[Discussion] Televangelists

RAMENATOR

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
14,431
Reaction score
919
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

Sidenote on reference to my above post: the students are apart of the World Mission Society of Christ or something like that which was founded in Korea during the 60's. Yeah, it's one of those weird sects of the church were some random dude had visions and is seen as a prophet/god/reincarnation of Christ. Pretty sure they got kicked out of the mall after an employee asked me what they approached me about.
 

The Dreamer

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
2,202
Reaction score
177
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I don't. Lol

I was just providing an example that actually deals with matters of faith; i.e. Christianity, as opposed to the Church.

I go to a Catholic school and happen to believe myself that Christ came to abolish the Old Covenant and usher in a new one. That being said, the actions of Jesus are our greatest example of how to act and live our lives. Being loving, accepting, and willing to associate with the downtrodden (since, of course, Jesus dined with Gentiles and touched lepers) is the way to live.

Then I apologise for my assumption. You got me a bit confused though. Are you a Christian or not? Your posts tend to be vague.
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

And do you not think politics in the usa is also a joke? Wherever money is to be made, there will always be people to take advantage of something that is otherwise good.

Btw, you haven't made much of a case for yourself even though as a Christian myself, I agree with the basic premise of the thread: a lot of what you see/hear on television from 'televangelists' is a money grab. Tell people what they want to hear, and they will give you money. Same thing with politics among other things.

I agree that politics in the US is a joke. Didn't you see my Elizabeth Warren thread? Lol.

Anyway, I proved my case. This mainstream Christianity(televangelist in general) are just money grabbers. It's ridiculous. Churches will have some extravagant building then have the nerve to ask for more. Why do you need a mansion to praise God? Why do you need a 65 million dollar jet to spread your religion? Oh... Because God told him to. :rolleyes:

[video=youtube;HcT7cKr3hCw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcT7cKr3hCw[/video]

I don't. Lol

I was just providing an example that actually deals with matters of faith; i.e. Christianity, as opposed to the Church.

I go to a Catholic school and happen to believe myself that Christ came to abolish the Old Covenant and usher in a new one. That being said, the actions of Jesus are our greatest example of how to act and live our lives. Being loving, accepting, and willing to associate with the downtrodden (since, of course, Jesus dined with Gentiles and touched lepers) is the way to live.

I'm glad you believe that. Now if you were to tell me that gays were the devil in disguise(Or something along the lines Lol) I'd call you a hypocrite.
 
Last edited:

The Dreamer

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
2,202
Reaction score
177
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I agree that politics in the US is a joke. Didn't you see my Elizabeth Warren thread? Lol.

Anyway, I proved my case. This mainstream Christianity(televangelist in general) are just money grabbers. It's ridiculous. Churches will have some extravagant building then have the nerve to ask for more. Why do you need a mansion to praise God? Why do you need a 65 million dollar jet to spread your religion? Oh... Because God told him to. :rolleyes:

[video=youtube;HcT7cKr3hCw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcT7cKr3hCw[/video]



I'm glad you believe that. Now if you were to tell me that gays were the devil in disguise(Or something along the lines Lol) I'd call you a hypocrite.

No christian who lives their faith will tell you that.

And since when are the money grabbers mainstream christians?
 

RAMENATOR

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
14,431
Reaction score
919
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I agree that politics in the US is a joke. Didn't you see my Elizabeth Warren thread? Lol.

Anyway, I proved my case. This mainstream Christianity(televangelist in general) are just money grabbers. It's ridiculous. Churches will have some extravagant building then have the nerve to ask for more. Why do you need a mansion to praise God? Why do you need a 65 million dollar jet to spread your religion? Oh... Because God told him to. :rolleyes:

[video=youtube;HcT7cKr3hCw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcT7cKr3hCw[/video]



I'm glad you believe that. Now if you were to tell me that gays were the devil in disguise(Or something along the lines Lol) I'd call you a hypocrite.

