The Reality of a Manufactured Crisis

[Aim64C]

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see links

As Naruto Base would say: "Manga Fact."

America - your country is under attack.

And you are being attacked by a very powerful machine:

You must be registered for see links

"Between Dec 2010 and Nov 2013, the Catholic Charities Diocese of Galveston received $15,549,078 in federal grants from Health & Human Services for “Unaccompanied Alien Children Project” with a program description of “Refugee and Entry Assistance.”

Last year, the Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth received $350,000 from Department of Homeland Security for “citizenship and education training” with a program description of “citizenship and immigration services.”

Between September 2010 and September 2013, the Catholic Charities of Dallas received $823,658 from the Department of Homeland Security for “Citizenship Education Training” for “refugee and entrant assistance.”

From Dec 2012 to January 2014, Baptist Child & Family Services received $62,111,126 in federal grants from Health & Human Services for “Unaccompanied Alien Children Program.”
- See more at: http://www.libertynews.com/2014/07/exclusive-hhs-bankrolled-catholic-and-baptist-church-from-2010-to-2013-to-prepare-for-obamas-2014-invasion/#sthash.HrWpvYzz.dpuf"

The Mormon church is also involved in this - which explains this little bit:

You must be registered for see links

Which - I agree with the article's analysis. I've listened to Beck's radio program for a few years, now - and find the manner in which he represented his viewership to be... slanderous. While that was, perhaps, not his intent - it was the reality of the perception, and it instantly drove a wedge between the various camps of thought on this issue.

"Beck's fans should expect more from him than this. Rather than put himself above his own for a sanctimonious finger-wagging lecture, Beck should be using his spotlight to explain why his fans feel the way the way they do -- even if he disagrees with them.

Instead he throws them under the bus for the likes of a Joe Scarborough to feast on.

Had Beck simply done what he thought was right instead of dividing everyone through the public trumpeting of his works and bragging about the "danger" he was putting himself in and harshly judging those who dared disagree with him, everyone, including Beck, would have been better served.

Most importantly, had Beck just gone about doing what he thinks is right as quietly as someone with his profile could, it would have lessened the possibility of his works being used as additional recruiting material for the human traffickers exploiting these poor children. "

And, of course, another one of my favorite radio hosts has his opinion on it:

[video=youtube;gG4z9AkNhlY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG4z9AkNhlY[/video]

Part of the reason I think Savage has the radio following that he does is because he has strong opinions with logical backing and isn't afraid to speak his mind. Americans have gotten very caught up in trying to 'not offend' - and Savage just doesn't give a shit if you're offended or not.

Which - I do have to credit Savage for prompting my own investigation into the 'humanitarian crisis.'

America is under attack - not just on the borders - but also in the media.

You will not find this type of -basic- journalism on NBC, CNN, FOX, etc. And do you understand why?

The 'main stream' headlines and discussion are always along the lines of: "Democrats propose... meanwhile Republicans resist, saying it ... " That is 90% of the talk at even the "Faux News" (which is supposed to be some kind of horrible conservative spin machine).

The talk is never about the what. It is never about facts or reality. It is always about who is talking and what they are saying.

And that is specifically to divide us. It is European politics. Convince one group that another group is out to destroy them - never discuss reality. Reality exposes the corruption and the fact that the people in government seek the power to control the lives of others (just for the sake of being dictators).

Those of you in other countries - pay attention.

This is how you destroy Rome.

You let it destroy itself.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

You had me until you said Beck. I've always found his ranting to be inane. There are too many communists in power. Libertarians are the only people that haven't been bought by private interests, but they are being slandered by the mainstream. Terrorists trying to bring down our great nation all of them. Time for the people to take charge

 

[dark legion]

:hooray: ... did u solve the problem !!!

 

[Aim64C]

You had me until you said Beck. I've always found his ranting to be inane. There are too many communists in power. Libertarians are the only people that haven't been bought by private interests, but they are being slandered by the mainstream. Terrorists trying to bring down our great nation all of them. Time for the people to take charge

You really didn't read what I had to say, at all, did you?

How do you expect to be relevant in the world of 'understanding things' when you only read the fragments you think you will agree with?

Bluntly - it doesn't matter what kind of brain you're packing if you use it like a fool.

 

[Lord of the Kings]

This book already predicted everything

You must be registered for see images

 

[Cunning Linguist]

You really didn't read what I had to say, at all, did you?

How do you expect to be relevant in the world of 'understanding things' when you only read the fragments you think you will agree with?

Bluntly - it doesn't matter what kind of brain you're packing if you use it like a fool.

No. No I didn't. Your bluntness is refreshing though

 

[Aim64C]

:hooray: ... did u solve the problem !!!

It's pretty simple. Tell the Mexican government (who coordinated with U.S. subsidies to transport the illegals from Guatemala and other places to the U.S. border) to take them back.

When they refuse - bomb the railways they are using to transport the illegals. Then tell them to take them back and to give our Marine back.

When they refuse - give Central America notice that they are going to receive those illegals back (plus interest - there are more than enough that are still here - find the ones that just registered for driver's licenses in California and take the judge that ruled it lawful with them).

When they start to object - send in the military to secure a few of their airports. Then land our transports full of the illegals and send them back home with a sandwich and a flier explaining to their parents that our president is a lying son of a ***** and he is currently being executed for treason and misleading so many people.

That solves the immediate problem.

Solving the immigration problem?

That's actually even easier.

Social Security: Gone. No more.

End -all- government subsidies to families.

End the income tax. All federal revenues are to be derived from taxes on state revenues. That means all states must run a balanced budget or figure out how to 'esplain' to the other states why they can't contribute to the pool.

That means all federal taxes are gone. No more.

