Some more cop BS.

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
We purge 'em, that's what.
That course of action will spiral into an ethnic cleansing that the welfare blacks will lose.

European politics begets European solutions to problems.

There is a conspiracy against minorities though. Racial profiling is a real issue amongst police forces.
As for the solution; I think the black community needs to start speaking proper english, lower their loud voices, and start supporting each other like the Chinese. That won't stop the fascist pig cops from harrassing them but it will help on the long run.
[video=youtube;uj0mtxXEGE8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8[/video]

I think the video echoes your sentiments to some degree.

Profiling is a reality of any law enforcement agency. You simply aren't going to get away from profiling.

Why? Because it works.

The most practical solution is to put back into place the restraints upon legislators that existed in the form of Constitutions. The more shit they implement to 'socially engineer' our society, the more police are both on the hook for enforcing and the more rules they can use to argue probable cause.

But what you don't hear about very often is this:



"Police said they initially fired a “less lethal round” at McCarroll in a failed attempt to disarm him after he began walking towards officers. It was then, police said, that McCarroll charged at the officers.

Police said McCarroll’s mother told them her son had been talking about going on a “journey” and a “mission,” while also making references to a “black revolution.”

“Officers could see the subject through the front window of the residence, walking around the inside of the house with several knives and a Samurai sword,” police said in a statement.

Police said McCarroll died at the scene, despite efforts from a medic to revive him. "


Black Lives Matter protested against the police, here.

There is no winning. They are part of that "Black Revolution" - like the above person I quoted was saying with "Purge them." Perhaps he was being sarcastic - but I've seen people with that mentality before.

There are dark times ahead for America as a group that has been lured by politicians and vile men to believe they have no future begins a war to overthrow the government in their areas. That is the goal of "Black Lives Matter." The goal is to essentially become a virtual palestinian state that is above reproach. They can kill the ever living shit out of each other and bomb supermarkets - but never be attacked without triggering "racism."

People like myself will just call their bluff and use area of effect weaponry to destroy them by the thousand - Everyone is effectively guilty by association, even if that has some less than ideal implications.

You aren't going to win by throwing gifts at them - nothing will ever be enough. No amount of concessions or understanding will convince those who have subscribed to black liberation theology. You won't ever be able to 'drive out' the evil influence, either. It will persist so long as the self-isolating culture exists for it to feed off of.

Which is precisely why they are being used in this way. The only way to preserve the nation it takes root in is to resort to genocide - that - or a damn near miraculous change of perspective and philosophy within the affected culture.

However, so long as they are paid through the opaque processes of government to breed in fatherless environments - they will be effective pawns to subvert the laws and prosperity of America. They will be able to perpetually isolate themselves from the rest of a functioning society and thereby never be released from the predators that have claimed their minds.



"A Detroit mother calls police, panicked when her 9-year-old son doesn't return home.

It turns out he wasn't exactly missing, he was actually under arrest accused of committing a home invasion.

Stephanie Horton was in a state of panic Wednesday night when her 9 -year-old son Kamian Strawder was missing. The third-grader had been expelled from Palmer Park Prep earlier in the week and he had nowhere to be but at their Detroit home on Appoline."




"The shooting was reported at about 8 p.m. at a school-sanctioned sorority and fraternity cookout event, university President Harry L. Williams said in a statement.

Early Sunday morning, shots rang out a second time on campus, this time in the parking lot at the University Courtyard, a student housing complex. No one was injured in the second incident.

At about 1:30 a.m. school officials sent out an alert notifying students that shots were fired at 1:15 a.m. and also released a description of a suspect.

Police were looking for a black man with short dreadlocks, 5-feet-9 to 5-feet-11 and wearing a tan and blue long sleeve T-shirt and white sneakers, according to the alert. The suspect was driving a dark colored 4-door vehicle."




"At least 18 people have been shot, two fatally, in shootings across the city's Northwest, West and South sides since Friday morning."

This is nearly every weekend in Chicago.

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
That course of action will spiral into an ethnic cleansing that the welfare blacks will lose.

European politics begets European solutions to problems.



[video=youtube;uj0mtxXEGE8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8[/video]

I think the video echoes your sentiments to some degree.

