Timeline EXPLANATION

[Koha]

Well they HAD to graduate at the same time to be placed in the same team.
It's simple math really.

Kakashi graduated at 5
Obito graduated at 9

4 year difference?
unless Kakashi sat around for four years waiting for Obito to graduate.

No, Kakashi was 5 when he graduated and became a Chunin in one year, so he was being sent on assignments already. And then put on a SET ninja squad... There is only a difference of seven months in their age. Kakashi was a GENIUS who excelled quickly, Guy became a Genin at 7, before Obito graduated too. And Guy's older than both Obito and Kakashi..... To put it simply, they all graduated at different rates, Guy proved to be an excellent ninja as well as Kakashi being the once in a generation Shinobi, and Obito graduated and became a Genin at 9... A below average, underachiever fodder ninja. Kakashi, Guy, AND Obito are all 30.

 

[Koha]

This doesn't make sense the massacre happened when Naruto was born... since Sasuke is like 3 months older than Naruto.

Or am I missing something ?

The Uchiha massacre happened when Sasuke was 7 years old. Itachi was 13 when he killed his clan....

 

[kevenc]

The Uchiha massacre happened when Sasuke was 7 years old. Itachi was 13 when he killed his clan....

So he is mistaken, he said that the massacre happened 5 years before Naruto starts.

 

[Koha]

So he is mistaken, he said that the massacre happened 5 years before Naruto starts.

Yes, you're right.

 

[Cosmic Path]

Excellent + Rep

 

[Gouryuuka]

Explain this one. Why was Minato's face on the mountain when he wasn't Hokage yet? Remember he became Hokage AFTER the 3rd Ninja war. This was after Obito died. But we see here in this recent chapter that Minato's face is on the mountain BEFORE you self explained time skip before Obito died. That is a huge plot hole right there.

There are such things as illustrative mistakes in the manga, you know that right? Remember in the chapter where the Kages were all standing in the final panel after they showed up to face Madara? The Raikage's arms were both drawn normally even though he never got his missing arm replaced. It was fixed next chapter.

So that could have easily have been a mistake made by the illustrators of the Manga.

 

[immortal sage]

good timeline but idont think the mizukage part was right

 

[kevenc]

Guys that cant be right he said that the uchiha massacre happened 5 years before naruto starts, but no it happened when naruto had 7 years.

Yes i typed in cap so you can see and i want answer.

 

[kyubbi sagemode]

Amazing thread

 

[Naruto9001]

Why is everyone repping this? The op left out some stuff like what's your answer for Obito meeting Madara? What's your answer about him having so much knowledge about the Sage?

 

[Koha]

Guys that cant be right he said that the uchiha massacre happened 5 years before naruto starts, but no it happened when naruto had 7 years.

Yes i typed in cap so you can see and i want answer.

Yeah, he messed up which messed up every other one of his points.

 

[Hatake Ayano]

I must say i haven't read a lot of what's here but this what i have:
First, the masked man who attacked Minato cant be Obito (unless using some time space jutsu or something). Someone else is involved and still behind the scene.
The other thing is that when Kisami (i think when he killed the previous master of Samehada) he met the Mizukage and immediately the masked man came out and, after removing his mark, he recognized him as Madara, knowing that Kisame and Obito almost the same age. So, i dont think he will mistake the young man with the old man even with that face i think.
Well, i believe another character (probably the master mind) will come out soon.

 

[FizzyDrink]

I honestly cannot understand why so many people are enamored by this thread. It's not special at all really. All it is is a timeline that is over-complicated and consisting of some incorrect facts and an assumption, and then a closing statement that has nothing to do with the timeline and could have stood alone. Not to mention the closing statement doesn't prove or disprove anything either. It is basically just an assumption that the thread creator makes that is based on no definitive information, it's just an educated guess. Honestly, this thread is nothing special, and is not worthy of so much praise.

 

[ShaneEyyy]

This was really good +rep, but what would happen if when the next chapter comes out it turns out to be someone else like Izuna or something haha kidding, if you're right then give urself a good pat on the elbow

 

[Hatake Ayano]

Something else:
yes Minato became Hokage after Obito's death. Check episode 119, when they sent to their last mission Minato was a Jounin. So Kishi-san did a lot of mistakes i think.
Oh, and for hair style Sasuke's hair style changed a little during shippuuden. And Gaara's hair grew up after seeing him since he died. At least that what i read in the naruto wiki

 

[WhistleBlower]

thanks for making things clear, + reps

 

[shogun973]

Ok but if nagato and konan thought tobi was madara why would they try to bring him back to life if he alive to them

 

[Hatake Ayano]

Sorry but I remembered something:
page 3 from chapter 599, team Anko vs team Ibiki (this is the first time they conduct the exam all of them and "all" of them are at the age 6):
-Anko current age 28
-Ibiki current age 31
-Gekko Hayate "the sick examiner of Naruto's Chuunen exam" died at the age of 23 (by Baki).
"I read this from naruto wiki also."
So, their is a big gap. Anko and Gekko Hayate are younger than the other's by almost 3 years and 4 years respectively, if we can consider these info are being accurate as taken from data book. So this is another huge mistake. Did Anko an Hayate took the exam at the age 3 and 2 years respectively? I dont think so.

 

[Trevor]

Kakashi looks way older than 6 when he is promoted to chunin

 

[ChidoriChimp]

I knew that man. But thanks anyways.