End federal sponsoring of education. No more.

In fact - all federal spending shall be restricted to defense and a few minor infrastructure demands. All expansions of federal responsibility must be approved via an amendment to the Constitution.

End federal minimum wage.

End the federal reserve. Only gold and silver may be used as legal tender - per the constitution.

All federal lands will be turned back over to the states. The federal government will not arbitrarily own land it is not actively using.

The national border shall be enforced. However - the point of border screening will primarily be to inspect for infectious diseases and for affiliation with criminal institutions. There will be no arbitrary limit on the number of migrants, no fees for entry or permission, etc.

The immigration problem has now been solved.

Since migrants don't get to somehow qualify for federal benefits - there is no issue with them coming here and hanging around (whether they have a job, or not). If there isn't a way for them to make a living - then they'll go back home (or send word back home that there's not much to do that is better than where they came from).

Since they are not being subsidized - it is little/no cost for them to live. Therefor any existence they manage to sustain is a net positive. Just as my family immigrated from Germany and had to 'start from scratch' - they can do the same thing. They'll build an internal economy off of farming and basic carpentry before expanding into other roles that interface more with the established economy. The two will merge and the overall economy will be better for it.

The primary problem with immigration, today, is the subsidies.

The other problem is income tax. Bluntly - it's unconstitutional for the very reason that it creates the very problems we see today. "I pay taxes - I deserve benefits." Which leads to a fascist government. It also leads to internal conflict amongst people - namely, that there is a group of people that might be getting paid 'under the table' and not paying due taxes.

By getting rid of the income tax - there's no issue. How each state decides to go about collecting the taxes for their revenues is up to them. Some will side with an income tax (and collapse economically) while others will simply use sales tax.

The other problem is with minimum wage.

A black welfare baby who realized after dropping out of highschool that it was a very bad idea is at a huge disadvantage when compared to an illegal worker. He will simply not get a job in an environment where illegal workers can be paid less than the minimum wage - since he must work the minimum wage.

The same with a white welfare baby.

By getting rid of the minimum wage and the federal reserve, you will deliver a very hard blow to the process of inflation. States that refuse to adopt a property tax will also be at a huge advantage as people require far less in the way of 'monthly income' to survive. A person can survive off of odd jobs and sustenance farming.

Therefor the natural spectrum of wages will be restored and people will not be penalized for saving money through the stealth tax of inflation.

Basically - we return our country to the economic, business, and tax policies it had around 1900.

 

[straightup]

im not going to begin to talk about how wrong you are. You want to destroy over 100 years of progression because of what? some immigrants? You are the prime example of a tyranny. **** the poor am I right?

 

[Anorien16]

im not going to begin to talk about how wrong you are. You want to destroy over 100 years of progression because of what? some immigrants? You are the prime example of a tyranny. **** the poor am I right?

Hmmmmm .... can u explain how progress would be affected by removing Illegal immigrants?

 

[Aim64C]

im not going to begin to talk about how wrong you are.

Please do.

You want to destroy over 100 years of progression because of what? some immigrants?

Actually - I was for all of that before the present case of treason by our president.

What you seem to believe is that time=progress=improvement.

For starters - you must ask what "progress" is. Progress is merely change - it is the transition from one state to another state.

Therefor - progress does not equal improvement. Time does indeed equate to change -but time does not equate to improvement.

There is a fundamental question you must ask yourself before this discussion continues.

Who is in charge of your life?

Is it you?

Or is it a government?

[video=youtube;OGvYqaxSPp4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGvYqaxSPp4[/video]

You are the prime example of a tyranny.

How so?

I wish to get rid of a system where people are empowered to take away your home if you do not hand them money.

I wish to get rid of a system where you are not allowed to work unless you hand over a certain amount of money.

I wish to get rid of a system that forces you to hand over money with the promise to return it to you - while the people in control of that money hand it to other people for the purpose of buying votes.

Please - explain to me how I am a tyrant.

I may believe in very strong and very bold action - when it is necessary - but I ultimately lay no claim to your life, the income you make, or the property you own. It is not mine. It is not my children's. Yours is not mine to covet.

**** the poor am I right?

Please, tell me what it is that I can do to prevent the poor from being poor.

Shall I give them my computer? Will that end their being poor?

How about the food in my freezer? Will that end their poverty?

How about turning over my home to them? Will that end their poverty?

Or.... how about I just hand them a portion of my pay check? That will fix it, right - now they are getting an income - right?

Welfare is the most destructive and insidious program to have ever been constructed. It makes it possible for people to do nothing while blaming their problems on some ambiguous group of 'rich people.'

I've lived out of my car and wondered where the money for another meal would come from. I've struggled with being unemployed (and refused to file for unemployment, food stamps, or any federal aid).

Do you know what got me out of that?

Work.

I took a job and would work it. If it was not going anywhere - I would use it as a reference to apply for a higher paying job. If the conditions were dangerous - I would submit two weeks and leave respectfully.

But I had to take risks. I had to look at the possibility of starving, going out on a limb with a distant job (requiring moving), or begging friends for assistance (which, for the basics like food - is something I'd rather die than do). If I could have simply said: "Eh... I don't think that will pan out better than this check I get from the government" - then I wouldn't have. The inconvenience of moving wouldn't have passed the test.

Which is precisely what welfare does to people. They do not take risks. They -do not- progress into any state but that of apathy and lethargy.

So, I do not believe "**** the poor." I believe that the poor are to be held to the same standards as everyone else. Lowering our standards for people is both insulting to their being and destructive to their potential.

That does not mean I do not believe in aiding them - but that is not an institution of our government.

The moment you give the government the ability to take money from one group of people and assign it to another group of people - you can no longer have truly democratic processes within the government.