The price of too much knowledge? Maturity?

[Draekon]

i don't think there's such a thing as too much knowledge. there is nothing wrong with atheism but there is much wrong with superstition for obvious reasons

and i can't speak for where you live but in Europe and even NY to an extent artists are celebrated now more than ever

 

[Fountain]

i don't think there's such a thing as too much knowledge. there is nothing wrong with atheism but there is much wrong with superstition for obvious reasons

and i can't speak for where you live but in Europe and even NY to an extent artists are celebrated now more than ever

There's nothing wrong with atheism per se but there is definitely something wrong with being closed minded, disrespectful, and arrogant. And there is such thing as too much knowledge and being overly analytical and self-conscious. I didn't think there would be but there is. All things can be harmful in excess, one way or the other.

Yes, but it's only certain art. There's a lot of creativity out there that goes unnoticed because either it isn't mainstream or is considered weird etc. And very often those artists get shunned for it.

 

[Waindo]

That depends on the individual not the knowledge. There are innumerable terrible things that can be recognized as the unvarnished truth in the world. For instance; all of us will die so there's no real meaning to life because everything will cease to exist. If you end up with that mindset, that would be dangerous and there's a posibbility one could end up suicidal and depressed.

On the other hand if you rather not put a lid on it there and instead turn it into a positive light and conclude that because time's limited you're going to embrace and enjoy every moment you can so you won’t have any regrets, Then you get some extra self-confidence and the guts to accomplish your dreams.

There are a multitude of truths that are present in the world and each truth can be seen in more then one light. Hence why the final answer to this question largely depends upon the individual whom is attaining too much knowledge. Will they decide to see the positives, or will they blindly accept the negatives.

 

[lImmortal Regis]

I know the feeling.... but that will change in time , for now...just think of good things that will happen the fun... enjoy something that you like. What do you like? Even if you dont believe in something, try to believe...because i still do... and i feel that kind of presence...the magic and thats what im feeling right now while typing...and i can tell you that, it really feels good.

 

[jimbobbity]

I understand what you mean. The key (at least for me) is to look at both perspectives at once. See the naivete and the potential that the imagination can bring to an object, but know what the reality is as well. Expand your views and im sure you could easily see it again.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

i don't think there's such a thing as too much knowledge. there is nothing wrong with atheism but there is much wrong with superstition for obvious reasons

and i can't speak for where you live but in Europe and even NY to an extent artists are celebrated now more than ever

Labeling yourself "athiest" is being a "sore-loser" about religion. It's just as pointless.

How about NOT believing in a god...well, for obvious reasons.Categorizing yourself as "athiest" is still appeasing to the idea that religion is an actual thing, it's self-contradictory.In my eyes, you shouldn't entertain a religion.

I'm not an "atheist", just because YOU couldn't think for yourself.Religion ISN'T an actual thing, that's why I don't believe in it. The nerve of people...

OT:

There's no such thing as "too much knowledge"...the problem is, INDECISION.Not knowing what you want, or how to get it.

The more knowledge, the more disconnected you feel from humanity...these people are stuck in a fantasy.AND THEY DO NOT WANT TO SEE THE TRUTH.That's that self-denial I KEEP talking about.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

I understand what you mean. The key (at least for me) is to look at both perspectives at once. See the naivete and the potential that the imagination can bring to an object, but know what the reality is as well. Expand your views and im sure you could easily see it again.

You're so much of an appeaser.

You can't "look at both perspectives at once"...that's super silly.That's a wannabe mentality.lmao. That's called minding someone elses business based off of a RULE. It's super disingenuous.

I noticed you just think that statement makes sense, but it absolutely doesn't. You can never "look at both perspectives at once"...you say it as if that other perspective IS YOURS...when it's not.It's not YOUR perspective, so you can't TAKE it as your own and have your own perspective, at the same time.That's super in denial and super disloyal. You can only take another person's perspective into CONSIDERATION. Which I would do, if that other person was ever telling the truth.

You can only see through your own eyes...that other persons perspective ISN'T your perspective, so why would you go against your own perspective just to appease to someone elses...as if your some sort of fusee, or something.

I notice your views are rule-based...not "reasons why" or any thing to do with entailment...it's just made up rules, that don't make sense.

Looking at both "perspectives" at the same time...is actually impossible.Doesn't make any kind of sense.

 

[jimbobbity]

You're so much of an appeaser.

You can't "look at both perspectives at once"...that's super silly.That's a wannabe mentality.lmao. That's called minding someone elses business based off of a RULE. It's super disingenuous.

I noticed you just think that statement makes sense, but it absolutely doesn't. You can never "look at both perspectives at once"...you say it as if that other perspective IS YOURS...when it's not.It's not YOUR perspective, so you can't TAKE it as your own and have your own perspective, at the same time.That's super in denial and super disloyal. You can only take another person's perspective into CONSIDERATION. Which I would do, if that other person was ever telling the truth.

You can only see through your own eyes...that other persons perspective ISN'T your perspective, so why would you go against your own perspective just to appease to someone elses...as if your some sort of fusee, or something.

I notice your views are rule-based...not "reasons why" or any thing to do with entailment...it's just made up rules, that don't make sense.

Looking at both "perspectives" at the same time...is actually impossible.Doesn't make any kind of sense.

It may be impossible for you but don't try to rub that off on me. By the way im referencing remembering my own imagination and thought process as a child, not someone elses.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

It may be impossible for you but don't try to rub that off on me. By the way im referencing remembering my own imagination and thought process as a child, not someone elses.

You've made absurd statements like that in the past. Talking about "gathering everyone's perspective and understanding" type of BS.

You seem like that type of guy.

