Oh wow...Just..
I'm allured by topics like this and that is why I took my time to watch about 80 sth percent of the video OP posted. And there are quite a number of contradictions in this video. And I just want to point out 2 of the most glaring.
The Photoshop point
They tried to use this as a valid point supporting their flat Earth theory (I guess) claiming that when the picture (that shows a spherical like Earth)was taken on the moon, Nasa scientists somehow manipulated that picture and removed the 'supposed' square part of the Earth.
Two scenarios
1. Later on in the video, they claim that there hasn't really been any sort of journey by humans into outer space. And if we follow this train of thought then this can't be used as a point to support their theory as everything in that picture should be fake in the first place.
2. They claim all outer space programs are staged here on Earth and also say that NASA has always believed the Earth to be spherical. Now if this is also true and the moon landing was staged, why will NASA use a flat surface instead of a spherical one and go through the trouble of manipulating the picture into removing the flat part?
P.S The supposed edited part isn't even fully flat.
Sunrise and Sunset
For this point, I'm sorry to say they kinda shamed themselves here. This should be the most essential part where their theory should be solidified and they flunked it badly. They needed to explain clearly how its possible for it to be day in some places and night in another at the same time [on a flat Earth] and they didn't. Not only did they start spewing vague things, they also stylishly ignored completing it. 18:45 - 18:50 or so, during the explanation they stop abruptly and say "That takes a while to sink in" and quickly move into something else. Epic fail imo.
And these are just 2. I don't even want to get started on their "no such things as satellites" theory.
I'm allured by topics like this and that is why I took my time to watch about 80 sth percent of the video OP posted. And there are quite a number of contradictions in this video. And I just want to point out 2 of the most glaring.
The Photoshop point
They tried to use this as a valid point supporting their flat Earth theory (I guess) claiming that when the picture (that shows a spherical like Earth)was taken on the moon, Nasa scientists somehow manipulated that picture and removed the 'supposed' square part of the Earth.
Two scenarios
1. Later on in the video, they claim that there hasn't really been any sort of journey by humans into outer space. And if we follow this train of thought then this can't be used as a point to support their theory as everything in that picture should be fake in the first place.
2. They claim all outer space programs are staged here on Earth and also say that NASA has always believed the Earth to be spherical. Now if this is also true and the moon landing was staged, why will NASA use a flat surface instead of a spherical one and go through the trouble of manipulating the picture into removing the flat part?
P.S The supposed edited part isn't even fully flat.
Sunrise and Sunset
For this point, I'm sorry to say they kinda shamed themselves here. This should be the most essential part where their theory should be solidified and they flunked it badly. They needed to explain clearly how its possible for it to be day in some places and night in another at the same time [on a flat Earth] and they didn't. Not only did they start spewing vague things, they also stylishly ignored completing it. 18:45 - 18:50 or so, during the explanation they stop abruptly and say "That takes a while to sink in" and quickly move into something else. Epic fail imo.
And these are just 2. I don't even want to get started on their "no such things as satellites" theory.
Last edited: