Statewide Emergency! Baltimore protest turns violent!Gangs, National Guards, etc!

[Anorien16]

Yet you dodge my question show me the statics , i can careless for gangs or criminal originations in what concept are you talking about during the riot or before it? Because i understand well how about you use that ounce to show me the statics? Derrrrpppp

Statistics regarding what?

Also you didn't get the part about coherent sentences?

Because it's not an uprising against the government. It's against the police force.

By attacking Old age homes and stores? Riggght!

 

[GhostProject]

You must be registered for see links

"CHICAGO (STMW) — Four people were killed and at least 22 others — including a 13-year-old boy — have been injured in Chicago gun violence since Friday morning, police said.

The most recent fatal shooting happened Sunday afternoon in the East Garfield Park neighborhood on the West Side."

Honestly, I don't think districts like this are worth the manpower to save.

Set up a battery of M-270s and strike with ATACMS missiles set for sub-munition dispersion. The equivalent of a hand grenade placed within every square meter of a football field. It will be quick and relatively painless. Saturate the district.

Done.

Hopefully, Sharpton is there giving a speech when it goes down.

This is the worst possible "solution." Massacres at the cost of innocent lives is not a solution, it's the quickest way to further unrest and an actual civil war, not even counting that it's the most evil choice to make.

Just call in the National Guard to disperse violent actions and politicians need to do their best to pacify the situation.

 

[~WastelandSociety~]

Still better than your shitty Greece anyday. Get a job and pay us Germans our money back.

But I live in 'Merica.
And I do have a job.

Nice try kid. Not going to give you any money from here.

You won't see anything.

Try working if you want money tho. Or moving.

 

[Multiply]

By attacking Old age homes and stores? Riggght!

Do you not know the difference between a peaceful protest and a riot?

 

[Anorien16]

Do you not know the difference between a peaceful protest and a riot?

Do you? Because as far as I remember peaceful protests remains peaceful only until there are no near by incidents of violence.

 

[Multiply]

Do you? Because as far as I remember peaceful protests remains peaceful only until there are no near by incidents of violence.

People peacefully protesting are not the people rioting. How do you not see this?

[video=youtube;_rUrh_tUPQo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rUrh_tUPQo[/video]

Are you telling me these same people who are cleaning up Baltimore were rioting the night before? Are you really this stupid?

 

[RAMENATOR]

They don't get respect because they don't respect themselves. Rioting and destroying things only makes the issue worse for the ones rioting. It ends up with the good cops hesitating to take action against criminals because of the color of their skin, and bad cops having more reason to take more action than necessary to deal with 'criminals' based on the color of their skin. It simply does not make the situation better.

If I were in a 'peaceful' protest and some asshat decides to try riling people up or is spouting their mouth off, I would knock the fool out before they start some crap. If more people knew how to look for agitators and handle them on their own, riots would be a bit more infrequent.

My thought with all of this is, if ya'll hate the cops so much or are fed up with the way they handle things, why do you bother calling them? If this is how you think all cops react, why call them? Same thought I have in regards to families with a mentally ill member who has a violent episode with a weapon and winds up getting shot and killed by the police, and then they want to sue the police because they expected them to come give the person a hug, not shoot them. "Oh but they should have extra special training to deal with mental health patients." Yeah, let's forget that we as a family know the person better than anyone else and yet we expect some stranger to come in and 'talk them down or control them.' If you can't handle them when they are acting violent, why do you think the police will be any better?

The thing I find it interesting about most of these cases is that the supposed victims, all have a criminal history. They aren't innocent, first-time offenders, or actual under 18 120 pound teenagers who don't have any history of dealing with the police. They have records and should know how to act when dealt with by the police.

I will say, however, this is the only case out of all of them so far that I would have found to be out of order. Granted, the officers probably made some sort of mistake in procedure rather than purposefully intending to harm the man, but still, if they are in custody already and have asked for medical attention, then they should be checked out. Whether the officers believe the person is injured or not, they aren't doctors and should take them to a hospital. That should be standard operating procedure. And if you make a mistake, own up to it, especially that mistake injures or kills someone. Otherwise, you look guilty of more.

Regardless, the family should simply sue the department, get money, have it publicized in the news, and everyone else should just shut the F up.

 

[Kuroh]

Interesting.

You must be registered for see links

 

[~WastelandSociety~]

You must be registered for see images

 

[Anorien16]

People peacefully protesting are not the people rioting. How do you not see this?

[video=youtube;_rUrh_tUPQo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rUrh_tUPQo[/video]

Are you telling me these same people who are cleaning up Baltimore were rioting the night before? Are you really this stupid?

There were people in Germany who did not support the Nazi during WW2 ... Does that washes away the sins of the Nazi? Get real and stop trying to side track the issue ... Every time there is peaceful protests, there are rioters who loots and burns hiding behind them ... happened in Ferguson and now in Baltimore. Existence of peaceful people and people who cleaned up does not change the fact that there was barbaric attacks too.

