Re: Tobi a Namikaze??
So basically you're saying that the FACT that me saying Kishimoto is bringing Shinto and Japanes folklore to Naruto, based off the various names of jutsus, that could be found off of any WIKI sites like the one I posted, vs Kishimoto actually drawing them into existence in his manga are two different things???
Did I say that? No, I didn't. I said nothing of the sort. Now you're twisting my words to make them mean what you want them to mean.
Who's to say the information is false just because it hasn't reached your ears of what you believe?? That's just like all the many other pointless thread that people pull up about who Madara is....Facts are facts right, YOU CAN'T BE ALIVE AND HAVE AN EDO.....RIGHT??? That's a fact that's in the Manga....right? Then tell that to those idiots who believe so.
Yes, it is false because nothing of the sort has even remotely been suggested in the manga. So yes, that's what it means. I don't even get what you're getting at. You're trying to justify that the facts on that wiki site are "not false"? That doesn't make a shred of sense.
The point here is you're basing a theory off completely wack information. That is not a theory. A theory
contains known facts and it builds upon them in an attempt to
explain an unknown. That's what a theory is by definition.
No one knew what the hell Izanagi was until Danzo spoke of it....which anyone who's familiar with Shinto and Japanese folklore would be....and there were HELLA sites that said the EXACT same thing.
Could you be any more incoherent in your argument? I don't see what Izanagi's debut even has to do with this.
Until Kishi reveals something in the manga it is not a fact. Ya, you can go speculate anything you want and justify all of it on the grounds that "just because it's not in the manga doesn't mean it's false". That's not even an argument. That's denial that you're wrong.
I bet you're not even listening to yourself. Anyone can blab on about anything they want and defend themselves by saying "just because it's not in the manga yet doesn't mean it's false". That's a completely void defense. It has no compelling argument behind it whatsoever.
So for you to sit continuosly flame me for a theory based on another website just because you don't know where they got their info from....hell I don't know where they got their info from....but I'm just going by what makes sense....how can someone warp continuously from one spot to another, become intangible whenever for extended periods of time....only a S-T user....one that has mastery of it. Does Madara has Mastery of Space-Time, no, otherwise the Hokages would've been dead by now....hell they would've been dead in the first 2 minutes......
You fail to see my point. What's posted on that site isn't even info. Do you not know what wiki sites are? I can go right now and edit whatever I want on that page. I can make up whatever I want and post it right now. That's what wiki websites are...
So your claim that Tobi is a Namikaze is solely on the fact that he has Space-Time techniques. Then by your logic I assume Tobirama was also a Space-Time user, correct? Even Kakashi has a Space-Time technique granted to him by his Sharingan. I assume that by your logic Kakashi is part Namikaze.
Even the basic Summoning Technique is a rudimentary form of Space-Time techniques. How do you explain the fact that almost anyone can do it?
There is absolutely nothing that links Space-Time techniques to the Namikaze name.
so you can believe what you want from whatever source you want the manga contradicts itself in plenty of ways....but anyone with a sliver of common sense knew that.....right....:scorps:
What does the manga contradicting itself have anything to do with our argument? What does it have to do with the fact that wiki sites are a bogus and unreliable source of info?