Profiling is a reality of any law enforcement agency. You simply aren't going to get away from profiling.

Why? Because it works.

The most practical solution is to put back into place the restraints upon legislators that existed in the form of Constitutions. The more shit they implement to 'socially engineer' our society, the more police are both on the hook for enforcing and the more rules they can use to argue probable cause.

But what you don't hear about very often is this:



"Police said they initially fired a “less lethal round” at McCarroll in a failed attempt to disarm him after he began walking towards officers. It was then, police said, that McCarroll charged at the officers.

Police said McCarroll’s mother told them her son had been talking about going on a “journey” and a “mission,” while also making references to a “black revolution.”

“Officers could see the subject through the front window of the residence, walking around the inside of the house with several knives and a Samurai sword,” police said in a statement.

Police said McCarroll died at the scene, despite efforts from a medic to revive him. "


Black Lives Matter protested against the police, here.

There is no winning. They are part of that "Black Revolution" - like the above person I quoted was saying with "Purge them." Perhaps he was being sarcastic - but I've seen people with that mentality before.

There are dark times ahead for America as a group that has been lured by politicians and vile men to believe they have no future begins a war to overthrow the government in their areas. That is the goal of "Black Lives Matter." The goal is to essentially become a virtual palestinian state that is above reproach. They can kill the ever living shit out of each other and bomb supermarkets - but never be attacked without triggering "racism."

People like myself will just call their bluff and use area of effect weaponry to destroy them by the thousand - Everyone is effectively guilty by association, even if that has some less than ideal implications.

You aren't going to win by throwing gifts at them - nothing will ever be enough. No amount of concessions or understanding will convince those who have subscribed to black liberation theology. You won't ever be able to 'drive out' the evil influence, either. It will persist so long as the self-isolating culture exists for it to feed off of.

Which is precisely why they are being used in this way. The only way to preserve the nation it takes root in is to resort to genocide - that - or a damn near miraculous change of perspective and philosophy within the affected culture.

However, so long as they are paid through the opaque processes of government to breed in fatherless environments - they will be effective pawns to subvert the laws and prosperity of America. They will be able to perpetually isolate themselves from the rest of a functioning society and thereby never be released from the predators that have claimed their minds.



"A Detroit mother calls police, panicked when her 9-year-old son doesn't return home.

It turns out he wasn't exactly missing, he was actually under arrest accused of committing a home invasion.

Stephanie Horton was in a state of panic Wednesday night when her 9 -year-old son Kamian Strawder was missing. The third-grader had been expelled from Palmer Park Prep earlier in the week and he had nowhere to be but at their Detroit home on Appoline."




"The shooting was reported at about 8 p.m. at a school-sanctioned sorority and fraternity cookout event, university President Harry L. Williams said in a statement.

Early Sunday morning, shots rang out a second time on campus, this time in the parking lot at the University Courtyard, a student housing complex. No one was injured in the second incident.

At about 1:30 a.m. school officials sent out an alert notifying students that shots were fired at 1:15 a.m. and also released a description of a suspect.

Police were looking for a black man with short dreadlocks, 5-feet-9 to 5-feet-11 and wearing a tan and blue long sleeve T-shirt and white sneakers, according to the alert. The suspect was driving a dark colored 4-door vehicle."




"At least 18 people have been shot, two fatally, in shootings across the city's Northwest, West and South sides since Friday morning."

This is nearly every weekend in Chicago.

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images
No one said you were wrong. Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Boroughs in NYC, and several cities in California need to be reformed. It's ridiculous how much black on black crime there is. However, just because there is black on black crime, that does not mean you can disregard racial profiling deaths.
 

YowYan

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
15,124
Kin
1,244💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
That course of action will spiral into an ethnic cleansing that the welfare blacks will lose.

European politics begets European solutions to problems.



[video=youtube;uj0mtxXEGE8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8[/video]

I think the video echoes your sentiments to some degree.

Profiling is a reality of any law enforcement agency. You simply aren't going to get away from profiling.

Why? Because it works.

The most practical solution is to put back into place the restraints upon legislators that existed in the form of Constitutions. The more shit they implement to 'socially engineer' our society, the more police are both on the hook for enforcing and the more rules they can use to argue probable cause.

