Violence-How effective is it?
- Thread starter lswhyte123
- Start date
Infinite Mizu
Active member
I'd love to get violent to solve a problem.
I'D REALLY LOVE IT!!! :rag:
But I know that doing so would cause even more problems and with my short temper and inner psycho; serious injuries.
As for your question. Violence is very effective but very risky.
As for your question. Violence is very effective but very risky.
lswhyte123
Active member
no. all it does is provoke the one being hit. All it vents out is anger from the one hitting. All it does is continue the cycle of hatred.
narutoverse does not equal real world...Very Good Answer!! +rep
I agree with you. It is an effective way of solving many problems, not all, but it does have serious repurcusions.
I realise that. But you can't deny that it's true to an extent. No matter how, revenge is a real delicacy for anyone. U_U
Very Good Answer!! +rep
I agree with you. It is an effective way of solving many problems, not all, but it does have serious repurcusions.
lswhyte123
Active member
It's effective as long as it doesn't get too serious. Some people need a smack to the face, or a punch, or just a good beating in order to come to their senses. Anymore than that, and its bad.
Sterling Malory Archer
Active member
Awards
lol you can't generalize something like this. People's views of violence differs from the next. To answer your thread, it depends on the situation...
Give me a situation lol
Give me a situation lol
-Lionheart-
Banned
uzumaki antonia
Active member
Darthlawsuit
Active member
Like all things.... It depends on the situation. Sometimes the peaceful way just doesn't work so you have to resort to violence.
You should always attempt a peaceful way but if that should fail with no chance of recovery then violence is the only thing left. Despite what everyone says at the end of the day might = right. If the NAZI won WWII history would have said they were right and the people of the day would believe it, at least those not oppressed.
If the violence makes sense and has a purpose people agree with more people will join its cause. Look at the American revolution. A bunch of peasant farmers fighting the world's superpower at the time with almost no hope of victory yet people joined it in droves. In the end it was written as the "correct" and "just" thing to do for our freedom.
You should always attempt a peaceful way but if that should fail with no chance of recovery then violence is the only thing left. Despite what everyone says at the end of the day might = right. If the NAZI won WWII history would have said they were right and the people of the day would believe it, at least those not oppressed.
If the violence makes sense and has a purpose people agree with more people will join its cause. Look at the American revolution. A bunch of peasant farmers fighting the world's superpower at the time with almost no hope of victory yet people joined it in droves. In the end it was written as the "correct" and "just" thing to do for our freedom.
mcchikeneater
Active member
This.
Violence sometimes is the answer, if used properly in proper amounts. If you get told not to do something but nothing ever happens but getting told, you will probably keep doing it. If you get told not to do something, and get your ass kicked when you don't listen, you will probably stop.
And dictators that kill their own people, you think that you can just ask them to stop and they will? Or, do you think bombing runs over the capitol city are more effective?
Violence is part of us, and always will be. We will never get rid of it, but we do need to learn to control it better.
NarutoKage2
Active member
There are'nt just those 2 options you gave in the poll.
It all depends on the situation and context.
It all depends on the situation and context.
Darthlawsuit
Active member
^ This. Violence is terrible when unrestrained but can be useful if used properly. Like all things in this world moderation is key.
