While Nova also was full of words but most of the times he's being direct.
This part of the post clearly pertains to previous events. However, the
red text is written within the present tense. This shows a confluence of tenses, with the sentence referring to the past but also referring to the present for the same event. This is
grammatical flaw #1.
Tbh I think Toujo's presentation here is unlike Nova in the previous game.
Toujo I think is full of words but he hold himself too much, in other words his opinion is less pronounced.
While Nova also was full of words but most of the times he's being direct. The only Problem I have with him that giving me hard time to town lean him is his direct buddying with Naomi.
Line 1 (
Blue) - Refers to Toujo
Line 2 (
Green) - Refers to Toujo.
This it to establish that the focus of this post, is Toujo. It's referring very specifically to Toujo.
Line 3 Pt 1 (
Orange) - This line compares Nova, from a previous game, to Toujo. In other words, Toujo is still the focus of the post, and the clauses are directed towards Toujo. Not to Nova.
Line 3 Pt 2 (
Purple) - This is the line in question. The crucial part of this is the entirety of the line is written within the present tense. There are various words we can pick up on to inform this. These are highlighted in
Yellow and
underlined, see below.
The only Problem I have with him that giving me hard time to town lean him is his direct buddying with Naomi.
Given the overwhelming evidence in favour of this line actually having been written in the present tense, we can conclude that it must pertain to events occuring in the present. However, the Nova thing occurred in the past. In other words, the only way this line can make any grammatical sense as all, is if it in fact refers to Toujo. Given the context of the rest of the post, this means Nova is no longer part of the equation, too. In summary -
the most reasonable conclusion from this is that the buddying of Naomi refers to Toujo.
Because I'm particularly displeased at having my proficiency in the English be insulted by someone who managed to utterly bastardise it in his poor usage, I'm going to point out every last grammatical error within that sentence, given that Ansatsuken later confirmed that the buddying of Naomi did in fact refer to Nova, as per:
It's very clear where I put Naomi with so from where you get that I have you and Naomi buddying? Is this really a comprehension level of top player?
Let's get started shall we? Mistakes are highlighted in
red.
The only Problem I have with him that giving me ^ hard time to town lean him is his direct buddying with Naomi.
Grammatical Flaw #2 - Using a capital letter without it following a full stop, or referring to a name or a place or a thing.
Grammatical Flaw #3 - This word is in the present tense. As it refers to an event that occurred in the past, it shoud be worded within the past tense. In this case, the word "have" should be replaced with "had".
Grammatical Flaw #4 - This word is in the present tense. As it refers to an event that occurred in the past, it shoud be worded within the past tense. In this case, the word "giving" should be replaced with "gave".
Grammatical Flaw #5 - "giving me hard time" or "gave me hard time" does not make sense grammatically. For it to do so, the word "a" needs to be included, so it would read "gave me a hard time".
Grammatical Flaw #6 - This word is in the present tense. As it refers to an event that occurred in the past, it shoud be worded within the past tense. In this case, the word "is" should be replaced with "was".
I am going to give him a pass regarding his use of "town lean".
So there we have in. No fewer than 6 seperate grammatical flaws all within the space of one line. Now I want to be clear. I am not pointing this out to be mean (but I definitely am). Nor am I pointing this out to be spiteful (but I definitely am). I am pointing this out because Ansatsuken has the temerity to insult my understanding of the language when the fault very clearly lies with him. I hope next time he assumes the fault lies with the reader, he actually starts proof reading his posts. At the very least, I hope he has learned his lesson. Never, ever insult my proficiency in my native language again. It is
your fault that you continuously used the wrong tense when writing your post,
not mine. You know what misusing tense results in? Confusion and misunderstandings as to what events it actually pertains to. And with that, my point is made. I now leave you with some highlights from Ansatsuken, in light of how terrible he used the English language within this post.
I think you're coming from English speaking country so if that's true how you read that post wrong?
It's very clear where I put Naomi with
Is this really a comprehension level of top player?
Amazing. Just the complete and utter arrogance and lack of self awareness with some of these people will never, ever fail to astound me. Moving on.
Tbh this is personal opinion. My own opinion on players from an observation. Yes I typed it and shares it with others here. So In this respect, the player that being my talk subject isn't suppose to be the one who addressing/questioning my personal opinion. Its for the other players. They can question my idea behind that comparison, asking to know about the subject inside the opinion. They can agree or disagree with my personal opinion on the subjects.
What actually I would be getting if I responding to my subject? Just like what I'm going to get in return if I'm responding to scum that wants me to elaborate my scum read on them?
So it's non of your business to know with who I'm comparing you.
It's absolutely my business. For one, it involves me, directly. And you should have every interest in me understanding what point you are making, and why, as without it I cannot possibly make any sort of defence or counter-argument. Not to mention, the idea that you can just merge two seperate players from two seperate games to form a read on one of them is inccredibly poorly-conceived. Then again, on the basis of this post, and your reaction to your grammatically-atrocious post not being immediately understood, it being poorly-conceived isn't terribly surprising. Or surprising at all, actually.