The word you meant was probably "compare"...but you STILL cannot remember EXACTLY what your perspective was like as a child, so that's still BS to me.That's down right silly, man...

But who TF compares a child's perspective to a supposedly "adult" one?WHY?

What's sense does that make.

 

[jimbobbity]

You've made absurd statements like that in the past. Talking about "gathering everyone's perspective and understanding" type of BS.

You seem like that type of guy.

The word you meant was probably "compare"...but you STILL cannot remember EXACTLY what your perspective was like as a child, so that's still BS to me.That's down right silly, man...

But who TF compares a child's perspective to a supposedly "adult" one?WHY?

What's sense does that make.

Cos thats an important part of child care. I deal with things in that area, to do with fostering, psychology etc. Like i said, dont try to rub off your one track mind on me.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Cos thats an important part of child care. I deal with things in that area, to do with fostering, psychology etc. Like i said, dont try to rub off your one track mind on me.

And you have the nerve to make that "one track mind" insertion of me, you haven't the slightest idea...I think you pretend or try to entitle yourself to seeing things on the other side, which you really can't do cause you're too distorted and incompetent.I think you're just another reverse psychological case. Sometimes, the other side is a load of BS...and you'll notice that I'll ignore, because of it. Totally what happens.

And you seek validation and approval through others...

That's an important part of child care

...Lmao! I hate people who try to follow a "criteria" on how a "child should be"...doesn't work. Like we're all designed the same or care about the same things. Sometimes, you gotta deal with some kids ACCORDINGLY...INTERFERENCE is what corrupts and distorts a child. Sometimes, letting these kids know you don't care, will be the exact thing that'll cause them to get their own act together. I've seen it.

Thinking from ONLY YOUR PERSPECTIVE, is actually PLAYING YOUR PART. Play the part of another, you'll only misconstrue.So it's self-contradictory. Sometimes playing your own part is teaching the other person about REALITY, because when you meddle, all you're doing is giving these children "high expectations" and you're encouraging a sense of entitlement.They'll go around in the world expecting other people to CARE or try to understand where they're coming from.Whatever you're teaching them, is of absolutely no use to them when they reach their adult lives.Lmao.Expecting everyone to show pity and care.

You have to be an evolved person to really understand how this REALITY works.Trying to maneuver these kids using "psychology" is just insincerity...it's all about power and control.These people want power and influence over these kids. I've seen tons of idiots in child care...too MEDDLESOME, keep it professional.

Rules don't make someone mentally developed.

And them damn kids don't care about you.

Edit:

In short,

consider the truth, not somebodies self-entitlement issues.Couldn't care less.

 

[jimbobbity]

And you have the nerve to make that "one track mind" insertion of me, you haven't the slightest idea...I think you pretend or try to entitle yourself to seeing things on the other side, which you really can't do cause you're too distorted and incompetent.I think you're just another reverse psychological case. Sometimes, the other side is a load of BS...and you'll notice that I'll ignore, because of it. Totally what happens.

And you seek validation and approval through others...



...Lmao! I hate people who try to follow a "criteria" on how a "child should be"...doesn't work. Like we're all designed the same or care about the same things. Sometimes, you gotta deal with some kids ACCORDINGLY...INTERFERENCE is what corrupts and distorts a child. Sometimes, letting these kids know you don't care, will be the exact thing that'll cause them to get their own act together. I've seen it.

Thinking from ONLY YOUR PERSPECTIVE, is actually PLAYING YOUR PART. Play the part of another, you'll only misconstrue.So it's self-contradictory. Sometimes playing your own part is teaching the other person about REALITY, because when you meddle, all you're doing is giving these children "high expectations" and you're encouraging a sense of entitlement.They'll go around in the world expecting other people to CARE or try to understand where they're coming from.Whatever you're teaching them, is of absolutely no use to them when they reach their adult lives.Lmao.Expecting everyone to show pity and care.

You have to be an evolved person to really understand how this REALITY works.Trying to maneuver these kids using "psychology" is just insincerity...it's all about power and control.These people want power and influence over these kids. I've seen tons of idiots in child care...too MEDDLESOME, keep it professional.

Rules don't make someone mentally developed.

And them damn kids don't care about you.

Edit:

In short,

consider the truth, not somebodies self-entitlement issues.Couldn't care less.

Write me a book and maybe then ill care enough to buy it because of the effort you put in.

 

[Cornson]

One such example is you denying archaeological evidence that humans originated from the African region.

Actually in 2017 a paper was released where they have found evidence (a few bones) that indicate that humans origin was in the southern region of europa that was older than the oldest remain's we have found in African region, so the very earlier humans might have originated in the southern part of europa and then migrated down on to the african continent.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Write me a book and maybe then ill care enough to buy it because of the effort you put in.

God, another socially twisted "sarcastic" remark.

 

[Yeah right]

Actually in 2017 a paper was released where they have found evidence (a few bones) that indicate that humans origin was in the southern region of europa that was older than the oldest remain's we have found in African region, so the very earlier humans might have originated in the southern part of europa and then migrated down on to the african continent.

I’m glad you read the actual paper and several articles on this subject. It almost sounded like it was confirmation of human origins from Europe, when the most likely explaination could be explained by Parallel evolution.

 

[Multiply]

Actually in 2017 a paper was released where they have found evidence (a few bones) that indicate that humans origin was in the southern region of europa that was older than the oldest remain's we have found in African region, so the very earlier humans might have originated in the southern part of europa and then migrated down on to the african continent.

I’m glad you read the actual paper and several articles on this subject. It almost sounded like it was confirmation of human origins from Europe, when the most likely explaination could be explained by Parallel evolution.

It was in Morocco, not southern Europe.