Thoughts on MW3

mcchikeneater

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,875
Reaction score
326
What do people think of MW3. i am very disappointed with it myself. They added "lag compensation" which punishes people for having good internet to make it fair for people with crappy internet, but all it really does is make you die 10 feet around corners to magic curving bullets or just always lose to people who are lagging in a firefight. the hit detection in it is even worse than black ops was, the light machine guns are wayyyyyy underpowered, even though the stats on them say they are good they do almost 0 damage. the m60 takes more bullets to kill people at long range than most submachine guns. that and to satisfy the crybabies who whined about noob tubing they made all explosives almost harmless. even in hardcore mode you can get several hit markers in a row with a noob tube and they wont die. black ops was way smarter with having noob tubes work well, but having flak jacket as a solution for people who got mad about them. in MW3 the blast shield perk does almost absolute 0 and you have to give up assassin or quickdraw whichever you use to be able to equip it.

the other day i decided to go back to black ops and between zombies and online multiplayer, there were actually more people playing black ops than were playing MW3. and at gamestop there were like 75 used copies of MW3 available and all but like 3 of the used copies of black ops had been recently bought. I know a lot of people who returned MW3 or traded it in for something else. Its funny the critic reviews of the game gave it a 9.5 and the user reviews it got a 2 in gameinformer.
 
Last edited:

Killer B

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
1,786
Reaction score
94
What do people think of MW3. i am very disappointed with it myself. They added "lag compensation" which punishes people for having good internet to make it fair for people with crappy internet, but all it really does is make you die 10 feet around corners to magic curving bullets or just always lose to people who are lagging in a firefight. the hit detection in it is even worse than black ops was, the light machine guns are wayyyyyy underpowered, even though the stats on them say they are good they do almost 0 damage. the m60 takes more bullets to kill people at long range than most submachine guns. that and to satisfy the crybabies who whined about noob tubing they made all explosives almost harmless. even in hardcore mode you can get several hit markers in a row with a noob tube and they wont die. black ops was way smarter with having noob tubes work well, but having flak jacket as a solution for people who got mad about them. in MW3 the blast shield perk does almost absolute 0 and you have to give up assassin or quickdraw whichever you use to be able to equip it.

the other day i decided to go back to black ops and between zombies and online multiplayer, there were actually more people playing black ops than were playing MW3. and at gamestop there were like 75 used copies of MW3 available and all but like 3 of the used copies of black ops had been recently bought. I know a lot of people who returned MW3 or traded it in for something else. Its funny the critic reviews of the game gave it a 9.5 and the user reviews it got a 2 in gameinformer.

I agree with you 100%......you forgot about the HORRIBLE SPAWNING.....I mean its just god awful

the maps are also pretty crappy....except for like 2 or 3
 

dwigg

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
655
Reaction score
51
BF3 Was the ish but MW3 kills in graphics

edit: Xbox360 by the way
 

Genjin

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
2,529
Reaction score
320
Got to 8th prestige.
Stopped playing.
I'm tired making babies cry.
 

Flame Alchemist

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
3,697
Reaction score
323
BF3 Was the ish but MW3 kills in graphics

edit: Xbox360 by the way

wait what? was it me or did you say mw3 in graphics kills bf3?

OT: mw3 is a waste of time compared to bf3, if the matter is multiplay
 

Ray Ray Uzumaki

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
1,135
Reaction score
63
i play both and no doubt BF3 is better overall but the USAS in it is starting to kill it when people use it on the huge maps its so stupid but Duty is always nice to go back to and beat up on people since BF3 makes you a better player
 

mcchikeneater

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,875
Reaction score
326
Do you know if they traded it in for BF3?

some of them did, ive never played bf3 i tried the beta and hated it so i never bother buying the game itself.


I agree with you 100%......you forgot about the HORRIBLE SPAWNING.....I mean its just god awful

the maps are also pretty crappy....except for like 2 or 3

forgot about that, the spawns are very dumb, you kill someone then they spawn right behind you. so annoying.

the maps are total junk. and everyone always votes the worst ones. they have a couple good ones but thats it. i wish MW3 had nuketown on it lol.
 

Flame Alchemist

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
3,697
Reaction score
323
Mw3 uses same graphics as mw2, bf3 is way different the bf2, bf2142, and the bfbc games

yeah call of duty uses the same engine since mw1 (cod 4).
bf3 has a brand new (an awesome one at that) engine.

and I have to say bf2bc2 had way better graphics than cod. let alone bf3
 
Top