then what would you use?of course , though....i wouldnt use the term "faster"....
then what would you use?of course , though....i wouldnt use the term "faster"....
Any specific reason why?I want time.
Now let's say you were a time user vs a speed user and you stopped time. This means that you only slowed the speed user down to normal speeds and so you two would still have to do battle on equal footing. But I would prefer time as well.Time is insanely better imo.
Edit
Only way I could see speed better is if something operated outside of time (if that's even possible) or some odd way could ignore time.
What you said is true, but add more speed and you'll shatter the time itself. Going faster than light reverses time, but going many times faster than light breaks the continuum. I think it's been explained in theory, but I can't search it up right now. Enjoy the scan from SA Superman, or search it up yourself. It's all very theoretical obviously, because we can't even reach light speed right now, let alone thousands of time faster than lightspeed.Really? I was more under the impression that time slows down for any object as it moves faster. At the speed of light, time
essentially stops for a human being traveling at that speed. Any faster though begins to cause the person to move backwards
in time to create a balance between space and time where a user is always moving at a certain rate through space-time.
Moving too fast through space though causes one to move backwards in time as a counterbalance.
Thus, time isn't 'shattered' per say.
And to the OP, this depends heavily on how fast we are talking, and the limitations and constraints of the time control.
Can I freeze time? Does it tire me out? How long can I hold it? Can I move backwards in time? Or can I just slow down
time and fast forward time to a small degree?
Is my super speed light-speed? 500 mph? 50 mph?
I need more concrete numbers to make a decision.