spartans vs knights

uchiahjay

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
650
Reaction score
74
First we have king authur, ruler of england and said to be their greatest king, he even went as far as defeating a dragon, his myth is on a fiction level, now i aint refering to that fruit loop, on that merlin show, im talking about the real badass legend, vs, leuronitas, ruler of sparta, rumoured to have killed over 150000 men with only 300, now if their armies battled each other who do you think would win, and if the battle came down to king of england vs king of sparta who do you think would be victorious. now idk, but to me the edge goes to the dude who slayed a dragon and has a magical sword, but army on army, the edge goes to the rough and tough spartans, what do you think?
 

ITACHIUCHIA101

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
4,890
Reaction score
209
ehh idk the times seem totally different hard to tell
 

Kettei

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
674
Spartans IMO
 

markdabomb22

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,756
Reaction score
677
Army vs Army Spartans FTW in a 1V1 king vs king i give this to king Authur
 

Anorien16

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
497
See Dealiest Warriors . . . the Spartans came out on the top on factual value basis.
 

Saiyan Prince Vegeta

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
934
Reaction score
93
NarutoBase turned into "The Deadliest Warrior".

But I'd say Spartans, they trained there kids to be killing machines before they were teenagers, and made them ruthless.
 

ANIM317

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
130
Reaction score
6
Sparans They focused mostly on military forces and known to be ruthless besides king leonitas is a beastt
 

ShishaMastah420

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
4,814
Reaction score
401
Spartans because they ain't restricted by bulky armor...
 

Unleashed26

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2010
Messages
254
Reaction score
7
spartans FTW. each spartan was said to be the equivalent of 200 other soldiers. one on one leonidas would win because he was the non-political king of sparta, so pretty much the warrior king
 

ackeem1992

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
4,209
Reaction score
185
these to are centuries apart, and i think (i'm not sure) king athur's army would have better armors and stronger swords considering his era was more recent, but the spartans were very skilled fighters, their tactical combinations along with their brute force was key to slaying all those Persians, Leonidas was fearless so say the spartans.
 

UzumakiNIN

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
117
Reaction score
14
ok ok ok its spelled LEONIDAS!!!! And army v army Spartans, king v king Arthur, Leonidas has the superior training by far, but he was in the bronze age so he uses bronze based weapons and using those weapons against steel long swords would be the only reaon for a lose. but with armies the average British soldier is not super epic monster trained like Spartans just trained. and do the Spartans get get kratos or Master Chief? if so epic Spartan win!
 

Shinobi Train

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
6,011
Reaction score
399
Well, the Spartans were warriors from birth, fighting was in their blood. I'm sure we also remember the 300, so obviously their tough.

Knights were also chosen to be warriors due to their capabilities. They were highly trained and spent an equal amount of time practicing pretty much. However, in such a battle, it would come down to who could do the most damage to the enemy without receiving much in return.

The Spartans did use some great techniques, but other than their shields, they didn't have much protection when compared to a Knight. In a one on one battle, the obvious winner would be the knight. In a large scale battle, one has to take in all the weapons that were able to be used. For example, catapults would destroy the Spartans phalanx, rendering their greatest advantage useless. In closer combat, the Knights would be able to beat on their shields like drums using maces and such. Also, if crossbows are considered, then the battle is over before it begins.

Keep in mind that a spear isn't going to do much damage against a full set of armor. If a Knight merely jumped on a Spartan, they be crushed...of course, the Knight wouldn't be able to get back up either, but at least the line is now broken. xd

Honestly, I think the Spartans would be toast...mobility doesn't beat strength. I know we all think that the big, tough guy can be taken down if someone just moves fast enough...I'm here to tell you that the fastest ninja who ever lived isn't able to defeat a burly Viking no matter how hard you wish for it. In the end, all the Viking has to do is get a hold of them and it's over. Same with Spartans; once a Knight comes knocking, the game is over. ;)
 
Top