Fair enough, though I wouldn't go so far as to place all 'Megachurches' (churches with large buildings/complexes) as money-grabbing hypocrites. I belonged to one in Florida (who did provide their financials to the congregation if I am not mistaken), and aside from Missions or other community groups, they never really asked for money/offerings. They had drop boxes for you to give, but there wasn't a set time or announcement made about it. You either did or you didn't, and no one cared either way. The church just kept growing (and still does) and that's why they had such huge buildings and now, multiple satellite churches. The lead pastor lived in a normal size home, drove a regular car, and wore average clothing. They built a high school on campus, eventually built a restaurant, and other things to benefit the community and the church. My main issue was when the lead pastor stepped down after admitting an infidelity, but even that was handled rather well. Showed he was human too which he had mentioned all throughout the years I listened to him.

In a nut shell, I do agree that quite a few of these 'church/organizations' are abusing the 'powers' of the church, but I wouldn't judge them based on their apparent income. Some churches are huge because they simply attract a crapload of members, while others are not only attracting more members, but are making a profit off it. I have seen both sides of the coin and sadly, it is the worst ones that people hear about the most.
 

Tartarus

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Messages
4,076
Reaction score
409
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

Considering Yeshua says you can't be a slave to money and serve god, the pastor is clearly a self-aware scam artist conning gullible sheep. If you really want to criticize a religion you should attack the main principals and beliefs. Like how the ancient Israelites were actually polytheistic, didn't believe in an afterlife, or how Yahweh was actually worshiped in Edom before Israel, and didn't actually become pure monotheists until the Persians introduced it to them during the exile.
 

GhostProject

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
212
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

If money can be made off of it, then someone will exploit it. And from that exploitation will come relevance and undeserved attention. The slice of proportions is not always as it appears to be.
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

No christian who lives their faith will tell you that.

And since when are the money grabbers mainstream christians?

I'm glad you said that.

As for your second point, how do you figure it's not mainstream? It's on television. That's like saying Fox News isn't a mainstream media outlet. MSNBC either. Lol.
 

Aim64C

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
608
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I agree that politics in the US is a joke. Didn't you see my Elizabeth Warren thread? Lol.

Don't remind me.

Though I agree that Headdress is a joke.

Anyway, I proved my case. This mainstream Christianity(televangelist in general) are just money grabbers. It's ridiculous. Churches will have some extravagant building then have the nerve to ask for more. Why do you need a mansion to praise God? Why do you need a 65 million dollar jet to spread your religion? Oh... Because God told him to. :rolleyes:

You didn't prove your case.

You cited one instance of a man who is asking for money for a jet and people are giving it to him.

That isn't mainstream Christianity. Mainstream Christianity is found at the dozens of local churches dotted across many towns in the midwest and south.

Now, as someone who has been privy to Church politics - I can tell you exactly how churches end up with extravagant buildings and not enough money for mission trips.

When donors give money, legally, they can mark it for certain funds. They set up trusts that can only be used in certain ways. This is often in the case of wealthy people who pass away or just retired people who like to feel like they are important.

These often represent relatively few members of the congregation - some of them are "founders" of that particular church, others are/were relative big-wigs. Either way - the money they set up in trusts can only be used in certain ways. Others who are still living often like to make pledges to donate ever how many thousand dollars if things are done their way.

Example - when my family moved into a new town and became members of a church, there was an electrically induced (due to dehumidifiers) fire in the sanctuary. My father, having come from a church where he was one of the architects for the sanctuary built there, ended up on the building committee (because we are a denomination that forms committees for everything). While not a massive donor in terms of money (he had us kids and all) - the man had immense talent and I could see the influence of his design decisions (he was a practical and functional person - not a frilly or traditionalist person).

Anyway - there wasn't too much trouble until it came to the issue of the Organ. Oh. Dear heavens. So-and-so was threatening to leave the church and take his/her donations with her if there wasn't a genuine pipe organ installed to replace the old one. Not only are 'real' pipe organs insanely expensive, but they are also high-maintenance. Not to mention - we didn't even have a person in the congregation who knew how to play an organ (the one we did have died - which is morbidly hilarious).

The argument was that we could get an electric organ - which, for all intents and purposes, sounds like a real organ - has a wider range of things that can be done with it, and doesn't require temperature and humidity stability to keep its tune and state of repair.

Before long, several of the larger donors had taken their time to voice that they were in strong support of a real pipe organ.

