- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 5,122
- Reaction score
- 552
Of course, i completely understand that you believe that way!! And I support you!
But we are in debate here, and you provided your opinion to support your point (in your earlier posts), and that is not valid to me.
This is not about me liking or disliking events of the manga, it's about managing true and canonical information when you are debating with someone, and I wanted to know if that was actually canon because i ignored that completely.
This was our conversation:
I never tried to offend you, I think we are having a misunderstanding here...And now you replyed...
*sigh* You still don't seem to get it.
Me:Well I'm sure enough that he was in below 17-18 years of age when it happened because in part 1 he was listed to be that age.
You:That doesn't make your opinion a fact, sorry, has nothing to do with it.
Again I'm just saying that he wasn't 17 or 18 I don't get where you believe thats me trying to use that as a conclusion as to why I believed I was right.
I'm not having a misunderstanding.. it is you since you have been making repeated mistakes of saying things that I didn't say.
Oh and thanks for trying to tell me what a debate is.. gee I never ever knew about it!! (obvious sarcasm)
Like I said I was tired of looking up the info when you could've easily found it yourself.. there's more evidence plus with what Waltz said to support that Itachi was 11-13 maybe 14 when he defeated Orochimaru. Like I said don't believe it? Thats fine with me.
edit: anyways stop replying if you don't get what I'm trying to say I tire myself repeating things
Last edited: