[Theory] Theory on Dressrosa, Rebecca and Toys

[Punk Hazard]

Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

We know that when someone directly affects a Strawhat on this level of danger, Oda does it to incorporate a deep, emotional message. This is no exception. I think Oda will make it so that the Strawhats have a time limit for the events to be reversed before they forget. The time limit will run out, but they won't forget their Nakama, showing how deep their bond really is.

Now, here's where someone else comes in: Rebecca. The way I see it, this will show that Rebecca is Nakama material, since she too didn't forget.

This will mean that either:

1. Rebecca will join the Strawhats along with the Toy Soldier. They will sail with the Strawhats until they defeat Doflamingo, freeing Dressrosa from its two rules. This is assuming Doflamingo won't be defeated this arc. The rules affecting them so negatively will be incentive for them to join and sail with the SH.

2. Doffy will indeed be defeated and Rebecca will be an honorary Strawhat while living on Dressrosa, like Vivi and Alabasta.

 

[Narutohokage7]

Yea, its like what I was thinking. Rebecca definitly seems to be Nakama material.

 

[Fireplay]

Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.

 

[Vincent Pryce]

This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.

 

[Jellal Fernandes]

Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.

No Just no...:devil:

 

[Narutohokage7]

Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.

Nah, I think Bart the Bar Bar man will ask to join.

This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.

I don't think thats what Slade was saying.

 

[Hexuze]

Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.

 

[Punk Hazard]

This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.

I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.

Monet is dead bro.

 

[Dr Strangelove]

Nice work connecting the nakama being turned and some sense of danger for the Straw Hats
Although I don't think it will be the case they wont forget. I really cant see that happening and would be a little annoyed with Oda if the time limit ran out and the Straw Hats didn't forget. Although props for finding a legitimate reason for Rebecca to join the crew. Also ever thought that Law could have done that to the toys? We have seen him being able to switch personalities around? Why not giving inanimate objects personality? Also it is stated that Doflamingo brought a fruit user 10 years ago that did this to the toys. Law would have been 16 at that time? It is possible he was with Doflamingo then?

 

[Vincent Pryce]

Nah, I think Bart the Bar Bar man will ask to join.


I don't think thats what Slade was saying.

Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

Come again?

I didn't really read about the Rebacca part, because he lost credibility with his second sentence.
Anyway, I read it now, and there is no real basis for Rebacca joining or not. Honestly, no basis at all.

OP, you should do your research next time.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

People having been saying what Oda said? lol. Unless I don't get a link, this is pure fan BS.

I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.

lolno. You are wrong. And that's it. Jora can turn people into art, not toys. What comic are you reading?

 

[Punk Hazard]

Nice work connecting the nakama being turned and some sense of danger for the Straw Hats
Although I don't think it will be the case they wont forget. I really cant see that happening and would be a little annoyed with Oda if the time limit ran out and the Straw Hats didn't forget. Although props for finding a legitimate reason for Rebecca to join the crew. Also ever thought that Law could have done that to the toys? We have seen him being able to switch personalities around? Why not giving inanimate objects personality? Also it is stated that Doflamingo brought a fruit user 10 years ago that did this to the toys. Law would have been 16 at that time? It is possible he was with Doflamingo then?

Hmm, it's possible. Law did serve under Doffy for decade. I like the idea that Law could have done it.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

Come again?

I didn't really read about the Rebacca part, because he lost credibility with his second sentence.
Anyway, I read it now, and there is no real basis for Rebacca joining or not. Honestly, no basis at all.

OP, you should do your research next time.



People having been saying what Oda said? lol. Unless I don't get a link, this is pure fan BS.



lolno. You are wrong. And that's it. Jora can turn people into art, not toys. What comic are you reading?

Really? It wasn't explicitly stated that Jora turns people into art, so it's a possibility she is the one turning people into toys.

 

[Hexuze]

I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.



Monet is dead bro.

Yeah she is dead but did you read rinnemaki theory on why she may be alive?

 

[Vincent Pryce]

Really? It wasn't explicitly stated that Jora turns people into art, so it's a possibility she is the one turning people into toys.

Okay then.
Honestly, don't you think it's a coincidence that the SHs, including Sunny-Go, turned into art-''toys'', but all other toys in Dressrosa (from what've seen) not? Brook didn't even resemble a toy. So did Nami. Just compare the SHs and Sunny-go to the toys at Dressrosa. The only that kind of resembles a toy is CHopper.