I can see my father literally doing a face-desk in the meetings. Even -if- it were so that the donors would fully fund the organ and its maintenance; he disagreed with the policy of making decisions based on chasing donations and argued that if you made decisions based on spiritual guidance, God would provide in the long run. He saw the old pipe organ as a needlessly complicated expense to strap the congregation with and the fire as being an opportunity to get out from under such trappings rather than saddling a future congregation with things they neither desired nor truly appreciated.

Some argued that the pipe organ would attract some media attention and therefor membership - but... really... who goes to church over what type of ****ing organ they use?

I shit you, not - they formed an "organ committee" that met for nearly a year after the sanctuary was built before determining what to get.

Anyway - they got the damned pipe organ.

There was some initial pomp and flare over a new pipe organ being installed. Some notable regional organist came in from Kansas City (if I remember correctly) and performed. That lasted a weekend.

It took them a year to find anyone who really knew how to play. Half the people who wanted the damned thing in the first place were dead by then (I'm being facetious, there - I don't think there were really that many people who died in that time span), and then they were having issues with it because they couldn't maintain the humidity levels for the pipes.

It's kind of poetic justice, in a way. When you chase donations - that is what happens. The church ends up purchasing things for the sake of a few members' desire to have influence and is left with extravagant things that they have to beg and plead for families to donate to in order to maintain.

Then, it's like pulling teeth to get mission trips or local community charity projects started - especially when you appease traditionalists who just like having someplace to be on Sunday mornings.

I'm glad you believe that. Now if you were to tell me that gays were the devil in disguise(Or something along the lines Lol) I'd call you a hypocrite.

Gays are experiencing a neurological condition induced by developmental factors to include personal decisions. This condition is reversible in voluntary individuals and can be considered a disorder depending upon the goals of the individual.

I'm of the opinion it is a disorder and classifies as a sin. That said - there are sins that are not for humans to act in judgment upon. John 8 is very clear in this regard.

Likewise - I do not believe that all sin is irreconcilable even after death. There are arguments on both side of it - but I have difficulty envisioning a God who passes down judgment. I see God's justice as being more emergent from the nature of consequences. People who can't find it in themselves to forgive others will find themselves alone in the empty halls of the kingdom of their perfection. People who can't find it in themselves to discern between sin and virtue will forever suffer the consequences of poor decisions and harmful affiliations.

I actually believe we are already in Heaven - or the "Kingdom of Heaven." It is simply the fact that we believe we are capable of envisioning perfection that causes us to create hell for ourselves. The 'trick' to "on Earth as it is in Heaven" is to stop believing the two are separate entities and treat the experience as if it is Heaven.

This abridged episode of Twilight Zone's "A Nice Place to Visit" makes the case of what I envision our concept of a "perfect" world to be like:

[video=youtube;77ueTRaYTwg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ueTRaYTwg[/video]

Our concept of a "perfect" world is actually a sort of hell.

Because we have limited perspective and limited intellectual resources - our view of "how we would do it" is fundamentally flawed. Our idea of "if the world were perfect" is based upon the unfounded assumption that it is flawed.

When we attempt to usurp the experience and forces that govern our world - we are, in effect, rebelling against the one who created it. Within a biblical context - this is service to the devil. Within a philosophical context, we are attempting to control things fundamentally beyond our control and the laws of nature will not be trifled with.

That doesn't mean we can't work within the mechanics of the universe to improve our lives - but it is when we begin to believe that we as individuals can 'fix' something that isn't broken that we run into problems.

The "kingdom of heaven" is a world where we work freely within the laws of the universe to enrich our experience of life - from being able to travel and explore to overcoming injury and disease. Since we are only barely grasping the laws of the universe - we can only glimpse at what might be the full glory of that "kingdom." But it can only exist in areas where people do not seek dominion over each other - do not see the gift of free will as a mistake that need be rectified.

Of course, I've gone from explaining church politics to preaching. So - you know how that goes.
 

The Dreamer

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
2,202
Reaction score
177
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I'm glad you said that.

As for your second point, how do you figure it's not mainstream? It's on television. That's like saying Fox News isn't a mainstream media outlet. MSNBC either. Lol.

