ZoroXTashigi
Member
This is the best...
CoC Vs CoC ... small version of ....
You must be registered for see links
CoC Vs CoC ... small version of ....
You must be registered for see links
Once again, no, he didn't withstand them because to withstand means to be undamaged and unaffected by. His body was clearly damaged, and he was affected by the bullets, as he collapsed and couldn't move.Withstand wear and pressure, that was what I'm capitalizing on.
He was able to withstand Vergo's Haki beatings without breaking a bone in his body.
His persistence in defying doflamingo pirates was unaffected and unyielding.
The synonym from this vocabulary:
with·stand
wiTHˈstand,wiT͟Hˈstand/
verb
remain undamaged or unaffected by; resist.
"the structure had been designed to withstand winds of more than 100 mph"
synonyms:resist, weather, survive, endure, cope with, stand, tolerate, bear, stomach, defy, brave, hold out against, tough out, bear up against; More
See the bold words up there^^
Try and follow that would ya, the vocabulary I used was a summarization for both of the definition.
*He tolerated the pain from the bullet holes*
Like I posted before, do you enjoy being a c*nt?
you can understand it both ways, you can say his body withstood the damage as in it wasn't damaged (which wouldn't be true), or you can understand it as in (his body withstood the damage and) it kept its primary function, which is to keep you alive-Once again, no, he didn't withstand them because to withstand means to be undamaged and unaffected by. His body was clearly damaged, and he was affected by the bullets, as he collapsed and couldn't move.
The better question is do you just enjoy being wrong all of the time.
Once again you don't understand what is being unaffected and undamaged.Once again, no, he didn't withstand them because to withstand means to be undamaged and unaffected by. His body was clearly damaged, and he was affected by the bullets, as he collapsed and couldn't move.
Lol you think you're right?The better question is do you just enjoy being wrong all of the time.
Thank youyou can understand it both ways, you can say his body withstood the damage as in it wasn't damaged (which wouldn't be true), or you can understand it as in (his body withstood the damage and) it kept its primary function, which is to keep you alive-
durable/durability does not mean it will receive no damage, it means it can last/exist for a long time and through extensive wear without significant deterioration, as in it will retain it's functionality, if you have a durable car it doesn't mean it will be pitch perfect in 15 years, it just means it will still be working, same for ''withstand'', if a car withstood 15 years of use it would NOT be pitch perfect.
first of all, your welcomeThank you
Longevity is part of its definition too, him looking up the word "withstand," is just his way proving that he is a stubborn little brat.
what's up with this pointless dumb argument on my thread
You must be registered for see images
Again, no, that's not what withstood meant. To be unaffected by something means the state you were in after you interacted with it is the same as the state you were in before you interacted with it. In this case, the bullets is what Corazon interacted with. The state Corazon was in before he interacted with the bullets was not the same as the state he was in after he interacted with the bullets, meaning the bullets affected. If to withstand means to be unaffected by, according the definition Varia is choosing to use in his argument, then Corazon did not withstand them as he was affected by the bullets. If to withstand if part of durability, and Corazon didn't withstand them, then it's not a feat of durability. Plain and simple.you can understand it both ways, you can say his body withstood the damage as in it wasn't damaged (which wouldn't be true), or you can understand it as in (his body withstood the damage and) it kept its primary function, which is to keep you alive-
durable/durability does not mean it will receive no damage, it means it can last/exist for a long time and through extensive wear without significant deterioration, as in it will retain it's functionality, if you have a durable car it doesn't mean it will be pitch perfect in 15 years, it just means it will still be working, same for ''withstand'', if a car withstood 15 years of use it would NOT be pitch perfect.
To withstand means to be unaffected and undamaged by, according to the same source you are using for your argument(You using the source means you cannot try to discredit the source just because it's being used against you, or you'll discredit your argument as well). Corazon was damaged by the bullets, and by extension, affected by them. Meaning, according to your own sources, he did not withstand them; as withstanding ties into durability, that means this isn't a durability feat.Once again you don't understand what is being unaffected and undamaged.
Read my post again instead of lashing with your emotion.
Lol you think you're right?
How can I be wrong about my own opinion?
This is always like you, you think you are right about everything.
You are too arrogant and stupid to see that you are WRONG.
1. Pissed on you about Doflamingo's ability being revealed
2. Pissed on you who holds the highest position in Doffy's crew
3. Complete and utter shat you on you for that stupid naruto comment you made.
^^Wrongs don't come right three times in three separate threads.
You are not right period.
You call me stubborn, but respond to me just as much as I respond to you.Thank you
Longevity is part of its definition too, him looking up the word "withstand," is just his way proving that he is a stubborn little brat.
well you can use it anyway you want, the rest of the engish speaking world will be perfectly fine with using ''a car withstood a 7k mile trip'' or ''the castle withstood the assault'' just like we did up until nowAgain, no, that's not what withstood meant. To be unaffected by something means the state you were in after you interacted with it is the same as the state you were in before you interacted with it. In this case, the bullets is what Corazon interacted with. The state Corazon was in before he interacted with the bullets was not the same as the state he was in after he interacted with the bullets, meaning the bullets affected. If to withstand means to be unaffected by, according the definition Varia is choosing to use in his argument, then Corazon did not withstand them as he was affected by the bullets. If to withstand if part of durability, and Corazon didn't withstand them, then it's not a feat of durability. Plain and simple.
To your car analogy, a car that is still functioning after 15 years did not withstand 15 years because, according to the source Varia is using to base his argument, to withstand means to be unaffected by. A car that has ran for 15 years would be affected by that passage of time, so it did not withstand it. The analogy does not work. The bolded doesn't apply to the argument Varia and I are having due to the fact that is a different source of information that Varia is using. Varia asserted that durability is to withstand from a source, and his source says that to withstand means undamaged and unaffected. At this point, I'm arguing that Varia's argument is wrong.