The Fiercest Warriors In History (I need opinions)!
You must be registered for see images
Based on the knowledge you already have on the different warriors posted above,
who's the deadliest or strikes you as the post skilled & powerful?
MY teacher didn't place monks as an optionFricerst.
Anyway, the most skilled fighters were probably the Shaolin monks, but they were also pacifists.
I didn't even really know what amazons where until my tech threw it out there...Well skill depends on the warrior so the best way to argue this is age and technology
Vikings used iron weapons, wooden shields, mail or no armor
Spartans used bronze and fought in formations so 1v1 Spartan is not that special
Knights ranged over a wide time period but posses the greatest technology and steel quality
Samurai had poor quality steel in the form of sand steel known as tamahagane but developed great simihing techniques. They wore leather armor and focused on spear, archery, horse riding, and lastly sword fighting
Gladiators were mainly slaves or captured fighters and would not excel against a professionaly trained soldier
Romans fought with bronze weapons as well but technology and formations > Spartans
1v1:
Knight > Viking > Samurai > Roman > Spartan
in groups
Knight > Viking > Roman > Spartan > Samurai
In the end this will depend on the commander and the skill of the warriors
EDIT: sorry thought amazons were spartans. My bad
not even a contest. the mongols win this one. maybe attilla's troops could've posed a threat to the mongols. maybe.How would a war between Mongols and Spartans go?
[video=youtube;m5nlD2CR7tI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5nlD2CR7tI[/video]not even a contest. the mongols win this one. maybe attilla's troops could've posed a threat to the mongols. maybe.
Yeah they only use their martial arts for defense.Fricerst.
Anyway, the most skilled fighters were probably the Shaolin monks, but they were also pacifists.
The Fiercest Warriors In History (I need opinions)!
You must be registered for see images
Based on the knowledge you already have on the different warriors posted above,
who's the deadliest or strikes you as the post skilled & powerful?
But the Spartans were rather dignified in victory compared to the Vikings. When I think Fiercest I think most cut-throat and savage and imposing. If the Spartans typically looted, raped and ransacked their victims I'd agree but they were essentially Greece's spear, they fought for their country and their honor Vikings fought for gain which is why I would say they are the more fierce of the two. I agree that in a one on one Spartans are going to win on average but Vikings are no push over, I'd say they're the second most imposing group in the Op's pic.Are you trying to spell fiercest? You butchered that shit.
But the Spartans, definitely. Their whole civilization was based around combat and the leader was usually the strongest one. I would say Vikings next but the Spartans lived to be killed by someone better than them in combat. That's how good they are.