Lol you're much more stubborn than I am. You refused to admit that Burgess wasn't BB's first mate/second strongest BB Pirate even though Burgess got fodderized by Sabo. None of those guys can beat the people you listed. Seriouly, how can Law possibly beat DD when he got mid diffed by him? How can Luffy beat Jack when Luffy is at best equal to DD while Jack has been portrayed to be stronger than DD? How can Sabo beat an admiral when Fujitora was mid diffing him? How can Kuma possibly beat Mihawk, a Yonko level character, when Kuma isn't even the 2nd strongest Revolutionary?
These are possibilities regarding the situation at hand weighing the ratios between two individuals on how many times they win or lose despite the deficit number they need for the majority. And your Blackbeard case of who's the strongest or not, I used the most rational way of determining the strongest based off the number rankings.
1. So your argument on Shiliew being the strongest?
-Subjective, baseless, hold no grounds on who's actually the strongest because you have no proof.
2. Blackbeard following Whitebeards commander logic?
-Also subjective, baseless, and a huge assumption that you feel is correct without any objective reasoning whatsoever. Then we have Jack, who also has the same rank as Burguess. So know one really knows how each yonkou ranks his crew members but the most common is by number rankings.
Don't get it twisted either, your as stubborn as Riker and this section of the base is the only thing you got going for you. If I see something stupid or opinionated, I don't go out of my way to correct everyone with believes that aren't even factual. I'm not gonna repeat myself again, I'm not telling someone as stubborn as you.