Can you prove the Danzo/madara wrong? No. I can thoufh this theory.
Why? You dissapoint me..
it is not possible for Minato to be Dan and Tsunade Child. I will cover this again Minato was trained by Jiraiya before dan died or at the very most around the same time frame.
Dan was 27 when he died, and was roughly the same age as the Sannin. That would put his death roughly 23 years before the series started. Given that Minato graduated the academy at 10, which would be putting him graduating the academy at 13 years before the series started.
Kakashi was 26 at the series starts and became a Jounin at 13. So Kakashi became a Jounin 13 years before the series start. Now how could Minato be becoming a Genin at the same time that Kakashi was becoming a Jounin. Naruto would also be born only a year later which would mean Minato would be fathering Naruto while he was around 11 years old
If you want to look at it from another angle Fugaku Uchiha is from the same generation as Minato. Fugaku died at 40, which puts him around 32 at the time of Minato death. This gives a rough age on how old Minato was when he died. Since Minato was around 32 and Graduated the academy at 10 this would put him training with Jiraiya at around 22 years before the series starts. Which Put him in charge of Team Minato around the same time it has been shown that other Jounin have teams. Even if you give it play room of it being approximate it doesn't sync with the timeframe of Tsunade and Dans relationship.
I won't deny the possiblity of Naruto and Minato being of Senju descent (though I still doubt even that), Put they are not directly related to Tsunade.
Proves this argument wrong!
