans have the highest graduate rate because of the Bantu.
you almost fooled me into thinking you're intelligent, I was excited for nothing I guess :|
Last edited:
It's called context genius - when I talk about 'Muslim' I'm referring to the peoples of North Africa, Middle East and parts of South Asia. It's kind of like how Islamist groups don't add the ethnic qualifier every time they talk about the "crusaders," since it's clear they are referring to White Europeans by context.
The ayatollah of Iran once said of the brain-drain in Iran (see, Iranians who manage to make something of themselves tend to leave that Islamic utopia) something to the effect of 'good riddance.' I say the same for anyone who converts to Islam with the difference being that the convert was probably a brain-gain for the group that lost him (since they were likely to be from the left side of the bell-curve, get it?).
No I said 'population' which, in context again, refers to the mean of a Gaussian distribution. Certainly there are intelligent Blacks - in fact, some groups do well here in Britain too. But they tend to be elite-selected (the cream of the cream of the crop):
You must be registered for see links
"Swanknasty cited page 18 of this paper to claim that in 1979, first generation African immigrants had a mean of 12.2 years of education. Swanknasty felt this showed that they are not that highly selected since they are only a little more educated than high school graduates on average, but the African born immigrants surveyed in 1979 were roughly 36 years old and would have likely attended university around 1963. Figure 1 in this document, shows that in 1970, less than 1% of college age sub-Saharan Africans were enrolled in tertiary education. Further, in 1950 South Africa, only 0.5% of Africans even qualified for university. So being a bit more educated than a high school graduate in 1963 likely put African immigrants to Britain in the top 0.5% to top 1% of sub-Saharan Africans of their cohort. Normalizing the distribution, the African immigrants to Britain are 2.43 standard deviations (+2.43 SD) more educated than the average black African.
Assuming a 0.65 correlation between IQ and education (Jensen, 1998), we would expect their IQs to be 0.65(+2.43 SD) = +1.58 SD higher than the average black African. Assuming the sub-Saharan distribution has a mean of 67 and an SD of 15, that puts them at 91 (24 points above the African mean). This is probably a conservative estimate; those who migrate to Britain are not only way more educated than the average African, but were resourceful enough to escape a poor country and adapt to an unimaginably prosperous one. In addition, many of them, despite being born in Africa, probably achieved their education in the developed world, suggesting they met even higher standards than university students educated in sub-Saharan Africa."
The distribution of Blacks in general, on the other hand, is another matter. If you have read the literature on this topic you would have been aware that social justice warriors have been calling IQ psychologists "racist" for decades for reporting the fact that an average IQ difference persists between Blacks and Whites.
No one, not even the environmentalist side of the debate like Stephen Jay Gould (whose work "The Mismeasure of Man" is a standard in those circles) defending the idea that the difference is purely environmental in origin, denies that this difference exists. The only thing that is debated is the origin of the difference in how much it is attributable to genes vs. environment.
In 2013 there was an anonymous survey done on this issue that asked 1237 IQ researchers the question "Asked: What are the sources of U.S. black-white differences in IQ?"
You must be registered for see links
Here were the results:
0% of differences due to genes: (17% of our experts)
0-40% of differences due to genes: 42% of our experts
50% of differences due to genes: 18% of our experts
60-100% of differences due to genes: 39% of our experts
100% of differences due to genes: (5% of our experts)
M=47% of differences due to genes (SD=31%)
And I'll tell you a secret, boy, this issue is being studied with genomics as we speak, and it isn't looking too good for you. Recently people have started looking at GWAS hits for 'educational attainment,' a proxy for intelligence, and comparing the frequency of those gene hits in different populations. This is only the beginning of the endeavor but here is the predictable picture that is emerging:
You must be registered for see links
"The genetic variants identified by two large GWAS of educational attainment were used to test a polygenic selection model.
