- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,494
- Reaction score
- 987
oddly enough i agree... surprisingly deep post

Well I did say it'd be up for interpretation based on the persons own life experience.
Life is synonymous with memory, experience and past. Our language itself isolates and organizes elements of our world for general comprehension, it's a system based on categorical distinction, but as needed as such a mode of identification is to the human mind, it also inherently implies false division.
Our experience of life is always delayed by our perception so we can never truly experience the present moment. That's why I said life is a memory.
Who let the dogs out, who, who, who, who?![]()
go away rabbit But we don't need to delude ourselves into saying it belongs to them. They merely inherit it and truth be told it's arrogant to even say that. The earth has been around long before humans.The end of your sentence is the exact meaning of the phrase. The earth should always be viewed as belonging to the next generation and in that way we should act as to leave a better future since it's them who have to live with the effects of ancestral decisions.
Nope I'm just a guy who is interested in psychology, science, philosophy, business, history, life etc and likes to study it in his own time. Do you have any resources you could refer me to? I'd like to learn more of what you know about quantum physics, science etc. The time delay of perception I mentioned is neuroscience btw. That doesn't conflict with the theory of relativity.At the moment that is true. Never truly experience the present situation is a grossly overstated. As reactions do exist, otherwise you're saying that people live in a state of constant past. Quantum Physics doesn't even ahree with this. While Time does not exist in general mechanics, people live in a state of constant present. All other things are as you said in the past memories. However; if time does exist and us not truely relative then that would metamorph scientific foundations. As time would be linear as a line. But as we know it now tine does not exist, perhaps in the practices of clinical psychology would that be true but not ecen physics agrees with this instead it's a constant present. Since there is no "past memory" sibce memories are malleable and therefore not true memories so how cam one delineate what is the past if the past is not constant as the future is? Therefore humans live in a state of present.
Still though don't take this as me saying your wrong, far from it, there are just multiple interpretations of it deoending on whom one asks. You seem to be rather knowledgeable in this is it right to assume that you are a practitioner of behavioral psychology or a degree holder?