Most things the media says is just an attention grabber with a tiny bit of truth in it so that people don't barge in the studio and break some bones. On a serious side tough, its not about the big bad TV. What you showed here was people abusing the power they have. A typical thing in everything. In my opinion there's no mainstream Christianity. There are only main stream Christians. And even that is not a good term because mainstream would mean the most common. That my friend, is subjective from one place to another.
 

Callypigia

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
2,945
Reaction score
403
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

It is also mainstream to mock Christianity. It does not adhere to liberal beliefs, which predominately control the media and influence public opinion. People mock Christians for being sheep, blindly supporting ideologies, practices, and policies set by religious leaders, but it's no different than being mindlessly manipulated by media and public opinion. Public opinion is a trend. It will change and people who follow it will look like fools to future generations, just as those now look down on past generations' concepts of morality and ethics.

As for this particular case, there will always be someone who uses a position of power to manipulate and coerce money out of people. Christianity is an easy target because it is so large, but it isn't the religion's fault, it's the individual. Christians also raise money to feed hungry, house homeless, and give respite to indigent across the globe. Politicians' need to be under the same scrutiny. An example that comes to mind is Al Gore, a person who became an eco-champion and environmental rights leader. He has raised millions of dollars in his efforts to save the environment which have funneled into his mansion and private jet.
 

ZK

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
16,237
Reaction score
794
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

Don't remind me.

Though I agree that Headdress is a joke.



You didn't prove your case.

You cited one instance of a man who is asking for money for a jet and people are giving it to him.

That isn't mainstream Christianity. Mainstream Christianity is found at the dozens of local churches dotted across many towns in the midwest and south.

Now, as someone who has been privy to Church politics - I can tell you exactly how churches end up with extravagant buildings and not enough money for mission trips.

When donors give money, legally, they can mark it for certain funds. They set up trusts that can only be used in certain ways. This is often in the case of wealthy people who pass away or just retired people who like to feel like they are important.

These often represent relatively few members of the congregation - some of them are "founders" of that particular church, others are/were relative big-wigs. Either way - the money they set up in trusts can only be used in certain ways. Others who are still living often like to make pledges to donate ever how many thousand dollars if things are done their way.

Example - when my family moved into a new town and became members of a church, there was an electrically induced (due to dehumidifiers) fire in the sanctuary. My father, having come from a church where he was one of the architects for the sanctuary built there, ended up on the building committee (because we are a denomination that forms committees for everything). While not a massive donor in terms of money (he had us kids and all) - the man had immense talent and I could see the influence of his design decisions (he was a practical and functional person - not a frilly or traditionalist person).

Anyway - there wasn't too much trouble until it came to the issue of the Organ. Oh. Dear heavens. So-and-so was threatening to leave the church and take his/her donations with her if there wasn't a genuine pipe organ installed to replace the old one. Not only are 'real' pipe organs insanely expensive, but they are also high-maintenance. Not to mention - we didn't even have a person in the congregation who knew how to play an organ (the one we did have died - which is morbidly hilarious).

The argument was that we could get an electric organ - which, for all intents and purposes, sounds like a real organ - has a wider range of things that can be done with it, and doesn't require temperature and humidity stability to keep its tune and state of repair.

Before long, several of the larger donors had taken their time to voice that they were in strong support of a real pipe organ.

I can see my father literally doing a face-desk in the meetings. Even -if- it were so that the donors would fully fund the organ and its maintenance; he disagreed with the policy of making decisions based on chasing donations and argued that if you made decisions based on spiritual guidance, God would provide in the long run. He saw the old pipe organ as a needlessly complicated expense to strap the congregation with and the fire as being an opportunity to get out from under such trappings rather than saddling a future congregation with things they neither desired nor truly appreciated.

Some argued that the pipe organ would attract some media attention and therefor membership - but... really... who goes to church over what type of ****ing organ they use?

I shit you, not - they formed an "organ committee" that met for nearly a year after the sanctuary was built before determining what to get.

Anyway - they got the damned pipe organ.

There was some initial pomp and flare over a new pipe organ being installed. Some notable regional organist came in from Kansas City (if I remember correctly) and performed. That lasted a weekend.

It took them a year to find anyone who really knew how to play. Half the people who wanted the damned thing in the first place were dead by then (I'm being facetious, there - I don't think there were really that many people who died in that time span), and then they were having issues with it because they couldn't maintain the humidity levels for the pipes.