But what you don't hear about very often is this:



"Police said they initially fired a “less lethal round” at McCarroll in a failed attempt to disarm him after he began walking towards officers. It was then, police said, that McCarroll charged at the officers.

Police said McCarroll’s mother told them her son had been talking about going on a “journey” and a “mission,” while also making references to a “black revolution.”

“Officers could see the subject through the front window of the residence, walking around the inside of the house with several knives and a Samurai sword,” police said in a statement.

Police said McCarroll died at the scene, despite efforts from a medic to revive him. "


Black Lives Matter protested against the police, here.

There is no winning. They are part of that "Black Revolution" - like the above person I quoted was saying with "Purge them." Perhaps he was being sarcastic - but I've seen people with that mentality before.

There are dark times ahead for America as a group that has been lured by politicians and vile men to believe they have no future begins a war to overthrow the government in their areas. That is the goal of "Black Lives Matter." The goal is to essentially become a virtual palestinian state that is above reproach. They can kill the ever living shit out of each other and bomb supermarkets - but never be attacked without triggering "racism."

People like myself will just call their bluff and use area of effect weaponry to destroy them by the thousand - Everyone is effectively guilty by association, even if that has some less than ideal implications.

You aren't going to win by throwing gifts at them - nothing will ever be enough. No amount of concessions or understanding will convince those who have subscribed to black liberation theology. You won't ever be able to 'drive out' the evil influence, either. It will persist so long as the self-isolating culture exists for it to feed off of.

Which is precisely why they are being used in this way. The only way to preserve the nation it takes root in is to resort to genocide - that - or a damn near miraculous change of perspective and philosophy within the affected culture.

However, so long as they are paid through the opaque processes of government to breed in fatherless environments - they will be effective pawns to subvert the laws and prosperity of America. They will be able to perpetually isolate themselves from the rest of a functioning society and thereby never be released from the predators that have claimed their minds.



"A Detroit mother calls police, panicked when her 9-year-old son doesn't return home.

It turns out he wasn't exactly missing, he was actually under arrest accused of committing a home invasion.

Stephanie Horton was in a state of panic Wednesday night when her 9 -year-old son Kamian Strawder was missing. The third-grader had been expelled from Palmer Park Prep earlier in the week and he had nowhere to be but at their Detroit home on Appoline."




"The shooting was reported at about 8 p.m. at a school-sanctioned sorority and fraternity cookout event, university President Harry L. Williams said in a statement.

Early Sunday morning, shots rang out a second time on campus, this time in the parking lot at the University Courtyard, a student housing complex. No one was injured in the second incident.

At about 1:30 a.m. school officials sent out an alert notifying students that shots were fired at 1:15 a.m. and also released a description of a suspect.

Police were looking for a black man with short dreadlocks, 5-feet-9 to 5-feet-11 and wearing a tan and blue long sleeve T-shirt and white sneakers, according to the alert. The suspect was driving a dark colored 4-door vehicle."




"At least 18 people have been shot, two fatally, in shootings across the city's Northwest, West and South sides since Friday morning."

This is nearly every weekend in Chicago.

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images
I don't know about that video, Aim. Things are more complicated and ''instigated'' as it's a socio-economic issue. But fact remains that the black community could have been less chaotic if they were to be like, for example; the Chinese community. It comes from both sides. In that sense. I agree with this image of yours:
You must be registered for see images


As for the ''Black lives matter''; I think that's a stupid name for a human rights organization. A typical mistake of categorizing their own kind which isolates them from other communities. Fascist u.s.a.'s domestic policies tyrannize everyone. Blacks more often but, in the end it affects all citizens. So they should stop categorizing themselves, imo and just show as much evidence they can of racial profiling without screaming the victim card.

On another note: You haven't shown us the true side of racial profiling. You haven't shown us how cops deliberately approach minorites on the streets and provoke tension and then act as if the pedestrian is being hostile so they have an excuse to arrest the person. Yes, the black community can be loud and vulgar in my opinion but fascist police cops are a pandemic and a bigger problem at that.
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
No one said you were wrong. Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Boroughs in NYC, and several cities in California need to be reformed. It's ridiculous how much black on black crime there is. However, just because there is black on black crime, that does not mean you can disregard racial profiling deaths.
How do we know what deaths are rooted in racial profiling?