Moreover, do you honestly think that Dolfmanigo would let such an imporatant pawn go after the SHs? The toys are vital for Doflmanigo. You would guess he'll try to keep the person who turns people into toys safe, right? Why would he let her go after the SHs, where she might get killed/captured? Wouldn't that be ****ing stupid?

Anyhow, you can believe whatever you want. Sounds ****ing retarded to me.

 

[Aertes]

Okay then.
Honestly, don't you think it's a coincidence that the SHs, including Sunny-Go, turned into art-''toys'', but all other toys in Dressrosa (from what've seen) not? Brook didn't even resemble a toy. So did Nami. Just compare the SHs and Sunny-go to the toys at Dressrosa. The only that kind of resembles a toy is CHopper.

Moreover, do you honestly think that Dolfmanigo would let such an imporatant pawn go after the SHs? The toys are vital for Doflmanigo. You would guess he'll try to keep the person who turns people into toys safe, right? Why would he let her go after the SHs, where she might get killed/captured? Wouldn't that be ****ing stupid?

Anyhow, you can believe whatever you want. Sounds ****ing retarded to me.

Seeing how one of the toys very easily got close to a Strawhat member, we can assume that DonFlamingo's measures to keep toys "controlled" are not that good.
DonFlamingo already knew that Luffy would fall for his trap and be lured to the Colloseum, as he knew that Law would be away from the Sunny to make the "delivery".
He also made sure to deceive Sanji with Violet. He was aware that the ship wasn't guarded by the the strong ones. I don't see why he wouldn't send a valuable member to take care of the Sunny. So, what you're saying doesn't make any sense.
I don't think that the user that turned people into toys was the art lady, but the reasoning you provided for that is poor and senseless.

OT: I like the fear-Nakama connection you made. Tt seems plausible. On the other hand, now that we found out that Rebecca has a certain bond with one of the toys, it's seems to me as she would stay with him. I also agree with that possibility that DonFlamingo might not be defeat at this arc, but I think that the toys will be turned to humans again by the end of the arc.

 

[Vincent Pryce]

DonFlamingo already knew that Luffy would fall for his trap and be lured to the Colloseum, as he knew that Law would be away from the Sunny to make the "delivery".
He also made sure to deceive Sanji with Violet. He was aware that the ship wasn't guarded by the the strong ones. I don't see why he wouldn't send a valuable member to take care of the Sunny. So, what you're saying doesn't make any sense.
I don't think that the user that turned people into toys was the art lady

If someone is vital for you, you would try to keep him really safe, right? There is difference between valuable and vital. Doflamingo has more strong men that he could've sent after the weaker Strawhats

Seeing how one of the toys very easily got close to a Strawhat member, we can assume that DonFlamingo's measures to keep toys "controlled" are not that good.

I never said that the toys had to be controlled, I said that the person who makes them has to be kept safe.

but the reasoning you provided for that is poor and senseless.

Would say the same for your reasoning. Also, I provided two arguments. You just picked out the weaker one.

 

[Fireplay]

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.

Sorry to burst your bubble...but Monet's been dead for a while now.

 

[Aertes]

If someone is vital for you, you would try to keep him really safe, right? There is difference between valuable and vital. Doflamingo has more strong men that he could've sent after the weaker Strawhats
Would say the same for you reasoning. Also, I provided two arguments. You just picked out the weaker one.

I already said that I don't think the fruit user who can turn people into toys is the same person with the art lady, so why should I argue if I agree?

I just think that DonFlamingo isn't as careful as he should be with the toys, seeing how easy Franky got close to one and how easily he revealed two of their secrets. He is too reassured that the laws and the memory loss will keep the toys under his control. Vital? Maybe. That doesn't change the fact that he wasn't as careful as he should be with them.

 

[Vincent Pryce]

I just think that DonFlamingo isn't as careful as he should be with the toys, seeing how easy Franky got close to one and how easily he revealed two of their secrets. He is too reassured that the laws and the memory loss will keep the toys under his control. Vital? Maybe. That doesn't change the fact that he wasn't as careful as he should be with them.

I never said he should be careful with the toys themself, but with the person who has the toy toy DF. One toy even got thrown away this chapter. Just look it at this way, if one toy dies/breaks/runs away Doflamingo can just let said person make another toy. But if said person (the guy with the DF) dies/gets caputre, Doflamingo won't be able to create new toys.

I already said that I don't think the fruit user who can turn people into toys is the same person with the art lady, so why should I argue if I agree?

You agreed with my point, but not with my second argument

 

[NarutoBmx33]

Pryce, what you're saying sounds like your dragging out your mistakes.