It's kind of poetic justice, in a way. When you chase donations - that is what happens. The church ends up purchasing things for the sake of a few members' desire to have influence and is left with extravagant things that they have to beg and plead for families to donate to in order to maintain.

Then, it's like pulling teeth to get mission trips or local community charity projects started - especially when you appease traditionalists who just like having someplace to be on Sunday mornings.



Gays are experiencing a neurological condition induced by developmental factors to include personal decisions. This condition is reversible in voluntary individuals and can be considered a disorder depending upon the goals of the individual.

I'm of the opinion it is a disorder and classifies as a sin. That said - there are sins that are not for humans to act in judgment upon. John 8 is very clear in this regard.

Likewise - I do not believe that all sin is irreconcilable even after death. There are arguments on both side of it - but I have difficulty envisioning a God who passes down judgment. I see God's justice as being more emergent from the nature of consequences. People who can't find it in themselves to forgive others will find themselves alone in the empty halls of the kingdom of their perfection. People who can't find it in themselves to discern between sin and virtue will forever suffer the consequences of poor decisions and harmful affiliations.

I actually believe we are already in Heaven - or the "Kingdom of Heaven." It is simply the fact that we believe we are capable of envisioning perfection that causes us to create hell for ourselves. The 'trick' to "on Earth as it is in Heaven" is to stop believing the two are separate entities and treat the experience as if it is Heaven.

This abridged episode of Twilight Zone's "A Nice Place to Visit" makes the case of what I envision our concept of a "perfect" world to be like:

[video=youtube;77ueTRaYTwg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ueTRaYTwg[/video]

Our concept of a "perfect" world is actually a sort of hell.

Because we have limited perspective and limited intellectual resources - our view of "how we would do it" is fundamentally flawed. Our idea of "if the world were perfect" is based upon the unfounded assumption that it is flawed.

When we attempt to usurp the experience and forces that govern our world - we are, in effect, rebelling against the one who created it. Within a biblical context - this is service to the devil. Within a philosophical context, we are attempting to control things fundamentally beyond our control and the laws of nature will not be trifled with.

That doesn't mean we can't work within the mechanics of the universe to improve our lives - but it is when we begin to believe that we as individuals can 'fix' something that isn't broken that we run into problems.

The "kingdom of heaven" is a world where we work freely within the laws of the universe to enrich our experience of life - from being able to travel and explore to overcoming injury and disease. Since we are only barely grasping the laws of the universe - we can only glimpse at what might be the full glory of that "kingdom." But it can only exist in areas where people do not seek dominion over each other - do not see the gift of free will as a mistake that need be rectified.

Of course, I've gone from explaining church politics to preaching. So - you know how that goes.

I bet you think Obama is a Socialist, too.
 

Aim64C

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
608
Re: Why I think mainstream Christianity is a joke.

I bet you think Obama is a Socialist, too.

First and foremost, Obama is a Narcissist.

When you give the Queen of England an iPod with your speeches loaded onto it as a birthday present - you've got a ****ing problem.

Yes. Obama did this:



Thus, Obama's entire sociological and economic policies boil down to: "ME."

Obama strongly supports the government operating social programs. Government provided healthcare, government provided insurance, government housing, etc.

Obama also believes he knows better than the rest of the world and is required to act upon his superiority (thus narcissism). This means that he is for being able to control employer wages and privately held assets. It isn't so much that he is a communist or socialist as much as he simply believes that these things can be better utilized by himself and the people of his ideology.

This, currently, manifests itself in the form of Fascism - the government ownership/merger with business. All business is essentially of and for the benefit of the State. For Obama - the State is responsible for maintaining the people who functionally service the ideas of those in power within the government.

IE - the government owns business to direct the efforts of the people toward projects deemed important by the intellectuals who rule over the government.

Thus, Obama is most aligned with the policies and ideologies of Stalinism and Maoism.

One could say he is similar in concept to Nazism - but this is only with regard to his support for the New Black Panthers and the idea that blacks should establish their own nation.

Obama is not an American Nationalist and would not be considered "National Socialist" within the American frame of reference. Although, yes, Obama does support a lot of socialist programs because they give him a further degree of control - another avenue to impose his wisdom upon an ignorant public.
 
Top