What would 'not disregarding' racial profiling-related deaths look like? Under what set of actions may we properly regard incidents of racial profiling induced fatality?

If those involve prosecution, how does one mount an effective defense against a 'crime' for which there is only circumstantial evidence?

Remember when we had our little discussion about Obama and his alleged intent?

It's all conjecture and wild conspiracy theories that I killed a man rather than fought him to the ground because of a racial difference.

Further - what is the practical likelihood of these policies being equally applied? Do you really think a black police officer shooting a white suspect would be investigated as thoroughly when there is literally zero media coverage of such incidents? Even if racial -prejudice- (not just profiling) was involved, where would the equal protection under the law kick in for whites?

I don't know about that video, Aim. Things are more complicated and ''instigated'' as it's a socio-economic issue. But fact remains that the black community could have been less chaotic if they were to be like, for example; the Chinese community. It comes from both sides. In that sense. I agree with this image of yours:
It's not a socio-economic issue.

It's a culture issue. Culture influences socio-economics. There is no economic solution to the problem that does not first involve a change of cultural perspective enabling the affected individuals to achieve.



I can't highlight, enough, what Sowell says beginning at 11:46

"It means that people have discriminated against other people wherever they have had the power to do it almost everywhere in the world and in almost every period of history. Some groups have been held back by this, and some groups it seems to make no difference whatever. Insofar for example as you have entrepreneurial skills the fact that people didn't hire Jews in the nineteenth century didn't stop Jews from hiring each other and setting up- and dominating such industries as the garment industry or the beginning of the great Hollywood movie studios and other areas of the economy. It is the skills that are crucial and not the fact that people are willing or unwilling to hire you. Even groups that have a great animosity towards other groups will never the less hire members of those groups with skills in the long run if there are enough of them to make it worth their while."

As for the ''Black lives matter''; I think that's a stupid name for a human rights organization. A typical mistake of categorizing their own kind which isolates them from other communities. Fascist u.s.a.'s domestic policies tyrannize everyone. Blacks more often but, in the end it affects all citizens. So they should stop categorizing themselves, imo and just show as much evidence they can of racial profiling without screaming the victim card.
It's no mistake that they named themselves black lives matter.







To understand what is going on in America, you have to understand what the end game is.

On another note: You haven't shown us the true side of racial profiling. You haven't shown us how cops deliberately approach minorites on the streets and provoke tension and then act as if the pedestrian is being hostile so they have an excuse to arrest the person. Yes, the black community can be loud and vulgar in my opinion but fascist police cops are a pandemic and a bigger problem at that.
The burden of proof lay on you for that one.

Keep in mind that what you see as intimidating is not necessarily what I see as intimidating. I'm a boy who grew up in Missouri rural and suburban areas. We shot fireworks at each other when we were bored and the sound of gunfire in the distance is taken without a flinch (people brand new to the area from places like California hit the deck when a hunter takes a shot or two at something - it's kind of comical). There's a different mentality of a self-made individual and more inherent confidence in one's own boundaries.

Of course - this is also an area where many people are still raised under the belief of: "No one makes you do anything." If someone comes up and antagonizes you with a mocking tone - and you reach out to knock the hell out of them, you are weak-willed and poorly disciplined. Even if 'we' wanted to reach out and knock the hell out of someone, too - we recognize that the choice of behavior always lies with the one acting out that behavior. So there is a different mentality regarding how you speak to someone even if they are being an egotistical prick.

Also, keep in mind that I come from an enforcement perspective. While I was not law enforcement - I worked with many who were. There are things that I don't fully agree with - but I do understand. It is somewhat rare for police to 'engage' someone they do not know or know of. If they stop to chat with a person - there is a file on them, their vehicle, or the symbol they have tattooed on them, somewhere. It may not be in an official document - but there is a sort of 'locker-room knowledge' that ensures other officers know who to look out for on the streets. Most of the time they are stopping someone to put pressure on him/her - it's because he/she has a record, is commonly seen with people who do have records, or has some physical indication of affiliation with a gang or other group.

It's a gray line in law enforcement. An officer is allowed to interact with you.

Without invoking probable cause or some form of charge, however, he can't arrest you.

