[Theory] Theory on Dressrosa, Rebecca and Toys

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

We know that when someone directly affects a Strawhat on this level of danger, Oda does it to incorporate a deep, emotional message. This is no exception. I think Oda will make it so that the Strawhats have a time limit for the events to be reversed before they forget. The time limit will run out, but they won't forget their Nakama, showing how deep their bond really is.

Now, here's where someone else comes in: Rebecca. The way I see it, this will show that Rebecca is Nakama material, since she too didn't forget.

This will mean that either:

1. Rebecca will join the Strawhats along with the Toy Soldier. They will sail with the Strawhats until they defeat Doflamingo, freeing Dressrosa from its two rules. This is assuming Doflamingo won't be defeated this arc. The rules affecting them so negatively will be incentive for them to join and sail with the SH.

2. Doffy will indeed be defeated and Rebecca will be an honorary Strawhat while living on Dressrosa, like Vivi and Alabasta.
 
Last edited:

Narutohokage7

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
8,783
Reaction score
935
Yea, its like what I was thinking. Rebecca definitly seems to be Nakama material.
 

Fireplay

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
410
Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.
 

Vincent Pryce

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
686
Reaction score
133
This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.
 

Narutohokage7

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
8,783
Reaction score
935
Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.
Nah, I think Bart the Bar Bar man will ask to join.
This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.

I don't think thats what Slade was saying.
 

Hexuze

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Reaction score
1,533
Seems plausible. Although i'm #TeamBellamy4Strawhat

Rebecca seems like a potential Nakama though. And the SW's need more girls.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
This theory fails because you can't read a comic book properly.
The Strawhats never turned into toys, they turned into art.
I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.

Monet is dead bro.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dr Strangelove

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
10,057
Reaction score
608
Nice work connecting the nakama being turned and some sense of danger for the Straw Hats :p
Although I don't think it will be the case they wont forget. I really cant see that happening and would be a little annoyed with Oda if the time limit ran out and the Straw Hats didn't forget. Although props for finding a legitimate reason for Rebecca to join the crew. Also ever thought that Law could have done that to the toys? We have seen him being able to switch personalities around? Why not giving inanimate objects personality? Also it is stated that Doflamingo brought a fruit user 10 years ago that did this to the toys. Law would have been 16 at that time? It is possible he was with Doflamingo then?
 

Vincent Pryce

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
686
Reaction score
133
Nah, I think Bart the Bar Bar man will ask to join.


I don't think thats what Slade was saying.

Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

Come again?

I didn't really read about the Rebacca part, because he lost credibility with his second sentence.
Anyway, I read it now, and there is no real basis for Rebacca joining or not. Honestly, no basis at all.

OP, you should do your research next time.

I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

People having been saying what Oda said? lol. Unless I don't get a link, this is pure fan BS.

I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.

lolno. You are wrong. And that's it. Jora can turn people into art, not toys. What comic are you reading?
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
Nice work connecting the nakama being turned and some sense of danger for the Straw Hats :p
Although I don't think it will be the case they wont forget. I really cant see that happening and would be a little annoyed with Oda if the time limit ran out and the Straw Hats didn't forget. Although props for finding a legitimate reason for Rebecca to join the crew. Also ever thought that Law could have done that to the toys? We have seen him being able to switch personalities around? Why not giving inanimate objects personality? Also it is stated that Doflamingo brought a fruit user 10 years ago that did this to the toys. Law would have been 16 at that time? It is possible he was with Doflamingo then?

Hmm, it's possible. Law did serve under Doffy for decade. I like the idea that Law could have done it.
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
Ok, so in this chapter, we learned that those who are turned into toys are eventually forgotten by their loved ones. We also know that this has happened to some of the Strawhats. So here's where my theory begins.

Come again?

I didn't really read about the Rebacca part, because he lost credibility with his second sentence.
Anyway, I read it now, and there is no real basis for Rebacca joining or not. Honestly, no basis at all.

OP, you should do your research next time.



People having been saying what Oda said? lol. Unless I don't get a link, this is pure fan BS.



lolno. You are wrong. And that's it. Jora can turn people into art, not toys. What comic are you reading?

Really? It wasn't explicitly stated that Jora turns people into art, so it's a possibility she is the one turning people into toys.
 

Hexuze

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Reaction score
1,533
I'm pretty sure they turned into toys that looked like famous art.



Monet is dead bro.
Yeah she is dead but did you read rinnemaki theory on why she may be alive?
 

Vincent Pryce

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
686
Reaction score
133
Really? It wasn't explicitly stated that Jora turns people into art, so it's a possibility she is the one turning people into toys.

Okay then.
Honestly, don't you think it's a coincidence that the SHs, including Sunny-Go, turned into art-''toys'', but all other toys in Dressrosa (from what've seen) not? Brook didn't even resemble a toy. So did Nami. Just compare the SHs and Sunny-go to the toys at Dressrosa. The only that kind of resembles a toy is CHopper.