 

[Multiply]

There were people in Germany who did not support the Nazi during WW2 ... Does that washes away the sins of the Nazi? Get real and stop trying to side track the issue ... Every time there is peaceful protests, there are rioters who loots and burns hiding behind them ... happened in Ferguson and now in Baltimore. Existence of peaceful people and people who cleaned up does not change the fact that there was barbaric attacks too.

Uhg you're grasping at straws this early? Where's Aim64c when you need him.

You're comparing the Baltimore riot with Nazi Germany. Let that sink in for a sec.

Anyway, no one is saying what the rioters did is good. I'm saying the peaceful protesters are not the rioters. They are the ones cleaning up the city after those fools tried to destroy it. What you're trying to do is the same thing Geraldo Rivera and Fox News love doing. Missing the entire point and blaming all black people for the negative riots that no one condones. You wouldn't be talking about any of this if there was no riot, but now that there's a riot it completely outshines the peaceful protests? Because of the stupidity of 50+ teens, the peaceful meaning of the protests just hours before is simply thrown out?

[video=youtube;4ZSK9viJFEg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZSK9viJFEg[/video]

Fools these days.

 

[Yubel]

When scum rule the world only more scum are born.

 

[Anorien16]

You're comparing the Baltimore riot with Nazi Germany. Let that sink in for a sec.

Your comprehension skill sucks .... If you had a thimble of sense you would have got the point: >>>>>> The presence of a peaceful people does not wash away the sins of the violent ones. <<<<<<

Anyway, no one is saying what the rioters did is good. I'm saying the peaceful protesters are not the rioters.

I have repeated this many times: Why would you even bother to mention some people who are not related to a riot (cough) in a topic dealing with rioters? Do you mention the divorce rates and domestic violence facts in marriage ceremony?

Unless there is ulterior a motive.

They are the ones cleaning up the city after those fools tried to destroy it.

I think the local people are trying to do that ... not only the protestors.

What you're trying to do is the same thing Geraldo Rivera and Fox News love doing. Missing the entire point and blaming all black people for the negative riots that no one condones.

Please quote where I specifically said that? ... If i remember my own words I blamed the ghetto people and barbarians, and acknowledged the peaceful protestors .... So unless you think all blacks are ghetto and barbarics ....

Also the Mayor Baltimore (a black Woman) was heard saying something on the lines of that the rioters needed a safe space to destroy. So someone partially condones.

You wouldn't be talking about any of this if there was no riot,

We would be debating the the peaceful protests ... even support it maybe according to evidence.

but now that there's a riot it completely outshines the peaceful protests? Because of the stupidity of 50+ teens, the peaceful meaning of the protests just hours before is simply thrown out?

Yes ... Since racism or incompetence by 10% for a single event can outshine the good done over the years by the 90% .... then why not? /Sarcasm

You are really one of these idiots .... You are too dumb to realize that people condemning rioters are not condemning the peaceful protestors, BECASUE they ARE NOT the RIOTERS. You are tieing the peaceful protestors with the rioters by bringing them up.

Fools these days.

Exactly.

PS Also you might look into stuff and see a pattern .... Aim64c was not wrong: The rioters were not local people concerned about the death of a drug dealer.

 

[Multiply]

Your comprehension skill sucks .... If you had a thimble of sense you would have got the point: >>>>>> The presence of a peaceful people does not wash away the sins of the violent ones. <<<<<<

Therein lies your problem. The violent people should not get nearly as much coverage as the peaceful ones.

I have repeated this many times: Why would you even bother to mention some people who are not related to a riot (cough) in a topic dealing with rioters? Do you mention the divorce rates and domestic violence facts in marriage ceremony?

Unless there is ulterior a motive.

I was never talking about the riots with you. I was talking about the peaceful protests when you jumped in the conversation between Aim64c and I. How you haven't realized that yet is besides me.

Please quote where I specifically said that? ... If i remember my own words I blamed the ghetto people and barbarians, and acknowledged the peaceful protestors .... So unless you think all blacks are ghetto and barbarics ....

So what you're saying is all rioters are ghetto and barbaric? Lol, please. You're an even bigger fool than I imagined you to be.

Yes ... Since racism or incompetence by 10% can outshine the good done by 90% .... why not?

Which is what is wrong with our nation.

PS Also you might look into stuff and see a pattern .. Aim64c was not wrong. The rioters were not local people.

Don't go insane on me like he does.

 

[Typhon]

Therein lies your problem. The violent people should not get nearly as much coverage as the peaceful ones.




I was never talking about the riots with you. I was talking about the peaceful protests when you jumped in the conversation between Aim64c and I. How you haven't realized that yet is besides me.