[video=youtube;6_3dDNPwJTU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_3dDNPwJTU[/video]

Now - this is a case of mutual instigation.

Keep in mind it was politicians who placed these police officers where they are and gave them their mission. They are placed there and given the assignment they are - despite the fact that numerous court rulings have established that citizens are under absolutely no obligation to comply -unless- the officers are willing to invoke probable cause and take the case to court.

Now - doing this type of thing on your average local police officer -might- get you arrested in the long run (since the officer thinks he is right even if the law says he isn't) - but in doing so he does provoke the court system where you would be released and free to file suit against the department for damages including lost work, legal fees, damage to property, etc due to their negligence to ensure competency of their officers.

The biggest thing is: "Am I being detained/arrested?" If you are not - then you are under no obligation to comply with their orders from a legal standpoint. If you are - then they must be able to justify that arrest in court.

Again - this is another bit of a perspective difference.

The way I was raised - being put in handcuffs over a misunderstanding or a minor error is something that can be straightened out and is an inconvenience. It is not necessarily some kind of insult or "disrespect" to my person. Perhaps I was acting stupid, perhaps the officer is mistaken - whatever - it's a day or two of inconvenience that can be taken in stride.

But the perspective is different from those who come from Nations of Men.

They see the world as being varying scales of gang affiliation and authority enforcement. Law enforcement officers, thus, are part of a gang and it is the responsibility of all who are not part of that gang to gang together and protect their territory from this rival gang. That is why they will more willingly choose the option to kill police officers and instigate a conflict that is, from the standpoint of the individual, suicidal. In the grand scheme of things - it is a war of attrition and a war of influence. Every area of the city the police mark as being too dangerous to freely patrol or to take calls of non-life-threatening consequence is a testament to their success at driving out this rival gang.

This is Black Liberation.

It is, in effect, an armed revolution with the intent of usurping local power and bringing it under the authority of warlords.

As I said - Welcome to the Jungle.
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
How do we know what deaths are rooted in racial profiling?

What would 'not disregarding' racial profiling-related deaths look like? Under what set of actions may we properly regard incidents of racial profiling induced fatality?

If those involve prosecution, how does one mount an effective defense against a 'crime' for which there is only circumstantial evidence?

Remember when we had our little discussion about Obama and his alleged intent?

It's all conjecture and wild conspiracy theories that I killed a man rather than fought him to the ground because of a racial difference.

Further - what is the practical likelihood of these policies being equally applied? Do you really think a black police officer shooting a white suspect would be investigated as thoroughly when there is literally zero media coverage of such incidents? Even if racial -prejudice- (not just profiling) was involved, where would the equal protection under the law kick in for whites?
Idk Aim, let's think. Maybe the deaths where the officers throw you in a chokehold for selling cigarettes. You scream you can't breath but they don't care. Your body goes limp, but they don't care. All they care about is getting this man into a jail cell.

Let's try another. Maybe the deaths where the officer loses grip of you and you manage to run. But wait, you're damn near 60 years old and you are running at an astounding 2 mph. The cop thinks to himself, "See now I could chase this man down... I could probably catch hi-... Nah f-ck it I'mma shoot him." Had he shot at him once, I could be like alright well man don't run from the police. Shot at him twice, same thought. Three times, that's a little overboard. Four times, why are you even still shooting? Five times, you realize he's probably already dead right? Six times, what did this man do to you? Seven times, are you still shooting? Eight times, well shit... Don't forget your finishing move. Plant some evidence next to him to justify slaughtering this man.

What's the proof that this is all racially motivated? For example let's look at the findings of the Ferguson DoJ investigation. Blacks in the poorer areas of the town were targeted for petty crimes like J-Walking(We've all done it). The officer would fine them ridiculous amounts of money and the people would be unable to pay. Which sends them to jail with more fines. That cycle would often repeat. Is that not racial profiling?

See, like unlike your argument with Obama being a sleeper cell terrorist who wants to take over the world...
You must be registered for see images


I actually have proof to back my argument up. Not inconclusive evidence that I'm piecing together to make some story.