Average frequencies of alleles with positive (Beta) effect on the phenotype (polygenic scores) were compared across populations and racial groups using data from 1000 Genomes and ALFRED. Strong correlations between polygenic scores and population IQ were found (r>0.8). Moreover, the polygenic score obtained from the two independent GWAS exhibited a strong correlation (r= 0.83), even after pruning for linkage disequilibrium.
Factor analysis revealed that most alleles loaded on a single factor, which in turn was strongly correlated to population IQ.
Polygenic and factor scores survived control for phylogenetic autocorrelation, although the latter’s net effect on population was stronger (Betas= 0.361 and 0.861, respectively).
Results obtained from ALFRED data were similar and revealed a peak in polygenic and factor scores among East Asians (60.8% and 1.06, respectively) and a nadir among Africans and Native Americans (44.1% and 0.493)."
Last edited:
wanderingcactus
Active member
"free" country.
Heard there's lots of asians there and soon youll be a chinese state. Good luck mate
Kishi Uzumaki
Active member
Awards
HashiraMadara
Active member
(I using a mobile phone excuse spelling mistakes)
*1 just finished with the articles, one thing I'll conclude on: I repeat, the results are claimed of belonging to subsaharan, which destroys what you call fixed variable to validate the stated hypothesis.
They first build positive Pathos by complementing the IQ of the subjects being average 90, using the platonic marketing skills, then they destroy that by spamming numbers trying to link what you call frican in a rigid singularity group on which the rest of the findings are based upon, :|
2. as a Mathematicis major I'll tell you the value of variation: <== The lower strata and the elite intelligent are both African: This means the tallest race in the world is African(Sudanese Masai), The shortest race in the world is again African(Pygms), The least intelligent race is once again Africans, The most intelligent is too African. million dollar question why? BECAUSE AFRICA IS DUBBED MELTING GENE POT: too many gene variation to have a sensible conclusion on.
3. The researchers doing those articles were a bit too naive: on over a million different tribes they managed a thorough conclusion on a mind bogglingly limited sample:|
on my opinion though: I hope people like you and me die in the world, we are not doing the world any favours with these racist arguments
Last edited:
HashiraMadara
Active member
definitely not me, he just forced me to play with his own rules. I was taught you encounter a swordsman you become one to match him...
Last edited:
HashiraMadara
Active member
when are you finding someone to replace Mahela Jawardene and Kumar Sangakarra XD! What happened to Ajantha Mendis XD
Last edited:
Yeah, because I don't believe IQ is an absolute method to calculate the intelligence of someone, as it only focuses on logical-mathematical intelligence when we know there are countless others..
HashiraMadara
Active member
unless we're living in space age at the moment intelligence is not everything. cause a super racist can easily be swept off his high horse by love from a racially different girl
Last edited:
HashiraMadara
Active member
Kishi Uzumaki
Active member
Awards
Just can't replace them, they're talents comes once a decade rarely the same time gonna need to rely on other talents for now .
and people got used to him
sasukesworld
Active member
XD
I wasn't offended. You can't offend.
Well, there are several reasons to do so. Just because you don't inform yourself doesn't mean there isn't enough informations out there to see why I "blame" them.
The coin always has two sides.
What are you talking about. This makes zero sense, not that I expected much but come on.
Yes, great again.
We aren't, and with more and more uneducated "refugees" the problems won't be solved. They will get worse.
Europeans have to wake up and unite against a common foe. =D
HashiraMadara
Active member
Narushima guy hits with references and logical statements, you're not even worth a counter argument
Last edited:
Obito the supreme jin
Active member
We'll see but I don't believe in the idiots that say that they will escape the country. They are bluffing for sure.
So speaking about America's history/past equates to your age. What kind of logic is that?
JENchuuriki
Active member
Awards
nope haha it's not gonna happen. Although you're right that there are many 'asians' migrant here as well as other nationalities who reside. But I think lots of countries too? I say it's free, esp in terms of policy... you can get away with anything. And that can be bad thing too, if not controlled. Actually, it has been happening now