So what you're saying is all rioters are ghetto and barbaric? Lol, please. You're an even bigger fool than I imagined you to be.



Which is what is wrong with our nation.


Don't go insane on me like he does.

The people rioting are going to always get the coverage because its easier. Rioters are bad, obviously, so nobody needs to think about the issue. They cause violence and chaos, which are exciting. Peaceful protests on the other hand require us to think about the usually complex issues they're rallying against which varying shades of morality. Its people walking around with signs and chanting, kind of dull.

It would be great if the News stations focused on the issues instead of the violence, which is an issue for the police to handle, but that's not going to happen. Outside of Baltimore a 7/11 getting looted means nothing to anyone, whereas the issues of police brutality and racial bias in the justice system does.

Its unfortunate but it is what it is.

As for the riots themselves, its nothing too surprising. If you give the masses a reason to riot, they'll find a way to do it. I don't care if its a minority community fighting against racism or a bunch of Canadians angry about their team losing a hockey game. Humans are going to human.

 

[Anorien16]

Therein lies your problem. The violent people should not get nearly as much coverage as the peaceful ones.

So what? Peaceful movements needs thought and while danger evokes reaction ... its quite natural.

I was never talking about the riots with you. I was talking about the peaceful protests when you jumped in the conversation between Aim64c and I. How you haven't realized that yet is besides me.

Look at the thread title and OP .... it was discussing the unruly people when you bought in the entirely unrelated people into the topic.

So what you're saying is all rioters are ghetto and barbaric? Lol, please. You're an even bigger fool than I imagined you to be.

OMG ... I am so sorry that I did not realize that people who burn down property and loot stores are civilized, sensible, educated and financially stable.

Which is what is wrong with our nation.

Whats wrong with your freaking nation is that most of them has no sense and knows less how to behave.

Don't go insane on me like he does.

And you keep weaseling and ignoring the points brought up.

 

[Multiply]

Look at the thread title and OP .... it was discussing the unruly people when you bought in the entirely unrelated people into the topic.

You still haven't understood when I flat out said it to you. Let me tell you again. I was not talking about the riots in this thread. I was talking about the peaceful protests with Aim64c before you jumped into the conversation. My initial posts had nothing to do with the riots Lol. Go back and read the thread.

OMG ... I am so sorry that I did not realize that people who burn down property and loot stores are civilized, sensible, educated and financially stable.

You must be registered for see images

You're digging your own hole here. What does 'ghetto-ness' have to do with education and financial stability? Are you even from the US? If you knew where 'ghetto-ness' was rooted in our society, you would see how false a statement that is.

Whats wrong with your freaking nation is that most of them has no sense and knows less how to behave.

Another racist comment? What do you mean by "them".

And you keep weaseling and ignoring the points brought up.

How do you figure?

 

[Anorien16]

You still haven't understood when I flat out said it to you. Let me tell you again. I was not talking about the riots in this thread. I was talking about the peaceful protests with Aim64c before you jumped into the conversation. My initial posts had nothing to do with the riots Lol. Go back and read the thread.

Hope you finally get the point: that Peaceful faction has nothing to do with rioters *cough* and thus should not be brought into discussion.

You're digging your own hole here. What does 'ghetto-ness' have to do with education and financial stability? Are you even from the US? If you knew where 'ghetto-ness' was rooted in our society, you would see how false a statement that is.

Does any of these actually change the fact that only certain type of people usually riot, burn and loot mindlessly?

Another racist comment? What do you mean by "them".

"Whats wrong with your freaking nation is that most of them has no sense and knows less how to behave."

Read the sentence again ... Oh one with the superb brain capacity. Then tell me if a 'nation' is a 'race' and thus if I am being racist.

 

[Multiply]

Hope you finally get the point: that Peaceful faction has nothing to do with rioters *cough* and thus should not be brought into discussion.

Considering my initial discussion had nothing to do with you, that's really doesn't concern you right? Lol

Does any of these actually change the fact that only certain type of people usually riot, burn and loot mindlessly?

You really need to stop saying things like this. Makes you seem like a right wing nut or a tea bagger.

"Whats wrong with your freaking nation is that most of them has no sense and knows less how to behave."

Read the sentence again ... Oh one with the superb brain capacity. Then tell me if a 'nation' is a 'race' and thus if I am being racist.

It was a joke based on the 'them' you used. Relax.

 

[Anorien16]

Considering my initial discussion had nothing to do with you, that's really doesn't concern you right? Lol

That does not mean you would be allowed to derail the topic in another direction.

You really need to stop saying things like this. Makes you seem like a right wing nut or a tea bagger.

Again skating away from the point using a personal attack based on political correctness ... typical. You cant even face the facts that certain type of people act in certain ways.

It was a joke based on the 'them' you used. Relax.

Or your Racist Card Trigger gave a false positive. Relax.