Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
1. That doesn't say Zoro's Haki is superior, but that that move has an area of effect that is greater than Luffy's. For all we know, Luffy's Haki is capable of accomplishing the same thing. I'm also hesitant to count cutting the golem as a Haki feat for Zoro due to the fact that he was being thrown at the speed of sound at the time, which create a large amount of momentum which means more force.
2. And the concept that a DF power cannot be improved on is completely baseless. Nowhere in the manga does it state that a DF's strength is static. The fact that Luffy trained his DF implies that your DF can indeed grow stronger.
3/4. Law's Mes worked on Smoker because Mes is a move that has physical contact, specifically with the palm of his hand. Law can use Haki in conjunction with Mes because he can use Mes and Haki simultaneously on the same hand. Law didn't imbue Haki into Mes, he laced his hand with Haki and then performed Mes with that same hand, allowing him to touch Smoker which allowed Mes to take effect.
His cutting power and Shambles are different. When Law Shambles something or cuts it with his DF's cutting ability from a distance, there isn't any physical contact, there's no physical medium where Law imbues Haki into and then has touch the opponent while activating the fruit's power. There's no way to do that with Shambles, and the only way to use Haki simultaneously with his cutting ability like he did with Mes would be to do the cut by touching the opponent with his sword while in close quarter combat while the sword is laced in Haki and while releasing the Devil Fruit's power at the same time. A long-distance cut and Shambles can't be imbued, combined, or enhanced with Haki.
The only way used Haki when he cut Vergo was if Law coated his sword with invisible Haki and when Vergo was in close quarters, the blade of the sword touched Vergo while releasing Law's fruit power while simultaneously being laced with Haki. The invisible Haki bypassed his Full Body Koka while the blade simultaneously released a cut, cutting Vergo. This means what Zoro needed Koka to do, Law could do with his invisible Haki. This would put Law's Haki above Zoro's, as Vergo was portrayed to be stronger than Pica.
If Law didn't use Haki, that means that Law's powers are capable of affecting Haki without Haki aiding them. Either way, that means Law should be capable of affecting Zoro.
Now for the bolded part. Do you even understand how debating works? I mean, if you're no longer interested in the debate and you wanna drop it, then drop it, but don't try to insult my intelligence with a statement that makes no sense for more than one reason. First, you're coming at me because I'm replying to you with rebuttals in a debate. We know that you think you're right, but that doesn't mean you are. If I have a way to rebuttal, then I will. That's how debates work, it's not the other person sucking your ass on how right you are, it's them arguing back.
Secondly, you're doing the same thing. You can't exactly take an ad hominem jab for someone responding in a debate with rebuttals when you are also rebuttalling. Surely, I don't have to explain why that doesn't exactly pan out well for you.
Thirdly, the fact that you're even using ad hominem and with such arrogance. What I say is nonsense simply because it's against what you want to be correct? Here's a word of advice you should take in mind the next time you get into a debate with anyone: If you need to insult or otherwise put them down, aka ad hominem, in order to get your point across or while getting your point across, especially if you're doing it as a "I'm right and you're stupidly wrong" like this, then you've lost the debate.
I doubt Luffy has a one-hit attack that can kill you, but okay.
