Please explain to me how the Izuna theory has the most amount of evidence against it.
Lol it doesn't...
I know I repeat this phrase alot but it still stands, none of Izuna's theory can be backed up because we have no proof that he was ever revived[not proven yet], his burial was show & everything so we know for sure he died[proven], never showed him being revived either so in my eyes he's worm food at the moment.
There's a difference between PLAUSIBLE and PROVEN. Plausible being that it IS possible with all the different revival techs out there. Your theories are based on facts, but these facts have nothing to do with your theory, and are contradicted by others as I will point out.
I support the Danzou & Obitio theory, for 1 because Danzou was alive & well during the 1st tobi attack[proven]
He probably was, but we haven't sen anything yet. Here we go.
he played a major part in the incidents that occured while Tobi was in Konohagakure[proven]
Yes, but this doesn't remotely mean he IS Tobi.
he posessed some the abilities displayed by Tobi during that time as well[proven]
Huh? When did he start using S/T techs during this time when we've only ever seen him fighting Sasuke? Here we go again.
& 2 because Obito was never actually shown dead[proven], he was left to die by his peers.
He was crushed by a rock. He's dead. It isn't plausible that he survived and furthermore, became an antagonist with no real motive.
He gave 1 of his eye's to Kakashi[proven]. Kakashi uses a doujutsu known as Kamui thanx to the sharingan given to him by Obito[proven]
This is true, but keep in mind Obito's other side was crushed. How can he use a crushed eye? It might be possible that Tobi harvested his eye, or that Tobi can use a similar technique to Kamui without being Obito. Uchiha powers tend to be related since...Uchihas are related.
The current Tobi uses a jutsu that is VERY much similar to, if not is Kamui[proven]. Which tells me that the sharingan in the current Tobi's eye socket did indeed belong to Obito[proven]
As mentioned above, SIMILAR doesn't mean PROVEN. And with all the contradicting evidence of Obito and his eye being crushed, I don't think so.
Also, NONE of the evidence you've given supports Obito being more than one person here.
Being the only 1 that supports my theory is actually a good thing to me, it makes an even bigger impression once it's revealed that i was correct about my theories. Not being apart of a major theory group isn't all that bad, there's no uniqueness in it so you can carry on with the Izuna crew. i have no problem being a loner with my Obito\Danzou theory....
Actually, it isn't. Now I see that all you care about is impressions which leads me to believe that your proud of how your theory developed from your own state of mind. The reason these theories are popular is because MORE THAN ONE person can see that they are plausible. Which leads them TO BEING MORE LIKELY. One person with one lone theory on his own doesn't really compare odds-wise.
If Hashirama's DNA is not involved with Izuna then how is white Zetsu's cells involved with him.white Zetsu is made of mokuton[proven]. Who other than Hashirama possessed mokuton? Yamato? Danzou?
I never said Hashirama's cells have nothing to do with Izuna. In fact, since I believe Tobi is Izuna, and Tobi has Zetsu in him or something of the sort, then the cells play a major role.
As for proof for Izuna, feel free to read posts already given, I gotta rush to work right now but I'll post more when I'm back.