Moreover, do you honestly think that Dolfmanigo would let such an imporatant pawn go after the SHs? The toys are vital for Doflmanigo. You would guess he'll try to keep the person who turns people into toys safe, right? Why would he let her go after the SHs, where she might get killed/captured? Wouldn't that be ****ing stupid?

Anyhow, you can believe whatever you want. Sounds ****ing retarded to me.
 

Aertes

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
4,667
Reaction score
658
Okay then.
Honestly, don't you think it's a coincidence that the SHs, including Sunny-Go, turned into art-''toys'', but all other toys in Dressrosa (from what've seen) not? Brook didn't even resemble a toy. So did Nami. Just compare the SHs and Sunny-go to the toys at Dressrosa. The only that kind of resembles a toy is CHopper.

Moreover, do you honestly think that Dolfmanigo would let such an imporatant pawn go after the SHs? The toys are vital for Doflmanigo. You would guess he'll try to keep the person who turns people into toys safe, right? Why would he let her go after the SHs, where she might get killed/captured? Wouldn't that be ****ing stupid?

Anyhow, you can believe whatever you want. Sounds ****ing retarded to me.

Seeing how one of the toys very easily got close to a Strawhat member, we can assume that DonFlamingo's measures to keep toys "controlled" are not that good.
DonFlamingo already knew that Luffy would fall for his trap and be lured to the Colloseum, as he knew that Law would be away from the Sunny to make the "delivery".
He also made sure to deceive Sanji with Violet. He was aware that the ship wasn't guarded by the the strong ones. I don't see why he wouldn't send a valuable member to take care of the Sunny. So, what you're saying doesn't make any sense.
I don't think that the user that turned people into toys was the art lady, but the reasoning you provided for that is poor and senseless.

OT: I like the fear-Nakama connection you made. Tt seems plausible. On the other hand, now that we found out that Rebecca has a certain bond with one of the toys, it's seems to me as she would stay with him. I also agree with that possibility that DonFlamingo might not be defeat at this arc, but I think that the toys will be turned to humans again by the end of the arc.
 

Vincent Pryce

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
686
Reaction score
133
DonFlamingo already knew that Luffy would fall for his trap and be lured to the Colloseum, as he knew that Law would be away from the Sunny to make the "delivery".
He also made sure to deceive Sanji with Violet. He was aware that the ship wasn't guarded by the the strong ones. I don't see why he wouldn't send a valuable member to take care of the Sunny. So, what you're saying doesn't make any sense.
I don't think that the user that turned people into toys was the art lady

If someone is vital for you, you would try to keep him really safe, right? There is difference between valuable and vital. Doflamingo has more strong men that he could've sent after the weaker Strawhats

Seeing how one of the toys very easily got close to a Strawhat member, we can assume that DonFlamingo's measures to keep toys "controlled" are not that good.

I never said that the toys had to be controlled, I said that the person who makes them has to be kept safe.

but the reasoning you provided for that is poor and senseless.

Would say the same for your reasoning. Also, I provided two arguments. You just picked out the weaker one.
 
Last edited:

Fireplay

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
410
I rather have Monet, besides people have been saying that Oda said has said the next SH is a girl + enemry. So Monet fits those qualities.

OT:Nice theory.

Sorry to burst your bubble...but Monet's been dead for a while now.
 

Aertes

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
4,667
Reaction score
658
If someone is vital for you, you would try to keep him really safe, right? There is difference between valuable and vital. Doflamingo has more strong men that he could've sent after the weaker Strawhats
Would say the same for you reasoning. Also, I provided two arguments. You just picked out the weaker one.
I already said that I don't think the fruit user who can turn people into toys is the same person with the art lady, so why should I argue if I agree?

I just think that DonFlamingo isn't as careful as he should be with the toys, seeing how easy Franky got close to one and how easily he revealed two of their secrets. He is too reassured that the laws and the memory loss will keep the toys under his control. Vital? Maybe. That doesn't change the fact that he wasn't as careful as he should be with them.
 

Vincent Pryce

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
686
Reaction score
133
I just think that DonFlamingo isn't as careful as he should be with the toys, seeing how easy Franky got close to one and how easily he revealed two of their secrets. He is too reassured that the laws and the memory loss will keep the toys under his control. Vital? Maybe. That doesn't change the fact that he wasn't as careful as he should be with them.

I never said he should be careful with the toys themself, but with the person who has the toy toy DF. One toy even got thrown away this chapter. Just look it at this way, if one toy dies/breaks/runs away Doflamingo can just let said person make another toy. But if said person (the guy with the DF) dies/gets caputre, Doflamingo won't be able to create new toys.

I already said that I don't think the fruit user who can turn people into toys is the same person with the art lady, so why should I argue if I agree?

You agreed with my point, but not with my second argument
 

NarutoBmx33

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
482
Reaction score
14
Pryce, what you're saying sounds like your dragging out your mistakes.
 
Top