[video=youtube;27MY9uWKi4o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27MY9uWKi4o[/video]
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Idk Aim, let's think. Maybe the deaths where the officers throw you in a chokehold for selling cigarettes. You scream you can't breath but they don't care. Your body goes limp, but they don't care. All they care about is getting this man into a jail cell.
What about this suggests racial profiling?

Let's try another. Maybe the deaths where the officer loses grip of you and you manage to run. But wait, you're damn near 60 years old and you are running at an astounding 2 mph. The cop thinks to himself, "See now I could chase this man down... I could probably catch hi-... Nah f-ck it I'mma shoot him." Had he shot at him once, I could be like alright well man don't run from the police. Shot at him twice, same thought. Three times, that's a little overboard. Four times, why are you even still shooting? Five times, you realize he's probably already dead right? Six times, what did this man do to you? Seven times, are you still shooting? Eight times, well shit... Don't forget your finishing move. Plant some evidence next to him to justify slaughtering this man.
What evidence suggests race had anything to do with it?

What's the proof that this is all racially motivated? For example let's look at the findings of the Ferguson DoJ investigation. Blacks in the poorer areas of the town were targeted for petty crimes like J-Walking(We've all done it). The officer would fine them ridiculous amounts of money and the people would be unable to pay. Which sends them to jail with more fines. That cycle would often repeat. Is that not racial profiling?
What evidence suggests that is racial profiling?

You have loose conjecture.

The officer issues a citation of law violation. The court establishes the fine. The court imposes the fine when you fail to appear in court.

Even Think Progress has difficulty spinning it:

"Harvey says ArchCity’s clients are often charged with three distinct “poverty crimes,” as they’re sometimes referred to: driving with a suspended license, failure to register a vehicle, and no proof of insurance. Many courts expect fines to be paid in full the night of court, but they do also permit defendants to set up payment plans; others, like Bel-Ridge court, don’t allow them.

If defendants miss court, like Bailey did, a warrant will be issued for their arrest. Defendants arrested for warrants who can’t pay their bonds can spend weeks in jail before they see a judge; no municipalities have court on a daily basis and many meet irregularly. Dellwood court, for example, gathers just once a month.

...

Warrants also impact people’s ability to find housing and employment. Federally funded housing programs require warrants to be cleared, as do many job-training programs, said Val Ferlis, a program director at a shelter for homeless women and families in St. Louis County called Room at the Inn. The St. Louis Housing Authority conducts background checks for applicants, and cites any criminal arrest as grounds for rejection."


As we have seen in your other discussion - this is a FEDERAL REQUIREMENT. Those with a warrant cannot be legally given social security subsidies.

People who do not show up in court have a warrant issued for their arrest. Most of these cases can be dismissed - and usually are. The district loses money when it houses inmates.

Oh... but we have to look there, too:



States and even some federal agencies subsidize inmate sentencing. Much in the same way that schools will falsify attendance in order to secure funding from the federal government - the same can be said of districts that will chase money through incarceration.

When St. Louis is not actually responsible for St. Louis's prison population, financially, then it makes every bit of sense to keep those jails packed and "jobs secure."

This is one of the primary ways in which the government wastes money and we encountered in the military all of the time. If you were allotted 180 man-hours for a given period of time, and you only report that you use 140 - then they will take that 40 man hours out of your work shop and put it somewhere else that claims it needed 210 work hours (which means you lose an available staffing position and it is awarded to those who claim to consume more man-hours).

Man-hour over-reporting was, in a sense, almost a required part of maintaining a staff that could actually perform their function. Honest reporting of man-hours would lead to you being stripped of all of your personnel.

See, like unlike your argument with Obama being a sleeper cell terrorist who wants to take over the world...

I actually have proof to back my argument up. Not inconclusive evidence that I'm piecing together to make some story.
You have shallow evidence for your claims.

There is only one scenario under which Obama's actions make sense.

What you need to understand is that there is little that is racist about police.

The problem is that black culture is inherently antagonistic and self-isolating. In some cases, its idols are essentially advocating for a usurping of law and a destruction of law enforcement.

Doing this while being reliant upon financing from the federal government because of being useless slobs without skills means that blacks are ultimately going to be forever the victim of their own ideology.

Fix your culture and you fix the problem entirely.

Continue down the road you are, and your neck will be beneath my boot in your misguided attempt to rule me.
 
Top