Suggestion - Change to Official NB Summoning Contracts List

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bedlington

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
3,542
Reaction score
59
Hi this is just a proposing a change to one note in Calilburn (Crème Brûlée)'s post: .

It says:



3: Your summoning has to be believable and not humanoid. That means do not make things like the Olympian Gods, legendary heroes or creatures, zombies etc. Things like dragons and phoenix' (contracts already taken) are acceptable because even though they never really existed a lot of different cultures independent from each other believed that they existed. For instance you can find dragon-like creatures all over the Eurasian continent.



However I recently found ot in the last custom jutsu thread that mythical animals will not be approved.

±± All Declined ±± Don't Resubmit. No mythical animals. Hells has the dragon contract yes, but it was approved ages ago. We don't approve those anymore.

While I know that this is probably common knowledge to most experienced rpers, it should still be changed for newer rp members and so that there is no inconsistency. I'm sure this is just one of those small things that slipped under the radar as the RP has evolved - I'm just trying to be helpful.​
 

Caliburn

𝕷𝔢𝖔 𝕭𝔢𝖑𝔤𝖎𝔠𝖚𝔰
Supreme
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
20,944
Reaction score
4,197
I don't really see a reason as why. Dragons are already taken, which is stated in the rules so why did you submit it then as a contract if you knew it?

It clearly says 'believable' and by default 99% of all the so-called mythological creatures are a no-go as they are not believable. I intentionally left a very tiny gap to explain as why some people already have such a contract as otherwise people are going to complain. That doesn't take away that in essence now most mythological creatures will not be approved.

If you actually read that rule and after that still submitted a dragons contract, well then it doesn't matter how I formulate it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top